Coparcener - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: coparcener Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 244 results (0.01 seconds)Maghar Singh Vs. Gurmel Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-03-2003
Reported in: (2003)135PLR636
by the trial court that the property in dispute was coparcenary property and recorded the following findings trial court while deciding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDipak Agrawala and anr. Vs. Smt. Chandrakal Agarwala and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-04-2003
Reported in: [2003(2)JCR62(Jhr)]
filed the aforementioned suit for partition of the joint family coparcenary property alleging inter alio that the deceased divided the property
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurjant Singh and ors. Vs. Surjit Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-18-2003
Reported in: AIR2004P& H257; (2004)138PLR469
the plaintiff opp2 whether the property in dispute was a coparcenary property if so its effect opd 3 whether the plaintiffs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Sarala Dhruvakumar Shukla
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-11-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Guj150
sc 751 even if the grantees are members of a coparcenary they will take as tenants in common unless a contrary
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUpendra Kumar Majumder Vs. Tapan Majumder and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-23-2003
the first instance upon the person who claims it as coparcenary property but if the possession of a nucleus of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Ramchandra Shankar Randive, Vs. Shri Uttam Marutrao Randive,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR541; 2004(1)BomCR338; 2003(3)MhLj797
not entitled to claim any right or interest in the coparcenary property during the life time of the father in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamnath Sao Alias Ramnath Sahu and ors. Vs. Goberdhan Sao and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-26-2003
Reported in: 2003(51)BLJR749
heavily lies on the parties that the property was the coparcenary property it is not necessary for the plaintiffs to plead
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhanumatiben D. Soni Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-17-2003
Reported in: (2003)4GLR40
an huf right of females to claim share in the coparcenary property it has been held that thus daughters sisters etc
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalidoss Pillai Vs. Palani Subban Pillai (Died) and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-10-2003
Reported in: (2004)1MLJ329
of a more correct interpretation of custom the theory of coparcenary system between father and sons in respect of the ancestral
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVedavalliammale and ors. Vs. Venkataraja and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-12-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)CTC581
pointed out that the respondents 1 to 3 cannot claim coparcenery right as well the deceased plaintiff the learned counsel argued
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial