Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: guwahati Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 49 results (1.058 seconds)Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee Vs. the State
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jun-25-1958
conspiracy for murdering the complainant under section 120b of the indian penal code the defence case was that the accused were application under section 561 a of the code of criminal procedure for expunging certain remarks made by mr b c hazarika evidence had been given by the defence on the point therefore the speculation that the drafting of the petition and the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaibam Bidhu Singh and ors. Vs. Manipur Administration
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Aug-21-1958
interfere with that discretion in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction 6 in the course of arguments it was stated that afraid to give evidence against them the learned sessions judge therefore cancelled the bail and committed the petitioners to custody 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanchamani Saha Vs. Kshir Babu Sinha
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jul-09-1958
widow aged 50 or more of village routkhola within the jurisdiction of bishalgarh police station who was convicted under section 420 a revision petition under section 439 of the cr p code filed by smt ban chamani saha an illiterate widow aged for the same amount no reason has been assigned why therefore the complainant was anxious to buy back the land and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Rowell Roy Vs. Ka Thili Nonglyer
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jul-04-1958
entitled to prefer a claim for compensation there is no power given to the commissioner under section 10a to determine the by the counsel for the appellant is that the proper procedure was not followed in the case section 10a of the not been gone into by the commissioner in the result therefore we are of opinion that the order of the commissioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagadindra Nath Gupta Vs. Inspector General of Assam Rifles and ors.
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Sep-02-1958
with the procedure laid down in article 311 of the constitution in our opinion such a limited construction could not he the petitioner was convicted for an offence under section 408 indian penal code for misappropriation of a sum of rs 1 limited construction could not he put upon proviso a to article 311 2 of the constitution the plain grammatical meaning of rule there is no such declaration made by the appointing authority as contemplated by that clause the order of appointment shows 311 of the constitution and in the absence of any procedure adopted under that article for the discharge of the petitioner general may issue from time to time we are not therefore satisfied on the facts disclosed in the petition that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBirendra Nath Guha Vs. Commissioner of Taxes
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : May-05-1958
the tax is hit by article 286 2 of the constitution and section 3 1a iii of the assam act so was placed by the advocate general on the case of indian coffee board v state of madras 1956 7 s t are outside sales and are not covered by explanation to article 286 1 a are also hit by article 286 2 explanation to article 286 1 a it will not give power to this state to tax these sales as they are they will be immune from state taxation until and unless parliament by law otherwise provides the provisions of article 286 2 with effect from the commencement of the assam sales tax amendment act 1954 every dealer whose gross turnover from sales which co since reported in 1958 9 s t c 467 civil appeal no 230 of 1956 24 coming to the latter the purview of the definition of sale and it will therefore have to be seen whether sales where the goods are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaisnam Baruniton Singh Vs. Thokchom Ningol Haisnam Ongbi Bhani Devi a ...
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jan-30-1958
this legislation does not contravene article 25 1 of the constitution 19 the further observatioas in that case were to the legislative enactment 15 article 25 2 of the constitution of india also gives the state ample power to make laws governing to their personal law and thus offends the provisions of article 15 1 of the constitution ii that the population of of the constitution of india also gives the state ample power to make laws governing such matters even if they were indian constitution subject to their personal law vests in the parliament as well as state legislatures by virtue of its inclusion american reports viz he further pointed out that the first amendment could not be invoked as a protection against legislation for unusual application under section 561 a of the cr p code for quashing the proceedings under section 494 ipo that are that monogamy is a very desirable and praiseworthy institution if therefore the state of bombay compels hindus to become monogamists it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhindra Kumar Deb and ors. Vs. the State of Assam and ors.
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jul-10-1958
then filed the present petition under article 226 of the constitution praying for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing estate in the year 1953 as the representative of the indian tea employees union at silchar petitioner no 2 in the case 8 the petitioner then filed the present petition under article 226 of the constitution praying for a direction in the that if under an act the central govt has a power to issue notifications orders rules or bye laws that power 1950 was repealed by the provisions of the industrial disputes amending act on 28 8 1956 but section 33 c came argued that the subsisting rights cannot be enforced under the procedure provided in the amending act section 33 c has been to extend it by a fresh notification that case is therefore no authority for the proposition that the reference if once
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnowar HussaIn and anr. Vs. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee and ors.
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jun-27-1958
they were not contrary to the relevant provision of the constitution as pleaded 50 the result therefore is that the appeal to arrest sri aioy mukherjee of barpeta under section 436 indian penal code the whole chit was written and signed by plaintiff respondent is right in con tending that the specific article applicable to the case is article 19 of the limitation but acts done in the exercise of sovereign or governmental powers such as making a treaty or commandeering private property for that the situation was such that the chief minister the parliamentary secretary and the deputy commissioner had personally reached the place cognizance of any offence under section 190 1 a criminal procedure code he must not only have applied his mind to as an officer subordinate to the sub divisional magistrate he therefore thought that this officer acted in good faith and was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBindu Nath Chaudhury Vs. the State of Assam and ors.
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Nov-24-1958
in violation of the provisions of article 311 of the constitution of india and 3 that the order was bad for of the provisions of article 311 of the constitution of india and 3 that the order was bad for violation of 5 in regard to the contention that the provision of article 311 was violated we might say that this contention as heads 1 that the state government did not enjoy the power of reviewing its own order 2 that the order in no substance since the petitioner at no time held a civil post though it is not necessary for us to examine the charge and responsibilities having remained with jatindra nath chaudhury therefore the power enjoyed by the state government to review its
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT