Consuming - Judgment Search Results

Gujarat Electricity Board Vs. Consumer Education Research Center and o ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1981)22GLR1076

..... to gradually commit suicide by incurring continuous losses upon a petitioner claiming to represent the consumers declaring in emphatic words that it is being run inefficiently and in an uneconomic manner ..... by the board 7 this application has been strongly resisted by the original petitioners namely consumer education research center and its co petitioners it has been strenuously argued that the .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Consumer Education and Research Centre and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1981Guj233; (1981)0GLR1103

divan c j 1 this review application has been filed by the state of gujarat in respect of the orders...

Consumer Education and Research Centre and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat a ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1981)22GLR712

..... reliefs as the nature of the case may require 3 the first petitioner is the consumer education research centre hereinafter referred for brevity sake as c e r c it is .....

Delhi Consumers' Co-operative Wholesale Store Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1981Delhi351; [1981]47STC443(Delhi)

..... be made by the learned assistant commissioner under section 20 3 2 m s delhi consumers co operative wholesale store ltd karampura new delhi were registered dealers under the bengal finance .....

South Asia Industries (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1981Delhi196

leila seth j 1 at the instance of the assessed the income tax appellate tribunal has referred for our opinion...

Maryland Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... discrimination against interstate commerce arizona brought the suit in its proprietary capacity as a consumer of electricity generated in new mexico and as parens patriae for its citizens arizona ..... ocs wells through processing plants in louisiana and through interstate pipelines to the ultimate consumers in over 30 states constitutes interstate commerce louisiana argues that the taxable uses within .....

American Express Co. Vs. Koerner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... transactions that were the subject of the underlying dispute cannot be characterized as extensions of consumer credit these transactions involved either charges for flight insurance added to the cost of ..... iv because congress has restricted the operation of 161 a to disputes concerning extensions of consumer credit and because the dispute between american express and respondent did not concern an .....

Anderson Bros. Ford Vs. Valencia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... comment official staff interpretation fc 0173 regarding security interest disclosures in closed end consumer credit transactions 45 fed reg 63295 although the staff recognized that several courts ..... of striking the proper balance is an empirical process that entails investigation into consumer psychology and that presupposes broad experience with credit practices administrative agencies are better .....

Commonwealth Edison Co. Vs. Montana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... levied on an activity conducted within the state the exploitation by foreign corporations or consumers of intrastate opportunities under the protection and encouragement of local government offers a basis ..... of alberta canada recently had raised sharply its royalty on natural gas thereby forcing consumers of alberta gas in montana and elsewhere to finance involuntarily alberta s universities hospitals .....

Madhya Pradesh Ration Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur and ors. Vs. State of Ma ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1981MP203

..... the formulation and implementation of a scheme of rationing for equitable distribution of foodffrains to consumers in days of scarcity is a vary important governmental activity of a welfare state see ..... such societies refuse to accept appointment as agent that others can be considered for appointment consumers co operative societies stand as a class from others there is a reasonable basis for .....