Contributor - Judgment Search Results

Contributors to Pennsylvania Hospital Vs. Philadelphia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... philadelphia 245 u s 20 1917 u s supreme court contributors to pennsylvania hospital v philadelphia 245 u s 20 1917 contributors to pennsylvania hospital v city of philadelphia no 349 argued .....

Shakuntala Devi and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

virtue of the decision of the state government such as contributory provident fund and arrears of pay in the revised scale

Bengal Provincial Railway Co. Vs. Gopi Mohan Singh

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1914Cal368,(1914)ILR41Cal308

opinion must be dismissed with costs mookerjee j 7 concurred contributory negligence railway company collision damages

Brown Vs. Socialist Workers Comm.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rights of minor parties nevertheless there are important differences between disclosure of contributors and disclosure of recipients of campaign expenditures differences that the buckley court ..... through their pocketbook rather than publicly through other means disclosure of contributors directly implicates the contributors associational rights the impact on privacy interests arising from disclosure .....

Association For Democratics Reforms Vs. Union Of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... been sent to the office of the political party with the name of the contributor or the contributor could after depositing the electoral bond disclose the particulars of the contribution to ..... ensures confidentiality of the contributions made to political parties the benefit of confidentiality to contributors ensures and promotes contribution of clean money to political parties d citizens do not .....

Secundrabad Club Etc. Vs. C.i.t-v Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... cumulative conditions enumerated above 29 firstly the arrangement lacks a complete identity between the contributors and participators till the stage of generation of surplus funds the set up resembled ..... the requirement of common identity is the requirement of completeness of identity between the contributors and participators which is contemplated under the doctrine in order to determine whether .....

Walkeshwar Triveni Co-operative Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)88ITD159(Mum.)

..... in the same capacity in which they have made the contributions therefore the capacity as contributors and participants remains the same the participation envisaged in the principle of mutuality is not ..... clear that when lord macmillan speaks of the cardinal requirement being complete identity between the contributors and the participators he is not referring to individual identity but to identity as a .....

Dhfl Venture Capital Fund Vs. Income Tax Officer 19(3)(1) and Others

Court: Mumbai

..... limited to circumstances resulting from any adverse tax consequences for either the trust or the contributors or any direction of any statutory authority provided that no such revocation shall take effect ..... unless the consent of contributors holding units of that scheme representing not less than 75 of the total contributions .....

Walkeshwar Triveni Co-op. Hsg. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(7)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)267ITR86(Mum.)

..... at page 267 it has also been established that the same principle applies although the contributors incorporate themselves into a separate entity carr out the mutual scheme and the surplus contributions ..... in the same capacity in which they have made the contributions therefore the capacity as contributors and participants remains the same the participation envisaged in the principle of mutuality is .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... lawfully be funded only with hard money the ads enabled unions corporations and wealthy contributors to circumvent protections that feca was intended to provide moreover though ostensibly independent of ..... the transformation of contributions into political debate involves speech by someone other than the contributor 424 u s at 21 footnote omitted because the communicative value of large contributions .....