Correcting - Judgment Search Results

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

..... disease unhygienic living conditions low caste and consequential isolation and in accordance with correct principle i e with reference to the continuing ill effects of historical discrimination ..... economic level shall be denied reservation amongst the aforementioned backward classes of citizens correctly identified to be qualified for reservation preference may be legitimately extended to the .....

Mrs. Sarojini Ramaswami Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC2219; JT1992(5)SC1; 1992(2)SCALE257; (1992)4SCC506; [1992]Supp1SCR108

..... and intention to exclude determination by a judicial process of the correctness of the allegations of misbehaviour or incapacity on a more ..... committed by the committee and at the threshold they be corrected and the judicial review after removal is not efficacious the ..... of the remedy after removal does not preclude the court to correct illegalities or errors at the earliest 138 though the contentions .....

Wright Vs. West

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in detail the question whether a satisfactory conclusion was one that the habeas court considered correct as opposed to merely reasonable because we concluded that the constitutional claims advanced in ..... habeas statute itself a state court determination of a purely factual question must be presumed correct and can be overcome only by convincing evidence unless one of eight statutorily enumerated .....

Hotel Balaji and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Oth ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC1048; JT1992(6)SC182; 1993(37)KarLJ204; 1992(2)SCALE924; 1993Supp(4)SCC536; [1992]Supp2SCR182; [1993]88STC98(SC)

..... depots of his agents outside the state therefore the ratio of goodyear keeping aside its correctness for the time being has absolutely no application the haryana and bombay provisions considered in ..... we are inclined to agree with the learned counsel his submission appears to represent the correct principle in matters where the legislative competence of a legislature to enact a particular provision .....

Jugal Kishore Prabhatilal Sharma and Others Vs. Vijayendra Prabhatilal ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC864; 1993(1)ARBLR488(SC); 1992(2)SCALE893; (1993)1SCC114; [1992]Supp2SCR118

..... details and examine whether the opponents objections in various items thereof and their genuineness or correctness should have been accepted or not the principal contention of the objectors in regard to ..... this exhibit was relied upon in the special leave petition itself constitutes an admission as to the correctness of and the applicants acquiescence in the figures contained therein 6 we are unable .....

Laxama Reddy and ors. Vs. the State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1992(2)ALT169

..... view of section 38 e of the telangana tenancy act are accidental mistakes which require correction having heard the said matter the primary tribunal dismissed the said application as per ..... act empowers the revenue divisional officer the district collector tribunal and the appellate tribunal to correct any clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments or errors arising therein from any accidental .....

Keeney Vs. Tamayo-reyes

Court: US Supreme Court

..... finding that respondent was properly served by his trial interpreter and that the interpreter correctly fully and accurately translated the communications between respondent and his attorney app 51 the ..... that state courts committed constitutional error advances comity by allowing a coordinate jurisdiction to correct its own errors in the first instance it reduces the inevitable friction that results .....

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operative Housing Society Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(2)BomCR329

..... from the decisions of the apex court many of these sentences do not represent the correct legal position next an attempt is made to restrict the admissibility to subsequent interpreting ..... 1962 it certainly does not constitute an admission of ratanchand that plaintiff s interpretation was correct what it records is ratanchand s disagreeing with plaintiff s interpretation and his commitment to .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... when those decisions have generated uncertainty and failed to provide clear guidance because correction through legis 951 lative action is practically impossible internal quotation marks omitted ..... brandeis j dissenting erroneous decisions in such constitutional cases are uniquely durable because correction through legislative action save for 955 constitutional amendment is impossible it is therefore .....

FranklIn Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the president s intervention deprives the secretary s action of finality the possibility of correction would mean at most that appellees challenge was not ripe until the secretary s eventual ..... longer obtained the refusal to reconsider would be quite capricious the district court was certainly correct in concluding that i nertia cannot supply the necessary rationality for the secretary s decision .....