Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 36 of about 428 results (0.198 seconds)

Omprakash Verma and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... bound by the determination of surplus land by the competent authority on the basis of their own declaration and the various orders passed under the ulc act. they cannot be permitted to re-open the chapter after about 25 years.42) mr. chowdhary, learned senior counsel contended that when a doubt arises about what the court intended then the same must ..... :"9. the meaning of the word `vesting' has been considered by this court time and again. in the fruit & vegetable merchants union v. the delhi improvement trust, air 1957 sc 344, this court held that the meaning of word `vesting' varies as per the context of the statute in which the property vests. while considering the case under sections ..... , the owner sought restoration of the order of the district judge which had been set aside by the high court on the interpretation of the provisions of the ulc act. the act came into force in the state of uttar pradesh on 17-2-1976. at that time, there was no master plan for the area of aligarh. the master .....

Siddamurthy Jayarami Reddy (D) by Lrs. Vs. Godi Jaya Rami Reddy and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .24. since the subject will is not covered by any of the clauses of section 57, part vi of the 1925 act is not applicable thereto. section 141 which falls in chapter xiii of part vi of the 1925 act that provides - if a legacy is bequeathed to a person who is named an executor of the will, he shall not ..... ".28. the testator gave two very particular directions in the will that until lakshumamma attained the age of majority and attained power to manage properties; (one) rami reddy shall act as an executor till then and (two) the executor shall look after the female members in the family, namely, his wife subbamma, widowed daughter-in-law, daughter pitchamma, ..... v. kali prasanna bhattacharyya and others [a.i.r. 1956 tripura 18]; p. lakshmi reddy v. l. lakshmi reddy [(1957) scr 195]; al. pr. ranganathan chettiar and another v. al. pr. al. periakaruppan chettiar and others [a.i.r. 1957 s.c. 815];darshan singh and others v. gujjar singh (dead) by lrs. and others [(2002) 2 scc 62];govindammal .....

Bhoop Singh Vs. Ram Singh Major and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC196; II(1996)BC365(SC); JT1995(6)SC534; (1996)1MLJ38(SC); (1996)112PLR559; 1995(5)SCALE228; (1995)5SCC709; [1995]Supp3SCR466

..... therein. in case where no such interest is created the document will be valid, despite it being non-registered and will not be hit by section 17 of the act.15. in ratan lal sharma v. purshottam harit : [1974]3scr109 , this court held that the award had expressly made an exclusive allotment of partnership assets, including ..... every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be, created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded. sub-section (2) of section 17 of the act engrafts exceptions to the instruments covered only by clauses 7(b) and (c) of sub-section (1). we are concerned with clause (vi) of sub-section (2). clause ..... held that the compromise decree in an earlier suit being relatable to immovable property which was subject matter of the suit, section 17(2)(vi) of the registration act did exempt the decree from registration. it was, therefore, held that the compromise decree in question was not required to be registered for conferring title in respect .....

Treogi Nath Vs. the Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC205; (1968)ILLJ1SC; [1968]1SCR97

..... money due from the employer - (1) where any money is due to a workman from an employer under a settlement or an award or under the provisions of chapter va, the workman may, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, make an application to the appropriate government for the recovery of the money due to him, ..... by the appellants in their applications related to one of those enumerated in the second schedule, that would be immaterial, because, under s. 7(1) of the act, a labour court is constituted for the purpose of adjudication of industrial disputes relating to those matter, and it cannot possibly be contended that these disputes raised by individual ..... in fact, this court, in the central bank of india ltd. v. p. s. rajagopalan etc., : (1963)iillj89sc clearly held that proceedings under s. 33c of the act are in the nature of execution proceeding and are not meant to include in them proceedings for adjudication of industrial disputes which can only be competently decided by a labour .....

Gujarat Electricity Board, thermal Power Station, Ukai Vs. Hind Mazdoo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1893; [1995(71)FLR102]; (1995)2GLR1550; JT1995(4)SC264; 1995LabIC2207; (1995)IILLJ790SC; 1995(3)SCALE498; (1995)5SCC27; [1995]Supp1SCR173; (1996)1UPLBEC359

..... principal employer is permitted to recover the amount so paid, from the contractor. sections 22 to 27 of chapter vi prescribe penalties for contravention of the provisions of the act. section 29 of chapter vii requires every principal employer and every contractor to maintain such registers and records giving such particulars of contract labour ..... direct labour was employed by the company in some of the major ghats, but in the smaller ghats the old contract labour continued. on 29th april, 1957, a conciliation meeting was held to consider the demand made by the sibsagar transhipment labour union for direct employment of workmen at three minor ghats. no decision ..... the petition by contending that if the petitioners had any genuine grievance, they could avail themselves of the rights secured to them under the act, minimum wages act, equal remuneration act, etc. for seeking appropriate relief. it was further contended on behalf of the company that certain jobs though required to be done within .....

