Skip to content


Constructive Contempt - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constructive contempt Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 151 results (0.085 seconds)
Nov 02 2007 (SC)

Y.N. Gangadhara Setty and ors. Vs. Jaya Prakash Reddy, Md, Karnataka C ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-02-2007

Reported in: AIR2008SC640; 2008(1)AWC505(SC); 2008(1)KarLJ11; 2007(12)SCALE680; 2007AIRSCW7730; AIR2008SC640; 2008(1)CivilLJ839; 2008(1)LH(SC)520; 2008(1)ICC288; 2008(2)KLJ11

..... to applicant started new constructions over it applicant filed contempt petition against respondent held respondent will demolish new construction and hand over the property to applicant contempt of courts act 1971 ..... over the possession till date instead of giving the possession the contemnor herein made construction over the disputed land 9 the erstwhile partners and successors in interest of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 2007 (HC)

In Re: Sri V. Satyanarayana Rao S/O. Sri V.C. Rao

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-11-2007

Reported in: 2007(6)ALT294

..... since this technical defect would fall in the domain of contempt he was tendering his unconditional apology he denies having raised any construction after the injunction order was passed by the principal ..... not committed contempt gives a detailed factual backdrop of the case he would deny the appellants contention that under the guise of the impugned judgment he had started constructing walls and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 2007 (SC)

Palitana Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Smt. Vilasiniben Ramachand ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-20-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC1701; 2007(2)AWC1838(SC); JT2007(5)SC83; (2007)3MLJ735(SC); 2007(4)SCALE514

..... right to construct residential building 6 we heard mr mukul rohatgi learned senior counsel for the petitioner in the contempt petition and ..... given the petitioners the development and building permissions required to construct on the lands in question in our opinion the ..... residential use thus depriving the petitioner of the right to construct residential houses the action of the respondents and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2007 (HC)

Ajab Lal Vs. Rakesh Kumar Mishra and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-30-2007

Reported in: AIR2007All158; 2007(3)AWC2783

..... abetted the same by permitting the raising of such constructions hence a clear case of contempt is made out making the opposite parties liable for ..... party nos 4 and 5 in particular have proceeded to raise construction over the land in dispute it is further alleged that the ..... the said opposite party has not permitted the raising of any constructions and rather to the contrary has passed orders on 27 11 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 2007 (HC)

V.D. Kavatkar Vs. Fatima Huseni Radhapurwala and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-27-2007

Reported in: 2007(6)ALLMR663; 2008(1)BomCR346

..... timber being carried out in the premises in reply to the charge of contempt he pleaded that he constructed 12 cabins not mentioned earlier which are temporary in nature he mentioned that ..... the premises to various persons by allowing them to do business in the cabins specially constructed 6 the respondent no 2 denied the allegations the trial court after hearing the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 2007 (HC)

Maharaj Singh Vs. Shakuntala Jhaku and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-18-2007

Reported in: (2007)4PLR531

..... dismissed 3 therefore the present petitioner has filed this contempt petition alleging that respondents no 4 and 5 have raised unauthorized construction over the gair mumkin pahar in village ananpur 4 ..... and 5 are also the co sharers and are in exclusive possession of land where construction has been raised the matter regarding partition between the proprietors and the municipal corporation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2007 (HC)

R. Rajamani S/O. Ramasami Gounder and ors. Vs. the Government of Tamil ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-27-2007

Reported in: (2007)3MLJ918

..... the appellants before the supreme court proceeded with the construction and completed the same however the high court held such appellants guilty of contempt by observing in the instant case the respondents ..... extended thereafter the appellants showed respect to the order of the court by stopping the construction as soon as the injunction order was received after the expiry of three weeks when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 2007 (HC)

Goyal Mg Gases Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Air Liquid Deutchland Gambh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-15-2007

Reported in: 141(2007)DLT426; 2007(96)DRJ275

..... 1scr319 7 in some cases courts have pierced the corporate veil in contempt proceedings see delhi development authority v skipper construction company pvt ltd reported in 57 1995 dlt 737 however the ..... injunction order was passed against the respondent no 3 it is thereforee obvious that no contempt proceedings could have been initiated against the respondent no 4 for giving financial and technical .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 2007 (HC)

Kanchild Mal and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-12-2007

Reported in: 2007(99)DRJ406

..... has not obtained any sanction of building premises for construction of a residential building and would suffer the consequences of perjury and contempt of court if the affidavit is found to be ..... he had not obtained any sanction of building premises for construction of a residential building besides rendering himself liable to perjury and contempt why no such affidavit was filed there is no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2007 (HC)

Arvind Kumar Tiwary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Feb-17-2007

Reported in: [2007(4)JCR196(Jhr)]

..... interference in exercise of review jurisdiction is warranted government of jharkhand ranchi inviting tender for construction of tube well in various circles throughout the state of jharkhand whereas the contractors ..... m karpaga vinayagam cjm y eqbal amareshwar sahay r k merathia narendra nath tiwari jj contempt proceedings review powers of high court held article 215 of the constitution vests the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //