Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CONT.P.No.932 of 2012 and Sub.Appln.Nos.191,301 and 302 of 2012 Balakrishnan ... petitioner Versus 1.T.K.Rajendran Director Vigilance and Anticorruption 2.K.P.Maghendran Ex-Director Vigilance and Anticorruption Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for disobeying the orders of this court dated 27.08.2010 made in Crl.O.P.No.10255/2010. For Petitioner : Mr.Abudukumar Rajarathnam for Mr.S.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Somayaji, AGP For Intervenor : Mr.P.S.Raman Senior Counsel for Mr.V.Kuberan for Rank Associates ******* ORDER This petition seeks an order of this court punishing the respondents for contempt of its order passed in Crl.O.P. No.10255/2010 on 27.08.2010.2. In Crl.O.P.No.10255/2010 the petitioner had sought that a direction be issued to the Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai, towards registration of a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.A.(MD)No.1157 of 2013 and W.A.(MD)Nos.992 to 994 of 2013, 1015 of 2013, 1054 of 2013, 1116 of 2013, 1110 of 2013, 1107 of 2013 and 1151 to 1156 of 2013 and Writ Appeal (MD) Nos.1356 to 1369 OF2013 Cont. P.(MD) Nos.1359 to 1368 of 2013, W.A.(MD) No.1178 of 2013, 440 to 446 of 2014 and W.A.No.842 of 2013 and Review Applications:88. of 2013 and 28 of 2014, Cont.P.(MD) No.26 of 2014 W.A.No.1157/2013 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director Department of Social Welfare Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The District Social Welfare Officer, Madurai District, K.K.Nagar,Madurai. ... Appellants Vs. 1.M.Seeniammal 2.M.Vijayalakshmi 3.P.Valarmathy 4.K.Vijayakumari 5.C.Muthulakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER Writ appeal filed under Section 15 of Letters Patents Act against ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Contempt Petition (MD)No.974 of 2014 in Crime No.54 of 2014 K.S.Anwar @ Syed Anwar .Petitioner Vs 1.The State, rep.by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai City. (In Crime No.54 of 2014).2.Mr.Sridharan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai City.Respondents Petition under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the second respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in D.K.Basu versus State of West Bengal (AIR1997SC610. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 :ORDER The petitioner has come up before this Court seeking to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for not following the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in D.K.Basu versus State of West Bengal reported in (1997) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~CP-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:03. 04.2018 + CCP(CO.) 2/2017 PEACOCK TOURS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR......... Petitioners Through Mr. Kumar Abhishek Rao, Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Ms. Bhavya Bharti and Ms.Sonal Nagpal, Advs. versus FAROOQ AHMED SHALA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Arun Saxena and Ms.Priya Verma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent/contemnor for committing contempt of order dated 29.04.2016 passed in Co.A(SB) 13/2016 by wilfully disobeying the same.2. It is the case of the petitioners that the respondent is the husband of petitioner No.2.... Petitioner No.2 filed a complaint under the Protection of Women and Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the concerned M.M., Saket. During the proceedings, for putting an end to their personal differences and settling all the disputes, the parties i.e....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7652/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Ashish, Advocate for Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate versus KULDEEP KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The factual backdrop leading to filing of the above captioned petition is that on August 13, 1969 the Electronic Data Processing (hereinafter referred to as the EDP) cell started functioning in the Border Security Force.2. The respondent was appointed on the post of Key Punch Operator in the EDP cell on October 4, 1971 and was promoted to the posts of Auditor in said cell on June 17, 1980.3. On February 28, 1974 one P.B.Mishra was appointed on the post of Auditor in EDP cell and got promoted to the posts of Assistant Superinten...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. This is an application by the petitioners under Section 2(c) 11, 12 & 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India against Abdul Mueed, the respondent for initiating criminal contempt proceedings on account of allegedly filing of false affidavit in an appeal being FAO No. 262 of 2005. The said appeal was filed by an ex-employee of petitioner No.4 against dismissal of his petition under section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Cont. Case (Crl.) No. 0009/2009 Page 1 of 272. The petitioners have contended that petitioner No.1 is the Chief Muttawalli of Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) Laboratories whereas the petitioners No. 2 & 3 are other Muttawallis. The respondent Hammad Ahmed is also stated to be a Muttawalli.3. The grievances of the petitioners are that an ex-employee of Hamdard Dawakhana (Waqf) Laboratories had filed a petition under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code to institute a suit against Hamdard Dawakhana (Waqf) Laboratories and again...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239
