Skip to content


Consider - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: consider Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 13,786 results (0.225 seconds)
Jan 01 2004 (TRI)

Kabul Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-01-2004

Reported in: (2005)(99)ECC509

..... 2004 heard for final orders on 12 1 2004 3 after hearing both sides and considering the materials on record and also the fact that the subject imports were made in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Emerson Network Power India P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

..... of carrier aircon ltd v cce 2003 57 rlt 134 the tribunal has held while considering a contract for supply and installation and commissioning like in the present case that installation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Himson Textile Engg. Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

..... conceded that while the supreme court in the remand order ruled that the tribunal should consider the ratio of the judgment in mahindra amp mahindra ltd and maruti udyog ltd the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Indian Lead Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT336Tri(Mum.)bai

..... caused on account of a death in the family of the counsel for the appellants considering the ground stated in the application for condonation of delay i am of the view .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Sri Sarvaraya Sugars Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

..... 269 trib ect in support of their contention 3 we have perused the records and considered the submissions made by both sides the appellant has been claiming different prices for ex .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Jay Vee Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs (E)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT287Tri(Mum.)bai

..... were allowed to be exported provisionally he therefore ordered that the export should not be considered as one under d e e c licence he also imposed a penalty of rs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Kamal Kanaiyalal Lohia Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT590Tri(Mum.)bai

..... they were only asked to conduct a visual examination of the goods and give their considered opinion but m s sgs conducted chemical test as well and found that all fittings .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Mehrotra Engg. Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT187Tri(Kol.)kata

..... above order did not succeed before the commissioner appeals hence the present appeal 3 after considering the submissions made by both sides i find that the appellants had taken a categorical .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Securipax India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC589

..... final product after examining the rival contentions we note that the relevant rule to be considered is not rule 57a referred to by counsel but rule 57ab 1 relied on by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (TRI)

Waterbase Limited Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC40

..... as a matter of administrative convenience hence flood lights street lights wireless equipment cannot be considered as brought in connection with the manufacture of the goods hence the benefit of exemption .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //