Court : US Supreme Court
..... laws of taxation, for the regulation of foreign, federal, and indian commerce, and so for the abolition of the slave trade, for the protection of copyrights and inventions, for the establishment of postal communication and courts of justice, and for the punishment of crimes are as operative there as within the states. ..... and enjoyment, or the perfect right of acquisition and enjoyment, of an entire equality of privileges, civil and political. thus vattel, in the preliminary chapter to his treatise on the law of nations, says: "nations or states are bodies politic, societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting ..... in the mississippi territory, were adopted. a territorial government was organized between the chattahoochee and mississippi rivers. this was within the limits of georgia. these acts dismembered georgia. they established a separate government upon her soil, while they rather derisively professed "that the establishment of that government shall in no respects .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... we are an independent and democratic country today." w. rutledge, a declaration of legal faith 25-27 (1947) page 433 u. s. 666 only by ignoring this chapter in our history could we invoke principles of federalism to defeat enforcement of the "magna carta of free enterprise" [ footnote 2/39 ] enacted pursuant to congress' plenary ..... of the antitrust laws is therefore applicable to this species of violation, as well as to other kinds of violations. since 16 of the clayton act is an act of congress which expressly authorizes an injunction against a state court proceeding which violates the antitrust laws, the plain language of the anti-injunction statute excepts ..... providing for injunctions against violation of any right secured by the copyright laws); 26 u.s.c. 9011(b) (presidential election campaign fund act); 29 u.s.c. 412 (labor-management reporting and disclosure act); 42 u.s.c. 2000e-5 (title vii (equal employment opportunities) of the civil rights act of 1964); 42 u.s.c. 6305, 6395(e .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... districts, numbered one (1) through eight (8), each district coextensive with the county, with one (1) representative to be elected from each district. [acts 1901, ch. 122, 6; shan., 126a1; code 1932, 144; acts 1957, ch. 220, 1; 1959, ch. 213, 1.]" "3-106. joint representatives. -- the following counties jointly, shall elect one representative, as follows ..... said counties by virtue of sections 2-1201 et seq. of tennessee code annotated, and section 2-301 et seq. of tennessee code annotated, and chapter 164 of the acts of 1949, inter alia." the question whether the named defendants are sufficient parties remains open for consideration on remand. [ footnote 26 ] smiley v. ..... election commissioners for all the counties of the state of tennessee, the organization and supervision of the biennial elections as provided by the statutes of tennessee, chapter 9 of title 2 of the tennessee code annotated, sections 2-901, et seq. " "that this action is brought against the aforenamed defendants in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... , so as to limit such recovery to "exceptional cases." 66 stat. 813. [ footnote 17 ] see, e.g., clayton act, 4, 38 stat. 731, 15 u.s.c. 15; communications act of 1934, 206, 48 stat. 1072, 47 u.s.c. 206; copyright act, 17 u.s.c. 116; fair labor standards act, 16(b), 52 stat. 1069, 29 u.s.c. 216(b); interstate commerce ..... .1941). [ footnote 5 ] e.g., youthform co. v. r. h. macy & co., 153 f.supp. 87 (d.c.n.d. ga.1957); williamson-dickie mfg. co. v. davis mfg. co., 149 f.supp. 852 (d.c.e.d.pa.1957); francis h. leggett & co. v. premier packing co., 140 f.supp. 328 (d.c. mass.1956); singer mfg. co. v. singer upholstering ..... is inappropriate in this context. affirmed. [ footnote 1 ] section 35 of the lanham act, 15 u.s.c. 1117: "when a violation of any right of the registrant of a mark registered in the patent office shall have been established in any civil action arising under this chapter, the plaintiff shall be entitled, subject to the provisions of sections 1111 and 1114 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... abolished all monopolies except grants for a term of years to the inventors of new manufactures. this exception is the groundwork of patents for new inventions and copyrights of books. these have always been sustained as beneficial to the state. but all other monopolies were abolished as tending to the impoverishment of the people ..... this liberty is assumed to be the natural right of every englishman. the struggle of the english people against monopolies forms one of the most interesting and instructive chapters in their history. it finally ended in the passage of the statute of 21st james i, by which it was declared "that all monopolies and all ..... new orleans, at the same time authorizing the company to erect other landing-places and other slaughterhouses at any points consistent with the provisions of the act. the act then provides that, when the slaughterhouses and accessory buildings have been completed and thrown open for use, public notice thereof shall be given for thirty days .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... his views in doucette v. vincent, 194 f.2d 834. [ footnote 2/17 ] the seventh 5-year index-digest of american maritime cases, 1953-1957 (1957), xliii-xlviii. this source reports all state court decisions, including those not published otherwise. [ footnote 2/18 ] the court later, however, recognizes that ..... new york corporations, and international terminal operating company, a delaware corporation, are of diverse citizenship from the petitioner, a spanish subject. since the jones act provides an independent basis of federal jurisdiction over the non-diverse respondent, compania trasatlantica, the rule of strawbridge v. curtiss, 3 cranch 267, does ..... of jurisdiction have been carefully wrought to correspond to the realities of power and interest and national policy. to give a novel sweep to the act would disrupt traditional maritime policies, and quite gratuitously disturb a complementary, historic interacting federal-state relationship. an infusion of general maritime jurisdiction into the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... f.supp. 466, 472, n. 2. the latest amendments prior to the bringing of suit in the gallagher case were in 1957. mass.acts 1957, cc. 300, 356, 16, 17, 18. by mass.acts 1960, c. 812, 3, the provisions of chapter 136, massachusetts' general sunday regulations, were made applicable to all or part of certain legal holidays, e.g., january first, ..... to 534a, seven times in 1959. maryland laws 1959, cc. 232, 236, 248, 503, 510, 715, 811. [ footnote 2/80 ] e.g., n.d.laws 1959, c. 131; tenn. acts 1957, c. 219. [ footnote 2/81 ] e.g., fla.laws 1959, c. 59-295; me.laws 1959, c. 302; okla.laws 1959, p. 210. [ footnote 2/82 ] maine, minnesota, ..... challenged in the mcgowan case, appellants' claims under the due process and equal protection clauses show themselves clearly untenable. counsel contend that the sunday sales prohibition, md.code ann., 1957, art. 27, 521, is rendered arbitrary by its exception of retail sales of tobacco items and soft drinks, page 366 u. s. 536 ice and ice cream, confectionery .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... 38 ] to decide if debts [ footnote 39 ] or penalties [ footnote 40 ] are due the united states, and to determine the liability of the united states for patent or copyright infringement [ footnote 41 ] and for other specially designated torts. [ footnote 42 ] in addition, it has been given jurisdiction to review, on issues of law including the existence of substantial ..... however, been specified for reduction by congress; the action of the judges was understandable, coming, as it did, after bakelite had been decided, and, under 109 of the act, 47 stat. 403, the treasury was authorized to accept reductions in payment voluntarily tendered by judges whose salary was constitutionally exempt from diminution. [ footnote 30 ] 36 stat. 106 ..... the practice of masters in chancery. for the judicial quality of the proceedings, see the revised rules of the court of claims effective december 2, 1957, 140 ct.cl. ii, 28 u.s.c. app., p. 5237 as amended, id. (supp. iii), p. 863. [ footnote 37 ] in 1950, tucker .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... 547 (1987) ("there is no evidence that the federal government coerced 411 or encouraged the usoc in the exercise of its right [to deny use of its copyright]"). these cases differ markedly from the "interdependence" or "joint participation" analysis of burton and stand for the principle that, unless the government affirmatively influenced or coerced ..... vis-avis regulatory commissioners seems to us of minor consequence for present purposes-especially since, by the very terms of the chartering act, congress's "right to repeal, alter, or amend this chapter at any time is expressly reserved." 45 u. s. c. 541. respondent appeals to statements this court made in a ..... of louisiana operate segregated trains through a state-owned amtrak. in pennsylvania v. board of directors of city trusts of philadelphia, 353 u. s. 230 (1957) (per curiam), we held that girard college, which had been built and maintained pursuant to a privately erected trust, was nevertheless a governmental actor for constitutional .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... attributed to america s beef producers sm. other promotional materials in the record, however, bear other attributions (such as a notice identifying the beef board as the copyright holder, or the apparently untrademarked phrase funded by america s veal producers through the beef checkoff ). app. 52. footnote 11 america s beef producers might be ..... of dietary health information, id ., at i, does not encourage the consumption of beef (as the beef ads do) is clear from the fact that a different chapter, which discusses fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fat-free dairy products, is entitled food groups to encourage. id ., at 23. footnote 8 notably, the court nowhere ..... generic advertising at issue is the government s own speech and therefore is exempt from first amendment scrutiny. i a the beef promotion and research act of 1985 (beef act or act), 99 stat. 1597, announces a federal policy of promoting the marketing and consumption of beef and beef products, using funds raised by an assessment .....
Tag this Judgment!