Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Court: mumbai Page 22 of about 288 results (0.096 seconds)

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

..... holds substantial immovable property in the country. this is an area of legislative intervention. in india, parliament has amended the law by incorporating a full chapter on transfer pricing to deal with cross-border transactions. however, section 9 has not been amended. a look-through provision cannot be introduced by judicial interpretation ..... interest could not by itself be acquired or transferred but was an incident which arose out of the holding of a particular number of shares. 16 (1957) 31 itr 64371. in commissioner of wealth tax vs. mahadeo jalan,17 the supreme court recognised the same legal position in indian law, holding that ..... to manifest its absurdity. presence, not residence, is the test".(emphasis supplied).117. the law lord observed that the same time, the income- tax acts impose their own territorial limits, since parliament recognizes the almost universally accepted principle that fiscal legislation is not enforceable outside the limits of the territorial sovereignty of .....

Pramod M. Jhaveri and anr. Vs. Sukhdeo Ramratan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom42; 1978MhLJ300

..... section (2) of section 11, further provides that 'no order of the state government or of any officer or authority made under this chapter shall be questioned in any court'. the said chapter is chapter iii which provides for 'liquidation of certain debts'. section 12 provides for reference. it ordains in subsection (1) thereof, 'if a ..... revived debts, as if those provisions were always amended and in operation on the appointed day.' the act comprises of six chapters and 23 sections. the act makes several departures from the provisions of the ordinance. 12. section 2 (e) of the act defines debt. it provides; ' 'debt' means any liability, in cash or kind, outstanding on ..... said dicta received imprimatur of the privy council in attorney-general of the commonwealth of australia v. raginam and the boiler-makers' society of australia reported in (1957) 2 all er 45. in regi-nam's case (supra) the privy council was concerned with the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the constitution of .....

ishwarlal Hiralal Gunderia Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR232; 1990CriLJ615; 1989MhLJ791

..... which it is held that cause of action does not attract jurisdiction under article 226 and that section 41 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 (under which nagpur bench is constituted) and chapter xxxi of the bombay high court. appellate side rules, 1960 (which deal with territorial jurisdiction of nagpur bench over matters arising in ..... on the presence of the person or authority within the territories in relation to which the high court exercises jurisdiction.'in in re the kerala education bill, 1957 (supra), it was observed (at p. 986, 987) :'article 226 of the constitution confers extensive jurisdiction and power on the high courts in the states ..... election commission, india v. saka venkata rao, : [1953]4scr1144 and in re the kerala education bill, 1957, air 1958 sc 956. these supreme court decisions interpreted article 226, as it stood before the constitution (15th amendment) act, 1963, by which sub-article 1a (presently numbered as 2) was added. the historical background behind the .....

State Vs. Vishandas Motiram Malwani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR294; [1961]12STC409(Bom)

..... find any substance in mr. jethmalani's contention either because the powers under section 23 are to be exercised in course of investigation before the commencement of any proceedings under chapter vii of the act or because, if 'case' means the 'proceedings', it had already been transferred to the officers for the limited purpose of investigation under section 23 of the ..... the cash books pertaining to the business of accused no. 2, only 4 cash books were found by the officers. they were (1) from september, 1954, (2) from march, 1957, (3) from july, 1958 and (4) from march, 1959. there is no evidence on record as to what was the financial year in respect of the business of accused no ..... . 2, but it is clear that it could not in any event be more than 12 months. if we consider the cash books from march, 1957, and from july, 1958, there is a gap of more than one year. there must, therefore, necessarily be another cash book covering at least the period between 1st april .....

Teddington Chemical Kamgar Sangh Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Sangh

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1985(2)BomCR108; (1985)87BOMLR174; [1986(52)FLR11]; (1986)ILLJ384Bom; 1985MhLJ590

..... -sections of sections relating to the recognition of the union or its cancellation. there is, in our opinion, sufficient indication in the various provisions of the act and particularly in chapter iii itself, to show the provisions of ss. 12(6) and 13(1)(v) also relate to a particular undertaking, though the word 'undertaking' ..... to only one and the same undertaking for which recognition is sought or in respect of which recognition is to be cancelled. the provisions of the said chapter are by necessary implication or intendment, applicable to only one and the same undertaking for which such a recognition is sought or in respect of which ..... support of his contentions, shri deshmukh has placed strong reliance upon the decision of this court in j. g. vakharia v. regional provident fund commissioner, bombay : (1957)illj448bom and the decisions of the supreme court in forbes campell & co. ltd. v. engineering mazdoor sabha, : air1978sc340 , k. p. varghese v. income tax officer, ernakulam .....

