Contributable - Judgment Search Results

Caperton Vs. A. T. Massey Coal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and hurt the candidate s campaign the majority repeatedly characterizes blankenship s spending as contributions or campaign contributions ante at 1 3 14 17 19 but it is more accurate to ..... to unnecessary interference with judicial elections they point to no other instance involving judicial campaign contributions that presents a potential for bias comparable to the circumstances in this case which .....

The Dy. Director, Esi Corporation Vs. Amrutanjan Limited Rep. by Its D ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(4)ALT127; (2009)IVLLJ167AP

..... in excluding the conveyance and washing allowances from the purview of wages and collecting contribution is illegal section 2 22 of the act reads as hereunder wages means all ..... education allowance 16 newspaper allowance not being reimbursement foractual tuition fee 17 medical allowance 17 contribution to saving scheme 18 driver s allowance 18 commission to dealers agents19 interim relief .....

Generics (Uk) Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. H Lundbeck a/S (Resp ...

Court: House of Lords

..... case was how to separate the and enantiomers of citalopram and therefore what their respective contributions were to the anti depressant quality of citalopram having devised a novel means of separating ..... monopoly claimed with the result that those sections require an enabling disclosure of that technical contribution however in illustrating this with reference to the house 8217 s decision in biogen .....

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Jamiyyatul Falah rep. by ...

Court: Karnataka

..... with paragraphs 27 and 27a of the epf scheme 1952 employees deposit linked insurance fund contribution and administrative charges under section 6c of the act and inspection charges under section ..... organisation imparting education to children in a remote locality dependant upon donations by way of contributions to carry on its activity fell in favour with the appellate tribunal as mitigating .....

Burlington N. and S. F. R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... required remediation lends strength to the district court s conclusion that the railroad parcel contributed only nemagon and dinoseb in quantities requiring remediation the district court s conclusion ..... application vehicles mixing formulating loading and unloading of ag chemical hazardous substances which contributed most of the liability causing releases were predominantly carried out by b b .....

Biranchi Narayan Das and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 108(2009)CLT397

..... the matter vigorously in the civil court 2 as regards contribution of land for construction of drain embankment the department may ..... address the following a how many land owners have contributed land for construction of channel no 4 embankment under town ..... 8 it is pertinent to mention here that the petitioners contributed the land as required under the scheme thereafter they were .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata-iii Vs. Alom Extrusions Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2009)227CTR(SC)417; [2009]319ITR306(SC); JT2009(14)SC441; 2009(14)SCALE163; (2010)1SCC489; [2009]185TAXMAN416(SC)

..... employer s is maintaining his books on accrual system of accounting even after collecting the contribution from his employee s and even without remitting the amount to the regional provident ..... deprive the workmen of the rightful benefits under social welfare legislations by delaying payment of contributions to the welfare funds however as stated above the second proviso resulted in implementation .....

Gowri Shankar theatre represented by Its Proprietor, N. Shivaji Rao Vs ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2010)ILLJ92Mad

..... even if the number of employees has fallen below the appellant theatre is bound to contribute under the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act 1952 3 the learned counsel appearing ..... writ petition and thereby making an obligation on the appellant writ petitioner to continue to contribute under the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act 1952 19 of 1952 is not .....

The Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)5MLJ402

..... could not be taken for consideration for the purpose of contribution to the corporation as per the contention of the respondent ..... respondent is not liable to make to the payment of contribution one egambaram inspected the establishment and submitted report to the ..... is no time limit prescribed in the act for claiming contribution in nagamani cotton mills v employees state insurance corporation the .....

Metal Engineering and Treatment Co. Pvt. Ltd. (METCO) Vs. Commissioner ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 109(2010)CLT100

..... the principal employer is covered under the e s i act contribution for the employees is paid by the petitioner the issue relating ..... of benefits in case of accident disablement sickness maternity etc the contribution required to be made is not paid back even if an ..... of statutory provisions noted above the payment or non payment of contributions action or non action prior to or subsequent to the date .....