Corresponding Province - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: corresponding province Page 1 of about 308 results (0.021 seconds)Province of West Bengal Vs. Surja Kanta Jana
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1954Cal544,58CWN424
As has been pointed out already, not only did the Province raise objections about the maintainability of the suit, but also
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. the Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1977SC879; (1977)1SCC643; [1977]1SCR1002; [1977]39STC340(SC)
on' 'Statute Law', 6th Edn. p.386).25. Although, there is no corresponding provision in our General Clauses Acts, yet, it shows that of this Act to have taken place in the Central Provinces and Berar.8. Section 2 of the Amending Act of 1949
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of Bombay Vs. Kusaldas S. Advani and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1950SC222; (1951)53BOMLR1; (1950)IIMLJ703(SC); [1950]1SCR621
Governor.' 126. The Governor is thus the executive head of Province and all executive acts are done in his name. This
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of West Bengal Vs. Midnapore Zemindary Co. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1950Cal159,54CWN677
be deemed to have been made on behalf of the Province of East Bengal instead of the Province of Bengal and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Province of Bombay Vs. Western India Automobile Association
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1949Bom141; (1949)51BOMLR58
prepared to recognise the Union or to carry on any correspondence with it. On December 30, 1946, the President of the reinstatement. I would therefore allow the appeal preferred by the Province of Bombay, set aside the order of the trial Judge,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Province of Madras, Represented by the District Collector Vs. Bodd ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1941Mad913; (1941)2MLJ607
is ultra vires to this extent, and there is a corresponding defect in the rules framed under the Act, which means regards goods centrally excisable, taxes on their sale within the Province for purposes of consumption, when such taxes are in no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of West Bengal and anr. Vs. Bholanath Sen and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1950Cal174,54CWN322
G.N. Das, J.1. This is an appeal by the Province of Bengal against an order dated 23rd September 1946, passed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Province of Bombay Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1954Bom1; (1953)55BOMLR670; ILR1953Bom1081
parties-- the Municipality of Ahmedabad and the Government of the Province of Bombay --in relation to each other as far as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of Bombay Vs. Madhukar Ganpat Nerlekar
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1952Bom37; (1951)53BOMLR754; ILR1952Bom269
58 (f) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act or the corresponding provisions contained in the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1902, the bear his own costs and also the costs of the Province of Bombay. As far as the suit costs are concerned,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of Bengal Vs. Midnapore Zamindari Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1945Cal341
Act, and there were no provisions in the old Act corresponding to those which are to be found now in Sections B.K. Mukherjea, J.1. This appeal is on behalf of the Province of Bengal and is directed against a decree of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>