State of Assam Vs. the Amalgamated Tea Estates Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC2072; (1970)3SCC819

..... naharkatia town committee insofar as it related to the area of the naharkatia tea estate. the state of assam has appealed to this court with special leave.4. chapter xii of the assam municipal act, 1956, deals with 'small towns'. section 334 deals with constitution of notified area, which insofar as it is relevant provides:(1) the state government may, ..... court against the judgment of the high court, of assam 'declaring ultra-virus' a notification dated december 4, 1959 issued under section 334(4) of the assam municipal act, 1956 (no. 15 of 1957).2. by notification dated may 22,1958 issued in exercise of the powers conferred by section 334(1) of the assam municipal ..... act, 1956, the government of assam signified its intention to declare that with respect to a specified area (including a part of the naharkatia tea estate) 'improved arrangements' were .....

M/S. Afcons InfrA. Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S Cherian Varkey Constn ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... provisions.13.1) maxwell on interpretation of statutes (12th edn., page 228), under the caption `modification of the language to meet the intention' in the chapter dealing with `exceptional construction' states the position succinctly: "where the language of a statute, in its ordinary meaning and grammatical construction, leads to a ..... require the consent of parties. arbitration23. arbitration is an adjudicatory dispute resolution process by a private forum, governed by the provisions of the ac act. the said act makes it clear that there can be reference to arbitration only if there is an `arbitration agreement' between the parties. if there was ..... the high court also held that the concept of pre existing arbitration agreement which was necessary for reference to arbitration under the provisions of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 (`ac act' for short) was inapplicable to references under section 89 of the code, having regard to the decision in sukanya holdings (p) ltd. v. jayesh .....

O.P. Sharma and ors. Vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and associates with legal service activities. most importantly, he should faithfully abide by the standards of professional conduct and etiquette prescribed by the bar council of india in chapter ii, part vi of the bar council of india rules.32) as a rule, an advocate being a member of the legal profession has a social duty to ..... will only result in the ultimate destruction of a system without which no democracy can survive.25) in lalit mohan das vs. advocate general, orissa & another, air 1957 sc 250, this court observed as under: "a member of the bar undoubtedly owes a duty to his client and must place before the court all that can fairly ..... and chamber by police officials for not passing an order they sought. this court held that, "the courts cannot be compelled to give "command orders". the act committed amounts to deliberate interference with the discharge of duty of a judicial officer by intimidation apart from scandalizing and lowering the dignity of the court and interference with .....

Jose Da Costa and anr. Vs. Bascora Sadasiva Sinai Narcornim and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC1843; (1976)2SCC917

..... retrospective effect and (2) when the court to which appeal lay at the commencement of the suit stands abolished (see garikapatti veeraya v. n. subbiah choudhry : [1957]1scr488 and colonial sugar refining co. ltd. v. irving, 1905 ac 369. 29. in the light of the above principles, these points arise for consideration: are ..... by the authority empowered thereby in such behalf.(2) in every law or notification passed or issued before the commencement of this act in which reference is made to or to any chapter or section or provision of any law hereby repealed, such reference shall, so far as may be practicable, be taken to be made ..... of any such right, privilege, obligation or liability as aforesaid. and any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced as if this act had not been passed:provided further that, subject to the preceding proviso notifications published, declarations and rules made, places appointed, agreements filed, awards made or filed, .....

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Ajay Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : II(2010)BC173,[2010]155CompCas1(SC),[2010]98SCL424(SC),2010(3)LC1300(SC)

..... for the purpose of recovery of tax assessed on the hindu undivided family for assessment in respect of the years 1950-1951 and 1956-1957 since the relevant provisions of 1961 act were not given any retrospective operation. it is not in dispute that the assessment of tax in respect of the assessment year for the hindu undivided family was ..... after an adjudicatory proceeding, persons on whom such penalty is imposed cannot be called an accused. it has been held that proceedings under section 23(1a) of foreign exchange regulation act, 1947 are adjudicatory in character and not criminal proceedings see director of enforcement v. m.c.t.m. corporation pvt. ltd. and ors. : (1996) 2 scc 471. ..... 3 as a body corporate and the powers and functions of the board have been clearly stated in chapter iv and under section 11 of the said act.43. a perusal of section 11, sub-section 2(a) of the said act makes it clear that the primary function of the board is to regulate the business in stock exchanges .....