Constructive Delivery - Judgment Search Results

Suzuki and Co. Ltd. Vs. Uttamlal Maneklal

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR572

..... to take delivery and insisted on an invoice of goods imported direotly by the plaintiffs negativing defendant s contention on construction of the ..... under the contract the buyers should forthwith pay for and take delivery of them within seven clear days 3 the plaintiffs should ..... goods imported directly by the plaintiffs and refused to take delivery after the suit was filed the defendants asked for a .....

Cement Manufacturers' Assn. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... common use by manufacturers of cement whereby cement is sold for future delivery for use in a specific piece of construction which is described in the contract as was stated in the ..... future to the purchaser at a maximum price named payable on delivery the cement required to complete a specified piece of construction work but allowing the purchaser the advantage of any decline .....

Hem Chandra Jelia and ors. Vs. Satya Kinkar Sen and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 91Ind.Cas.835

..... the kabuliyat in the event of non delivery of the paddy it has been held upon a construction of the contract in some cases ..... and the registration fee payable 9 that is a matter of construction and having regard to all the terms of the kabuliyat there ..... appeal is accordingly dismissed with costs cuming j 12 i agree construction of document landlord and tenant kabuliyat providing for payment of rent .....

The Coorla Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Limited Vs. Vallabhdas K ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1925Bom547; (1925)27BOMLR1168; 94Ind.Cas.575

..... were bound to take delivery of the 75 bales offered on march 1 1921 on the true construction of the suit contract ..... too late as the schedule to the contract stipulated for delivery from november to february and not for manufacture throughout those ..... mohanlal s promises the plaintiffs shewed further forbearance and withheld delivery voluntarily at his request but this further extension unlike the .....

Barrett Vs. Van Pelt

Court: US Supreme Court

..... requirement that suit be instituted within two years respondent supports this construction but we think it is not satisfactory the language does ..... as a condition precedent to recovery at the time of the delivery of the property for transportation the express company issued and ..... to show what was a reasonable time for such transportation and delivery it follows that there was nothing to give rise to .....

G.i.P. Railway Company Vs. A.B. Tamboli

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR718

..... to that view by holding that the ejusdem generis rule of construction applies so that the words fire or robbery in a running ..... to the bales in question the subordinate judge says that his construction is obviously right because else even if fire was intentionally caused ..... given delivery of to the consignee the words bafore during and after transit are too clear to be open to any other construction and .....

A. B. Small Co. Vs. Lamborn and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... delivery optional with the seller and therefore showing a want of mutuality but in our opinion the clauses are not open to that construction ..... buyer might be accorded the privilege of calling for special deliveries known as withdrawals during the prescribed period if the ..... entirely consistent with the seller s definite agreement to make delivery within the period prescribed the other clause was to .....

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Sloss-sheffield Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reparation in a proceeding to reduce future rates should not be limited by a narrow construction to losses suffered by the complaining shipper before the proceeding was begun thus excluding those ..... were made under a standard form of contract which was applicable to sales for future delivery in installments and which contained a provision substantially as follows price fourteen dollars and eighty .....

Kansas City Structural Steel Co. Vs. Arkansas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... first obtaining permission to do business in arkansas a missouri corporation successfully bid for the construction of an arkansas bridge executed the contract in arkansas executed a bond sublet all ..... plaintiff in error in arkansas before obtaining the permission constitute or include intrastate business the delivery of the materials to the subcontractor was essential to the building of the bridge .....

Katreddi Ramiah and anr. Vs. Kadiyala Venkata Subbamma and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad434; 94Ind.Cas.83; (1926)50MLJ308

..... aside the learned subordinate judge in the court below found on a construction of the will that there was no appointment of the 1st ..... the plaintiff s claim was for having these alienations set aside and delivery over to the plaintiffs of certain lands alleged to have been ..... death of the testator or in the alternative for a partition and delivery over to them of their shares in the estate of the .....