Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-17-1970
Reported in : AIR1971Bom124; (1971)73BOMLR260; [1971(22)FLR268]; ILR1971Bom910; 1971LabIC429; 1971MhLJ69
..... would here emphasize. at the time when that decision was given the definition of 'wages' was different. prior to the amendment of the definition introduced by act 68 of 1957 the definition was 'wages' means all remuneration, capable of being expressed in terms of money, which would, if the terms of the contract of employment, express ..... it is clear that the very fundamental principle involved in the constitution and functioning of companies has been given a go-by by the provisions contained in chapter iii-a of direct management and control of industrial undertakings by the central government. it can hardly therefore be said that the company qua company continues to ..... powers are powers of supervision and are in no way comparable to the powers of control and management given to the central government under chapter iii-a of the industries (development and regulation) act. we are unable to accept this contention. 52. in the result, we hold that the payment of wages authority had no jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-17-1970
Reported in : (1972)ILLJ130Bom
..... grievance is being made before us so far as these provisions are concerned. the provisions of s. 17 which are again very similar to the provisions of the factories act contained in chapter vi thereof relate to the working hours of industrial premises. here again no particular complaint is made; but reference to the working hours will be made when the questions ..... owner and occupier of a beedi factory where one pandurang londhe was working as a workman and employee. he worked for a certain number of days in 1957 and ceased to work from august, 1957. it was alleged by the prosecution that pandurang's services were terminated by a notice. it was admitted that a notice to that effect was put up .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-03-1970
Reported in : AIR1971Bom16; (1970)72BOMLR741; ILR1971Bom1556; 1971MhLJ87
..... by the plaintiff in the subsequent suit could not have been got in the execution proceedings. the fact that the plaintiff did not pursue the remedies given under the execution chapter would not bar the subsequent suit.9. in the case of ambika charan bhakta v. ram prosad chatterjee : air1926cal377 , a division bench of the calcutta high court ..... municipal no. 401 at mangalwedha and for possession. as we will show by reference to the plaint itself, the plaintiff did not contest the order dated 4th april 1957 made in execution proceedings against his predecessor-in-title, watave. the defendant no. 1 filed his written statement in the said suit in which he contended that he ..... , void. he also contended that the plaintiff's suit, not having been filed within a period of one year from 4th april 1957, was barred by law of limitation under article 11-a of the indian limitation act, 1908. the defendant no. 3 in her written statement supported the case of the defendant no. 2.2b. the trial court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-16-1970
Reported in : 1971CriLJ1322; 1971MhLJ172
..... cases arising in any such district shall be heard at bombay. this court has also made rules under article 227 of the constitution and rule 1 in chapter xxxi provides that all appeals, applications, references and petitions including petitions for exercise of powers under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution arising in the judicial ..... a court at bombay. the opponents rely upon certain decisions for this proposition. in north bengal das brothers zemindary co. ltd. v. surendra nath das ilr (1957) cal 6, a question was raised about the jurisdiction of the court to entertain a suit. in that case, the cause of action was based on the ..... state insurance corporation v. m. haji mohomed ismail sahib, : air1960mad64 was also relied upon. that was a case of payment of contribution under the employees' state insurance act, 1948. the office of the -employees' state insurance corporation was at madras. the factories were outride madras. there were defaults in making contributions. no place for payment .....
Tag this Judgment!