Consignment - Year 1983 - Judgments

Dec 20 1983 (TRI)

Navrang Dyeing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-20-1983

Reported in: (1984)(17)ELT357Tri(Mum.)bai

..... to let him know the approximate time within which he could expect the release of consignment the assistant collector was non committal but after considerable persuasion she condescended to dispose of ..... have made a declaration before the assistant drug controller that they had already sold the consignment on the basis of high seas sale to mercury laboratories which declaration was subsequently found .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1983 (HC)

Hamilton Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of B ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-24-1983

Reported in: AIR1983Bom248; 1984(1)BomCR316

..... by the customs 15 the defendants however admitted that the consignment in suit was detained by the customs for import trade ..... wharfage charges from the plaintiffs in respect of the suit consignment in accordance with the provisions of the bombay port trust ..... wharfage charges from the plaintiff in respect of the suit consignment in accordance with the provisions of major port trusts decree .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1983 (HC)

Shaw Scott Distilleries Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sales Tax Officer an ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-21-1983

Reported in: [1983]54STC344(All)

..... of the goods permissible under section 13 a of the act they prayed that the consignment be released forthwith when the respondents which includes the functionaries of the sales tax department ..... without jurisdiction it is obvious that consequential proceedings for imposing penalty in respect of the consignment aforesaid under section 13 a could not follow for breach of the provisions of section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1983 (HC)

JaIn Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-13-1983

Reported in: [1983]53STC54(All)

..... make necessary declarations in case where the goods have been consigned to regular transport agencies which undertake to transport goods from ..... of similar nature or otherwise notified under section 42 any consignment of such goods exceeding such quantity as may be specified ..... steamer station airport post office or any other place any consignment of such goods exceeding the quantity specified with a view .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 1983 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Straw Products Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-06-1983

Reported in: AIR1984Cal291

..... was recovered from the plaintiff in excess of concessional ratesin respect of the said different consignments booked during the period with effect from 20th feb 1963 the south eastern railway ..... the correspondence between the parties clearly prove that after having allowed the plaintiff to transport consignments at concessional rates between the 23rd october 1961 to 19th october 1962 the station .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 1983 (HC)

Jadu Nath Paul Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-15-1983

Reported in: 1983LC793D(Calcutta)

..... trade and payment arrangement the customs authority had allowed the petitioner to clear the said consignment without levying any import duty on 1st march 1978 the assistant collector of customs calcutta ..... desh from payment of either basic or auxiliary duty the petitioner had imported the aforesaid consignment of kapok on 25th january 1974 when balanced trade payment arrangements were in force .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 1983 (TRI)

Cougar International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-24-1983

Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT310TriDel

..... trading corporation of india stc in august september 1977 9 consignments of tapioca chips were exported from cochin under 9 separate ..... exporters copies of the 9 shipping bills covering the 9 consignments in question he stated that through courtesy of the learned ..... for industrial use the department did not dispute that these consignments might have been made for industrial use the department did .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1983 (TRI)

National Textile Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-18-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC1561Tri(Chennai)

..... was withdrawn and that as such the subsequent withdrawal could not have effected this consignment import in respect whereto had been completed during the operation of the exemption ..... territorial waters while touching calling at other ports for the purpose of discharging other consignments his lordships highlighted the incongruities resulting from such an interpretation observing that this would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1983 (TRI)

K.S. Diesels Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-29-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC1383DTri(Delhi)

..... consisting of three orders in original pertaining to three different consignments covered by separate bills of entry and there should have ..... his arguments that in the case of the latter two consignments the collector had wrongly held that the normally admissible period ..... one of the submissions is that in respect of two consignments the collector mistakenly took the view that the shorter period .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 1983 (HC)

E.i.D. Parry (India) Limited Vs. Far Eastern Marine Transport Co. Ltd. ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-02-1983

Reported in: (1988)1MLJ144

..... of the cargo it was found that in respect of the first consignment covered by bill of lading no pk m20 45 out of ..... the plaintiff company is entitled to the goods covered by the suit consignment and how the suit is maintainable this defendant is not aware ..... to how the plaintiff is entitled to the goods covered by the consignment and the suit is not therefore maintainable ex p1 invoice clearly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Consignment - Judgment Search Results