Chandrakant Govind Deshmukh Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Colle ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1970Bom301

..... its trustees and the properties of the trust vest in the trustees only. the registrar only exercises control over them by exercising his supervisory powers conferred on him in chapter v of the act. 16. now; as regards the inquiry which the registrar holds under section 5 he is only performing the statutory duty cast on him. he neither represents the state ..... . it is a well-settled principle of construction, and it has been pointed out' by their lordships of the supreme court in r. m. d. chamarbaugwalla v. union v. india, : [1957]1scr930 ; 'now, when a question arises as to me interpretation to be put on an enactment, what the court has to do is to ascertain 'the intent of them that ..... given. he also held that the suit was barred by time, against this decision of the trial court an appeal was preferred to this court (first appeal no. 79 of 1957) and the learned single judge held that the suit was not barred by time. he however held that the suit was bad as no notice was given under section 80 .....

Abdul Rahaman D. Lambe and anr. Vs. R.N. Kulkarni and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1962Bom287; (1961)63BOMLR994; ILR1961Bom994

..... accordance with any other law. that section contemplated a distinct industrial dispute arising out of non-compliance with the provisions of that chapter. this provision was by the amending act deleted and this new procedure adopted presumably because that procedure was a cumbersome one and may have been instrumental in prolonging matters unnecessarily ..... intended that specification of the court be specifically for each case. general specification of court or tribunal would suffice. by a notification dated 12th march 1957 the state government has specified labour courts to determine the matter under s. 33-c(2). it has also delegated its powers of issuing certificates ..... determined then application for recovery could be made under sub-section (1).(5) a few facts necessary to appreciate the observations of bhagwati j. in : (1957)iillj696sc need be stated. the appellant before the supreme court was discharged by the respondent, which order of discharged by the respondent, which order of discharge .....

Ramkrishna Ramnath Vs. G. Lakshmi Narsimhan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1970Bom30; 1969MhLJ574

..... and not huf as described in all the assessment orders on him. 3-a. the income-tax officer passed similar orders for the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58. for these two years there were two separate appeals before the appellate assistant commissioner and by two separate orders these appeals were decided by the appellate assistant ..... firm. with respect to the assessment years 1951-52, 1952-53 and 1953-54 the income tax officer made the assessment orders on 30th march 1956, 9th march 1957 and 7th march 1958 respectively. these orders were challenged by the assessee in appeal before the appellate assistant commissioner of income-tax and were disposed of by him ..... . it was stated in the judgment (at pages 289-291) that the words 'assessment' and 'reassessment' occurred in several sections of chapter iv of the indian income-tax act, 1922, and that section 22 thereof laid down the whole procedure of assessment which applied not only to the first assessment, but which is also prescribed by .....

Awadhoot and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1978Bom28; 1977MhLJ689

..... as the function and rule of court is much wider and can well be educative as well as paternal in sociopolitical developments. (see; 'justice in the ussr' chapter xii by harold j. herman). we have premise to hope that land courts would function in the spirit of detachment, impartiality and by dispensation of just premises dispel ..... on record, which includes the certificate issued by the maharashtra state board of secondary education, that purushottam, son of the petitioner, was born on 11th oct. 1957. even from the other evidence on record it is quite clear that certain fields were shown in the name of purushottam ae a result of partition effected by ..... and experience about the conditions of the land and. people are clear matters of legislative indications in this regard. moreover, the purpose and the object of the act itself are sufficient guidelines for such constitution after specifying the chairman who would be of rank not below that of tahsildar. there is thus no excessive nor abdication .....

Ramkrishna Ramnath Vs. G. Lakshmi Narasimhan, Income-tax Officer, Cent ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1970]77ITR456(Bom)

..... hindu undivided family as described in all the assessment orders on him. 5. the income-tax officer passed similar orders for the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58. for these two years there were two separate appeals before the appellate assistant commissioner and by two separate orders these appeals were decided by the appellate assistant ..... . with respect to the assessment years 1951-52, 1952-53 and 1953-54 the income-tax officer made the assessment orders on 30th march, 1956, 9th march, 1957, and 7th march, 1958, respectively. these orders were challenged by the assessee in appeal before the appellate assistant commissioner of income-tax and were disposed of by him ..... . it was stated in the judgment (at pages 289-291) that the words 'assessment' and 'reassessment' occurred in several section of chapter iv of the indian income-tax act, 1922, and that section 22 thereof laid down the whole procedure of assessment, which applied not only to the first assessment, but which is also prescribed .....