Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Court: kolkata Page 13 of about 124 results (1.164 seconds)

Jun 22 2012 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... or precarious interest, such as that of a mortgagee or lessee.489. property includes not only real and personal property but also incorporeal rights such as patents, copyrights, leases, chooses in action and every other thing or exchangeable value which a person may have. in other words, the meaning of property would connotes everything ..... sutlej jagirs were liable to be resumed under the provisions of the punjab resumption of jagirs act, 1957. the validity of this act was challenged on, inter alia, the ground that the state legislature was not competent to enact the act. the supreme court framed the issue as to whether there was any requisition by section 2 ..... not illusory. thereby they are not void. we further hold that after the constitution forty-fourth amendment act has come into force, the right to property in articles 19(1)(f) and 31 had its obliteration from chapter iii, fundamental rights. its abridgement and curtailment does not retrieve its lost position, nor gets restituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2012 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... or precarious interest, such as that of a mortgagee or lessee. property includes not only real and personal property but also incorporeal rights such as patents, copyrights, leases, chooses in action and every other thing or exchangeable value which a person may have. in other words, the meaning of property would connotes everything ..... sutlej jagirs were liable to be resumed under the provisions of the punjab resumption of jagirs act, 1957. the validity of this act was challenged on, inter alia, the ground that the state legislature was not competent to enact the act. the supreme court framed the issue as to whether there was any requisition by section 2 ..... not illusory. thereby they are not void. we further hold that after the constitution forty-fourth amendment act has come into force, the right to property in articles 19(1)(f) and 31 had its obliteration from chapter iii, fundamental rights. its abridgement and curtailment does not retrieve its lost position, nor gets restituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2016 (HC)

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Sushil Kumar Sitaldas Dhirani

Court : Kolkata

..... 2). person includes the registered proprietor and the registered user. section 62 of the copyright act: 62. (1) (2) jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this chapter.--every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this ..... act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. for the purpose of ..... company nor its branch office were at delhi and merely that the reseller sells its product neither fulfils the criterion enshrined under section 62 of the copyright act nor satisfies the conditions of section 20 of the code of civil procedure. the provision of section 20 of the code of civil procedure was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2017 (HC)

Saregama India Limited Vs. Whackedout Media Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Court : Kolkata

..... approach, kolkata 700 072 within the aforesaid jurisdiction and is thus entitled to file the instant suit in this hon ble court under section 62 of the copyright act, 1957. . mr. ratnanko banerjee, learned senior counsel along with mr. subhasis sengupta, advocate on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the law laid ..... of business is at dumdum. a subordinate office cannot be considered as a place of business within the meaning of carrying section 62(2) of the copyright act, 1957. on business under the learned senior counsel taking inspiration from some of the observations made by the hon ble division bench of delhi high court in ..... such place. section 62(2) of the copyright act 62. under this jurisdiction chapter.- of (1) court over matters every suit or arising other civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this act shall be instituted in the district court having .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //