Court : Delhi
..... the public domain for the rest of us: the relatively short life of patents; the longer, but finite, life of copyrights; copyright s idea expression dichotomy; the fair use doctrine; the prohibition on copyrighting television broadcasts and musical compositions; federal preemption of overbroad state intellectual property laws; the nominative use doctrine in trademark law; the ..... including the imparting of instructions to pupils 69. this provision has been retained in the statute book. this was suggested by the committee, constituted in 1957, under the chairmanship of justice n. rajagopala ayyangar to take a fresh look at patent law to suggest the best way to best sub-serve the ..... the purview of the enactment. [emphasis supplied].12. furthermore, the nature of section 107a of the act as a proviso/exception can be seen from its placement in the statute by the legislature. it finds mention in chapter xviii which is titled "suits fao (os) (comm) 169/2017 page 10 of 90 concerning infringement .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has ample powers to mould the relief to ensure that the plaintiffs rights are adequately protected.30. the indian copyright act, 1957 ( the copyright act ) confers a bundle of exclusive rights on the owner of a work and provides for remedies in case the copyright is infringed. the relevant portion of cs (comm) 724/2017 & ors. page 57 of 99 statement ..... is pertinent to mention that this court has delegated its power to the learned joint registrar for passing such orders under section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966 read with chapter ii, rule 3(61) read with rule 6 of the delhi high court (original side) rules 2018. the said provisions are reproduced hereinbelow:-" 3. ..... side) rules, 2018 reproduced hereinbelow:-" 5. appeal against the registrar s orders.- any persons aggrieved by any order made by the registrar, under rule 3 of this chapter, may, within fifteen days of such order, appeal against the same to the judge in chambers. the appeal shall be in the form of a petition bearing court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... prudent to refer to section 62 of the copyright act, 1957: 62. jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this chapter (1) every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this act shall be instituted in the district court having ..... persons, any of them actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain. 11. the scope and ambit of section 62 of the copyright act, 1957 has been laid down by the hon ble supreme court in exphar sa v. eupharma laboratories ltd., (2004) 3 scc688 (para13) it prescribes an additional ground ..... above, there can no doubt that an agreement conferring exclusive jurisdiction will not be in violation of section 28 of the indian contract act, 1872 or section 62 of the copyright act, 1957. the only condition that is to be seen is whether such an agreement is clear and unambiguous and the intention of the parties .....
Tag this Judgment!