Corps - Judgment Search Results

Celotex Corp. Vs. Edwards

Court: US Supreme Court

..... entered a judgment in favor of respondents and against petitioner celotex corp to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal petitioner posted a ..... the supersedeas bonds including northbrook see second amended complaint in celotex corp v allstate ins co adversary no 92 584 bkrtcy ct ..... of debtor s reorganization plan cf macarthur co v johns manville corp 837 f 2d 89 93 ca2 noting that a bankruptcy .....

Fulton Corp. Vs. Faulkner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... holding that the taxable percentage deduction violated the commerce clause fulton corp v justus 110 n c app 493 430 s e 2d ..... appealed to the supreme court of north carolina which reversed fulton corp v justus 338 n c 472 450 s e 2d ..... impermissibly discriminatory tax retains flexibility in responding to this determination mckesson corp v division of alcoholic beverages and tobacco fla dept of business .....

Freightliner Corp. Vs. Myrick

Court: US Supreme Court

..... federal law and granted summary judgment for petitioner freightliner myrick v fruehauf corp 795 f supp 1139 nd ga 1992 following the opinion in ..... the eleventh circuit consolidated the cases and reversed myrick v freuhauf corp 13 f 3d 1516 1994 it held that under its previous ..... of congressional intent with respect to state authority malone v white motor corp 435 u s at 505 there is no need to infer .....

Curtiss-wright Corp. Vs. Schoonejongen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circuit no 93 1935 argued january 17 1995 decided march 6 1995 petitioner curtiss wright corp amended its employee benefit plan to provide that the postretirement health care coverage it had ..... schoonejongen 514 u s 73 1995 october term 1994 syllabus curtiss wright corp v schoonejongen et al certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third .....

J.K. Corp. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1995(II)OLR187

or otherwise to any private person or to any authority corporation agency or any other organisation not owned managed or controlled

Sailesh Kumar Singh Vs. Indian Petrochemicals Corp. Limited

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1995(2)WLN103

95 a legal notice was issued to the indian petrochemicals corporation limited the petitioner was allowed to appear in the test

Fedders Lloyd Corp. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Customs and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995(59)LC203(Delhi)

reproduced as follows in the circumstances m s fedders lloyd corpn ltd new delhi shri b r punj managing director of

Minor Prahlad Ugardas Patel Oral Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1995)53TTJ(Ahd.)115

as corpus capital fund and such chance of getting the corpus after the period of 19 years is also subject to

Anam Premkumar Reddy and ors. Vs. India Fruits Ltd. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(3)ALT170; [1996]85CompCas625(AP)

as beneficial owner until the time for distribution of the corpus arrives in any event section 155 provides only for rectification

Rabinder Nath Kataiya and anr. Vs. Haryana State Through Collector

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1996)112PLR648

v k jhanji j 1 this shall dispose of regular first appeals nos 939 652 678 680 to 683 1002...