ORDERA.N. Venugopala Gowda, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 2(c)(iii) and 12 read with Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ('the Act' for short), to initiate Criminal Contempt of Court proceedings against the accused and punish him under Section 12 of the Act. The learned Advocate General for Karnataka, has granted permission under Section 15(1)(b) of the Act, to the complainant, to initiate Criminal Contempt Proceedings against the accused.2. Brief facts, which are necessary to consider this petition, could be stated as follows:K. Kuppuswamy, S/o. Late. N. Kodandarama Naidu and his brother K. Rajalah, the accused herein, were the Directors of M/s. Chamundeswari Studio and Laboratory Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act. Said K. Kuppuswamy, has formed a Trust, under the name K.K. Foundation and Public Charitable Trust, which is registered. K. Kuppuswamy is stated to have executed a Will dated 27.09.2006, bequeathing therein, his e...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : 2005(I)OLR699
J.P. Mishra, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to the Contempt Proceeding.It is the case of the petitioner that the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'C.A.T.) directed the present opposite parties to reinstate him into service within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment and within 30 days therefrom to pay all his emoluments with effect from the date on which the petitioner was put off from duty till the day prior to his reinstatement into service. The said order was passed on 6.5.1994. Due to non-compliance of the opp.parties the petitioner filed O.J.C. No. 14751 of 1998 before this Court as the learned C.A.T. expressed his helplessness to implement his own order. In the writ (O.J.C. No. 14751 of 1998), this Court passed the order on 29.11.2000 directing the opp.parties for complying the order of learned Tribunal forthwith and allow the petitioner to joining his...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1994)2GLR1073; (1994)ILLJ655Guj
Panchal, J. 1. Whether provisions of S. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be made applicable to an application filed under S. 79(1) read with Sub-sec 3(a) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (for short 'the Act') for deciding dispute regarding propriety or legality of an order passed by an employer acting or purporting to act under the Standing Orders as postulated by Sub-clause (i) of Clause (a) of para A of Sub-section (1) of S. 78 of the Act before the Labour Court constituted under S. 9 of the Act is the question which arises for consideration in this petition filed under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. The facts giving rise to the petition may now be stated : The petitioner is a Cotton Textile Industry and is governed by the provisions of the Act. The respondent-workman was working as a permanent Patiwala in Mechanic Department of the petitioner - undertaking since December 1, 1982. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent-workman reported f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Reported in : 2012CrLJ1843
Katakey, J. 1. This appeal, by the contemnors, is directed against the order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge recording prima facie satisfaction of commission of contempt of Court in violating the order dated 26.08.2010 passed in WP(C) No.378/2010 and drawing up the contempt proceeding against them, which was registered and numbered as Cont.Cas(C) No.20/2010, and asking them to show-cause as to why action under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (in short the 1971 Act) shall not be taken and appropriate punishment for contempt of court shall not be awarded. 2. The facts relevant for the purpose of the present appeal may be noticed as under: (i) The Govt. of Tripura, Education (School) Department, vide notification dated 16.04.2007, initially brought the New Hindi Secondary (Hindi and English medium) School, Khejurbagan, Agartala, under the State Grant-in-Aid scheme of the Education (School) Department w.e.f. 01.04.2007, thereby bringing all the existing 2...
Tag this Judgment!