Conserver - Judgment Search Results

S. Narasimha Bhandary Vs. V. Vijaya Bai

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1978Kant115; ILR1978KAR752; 1978(1)KarLJ429

..... and having a distinct language script or culture of their own to conserve the same held article 29 1 applies to any section of ..... have a fundamental right to protect their language script or culture and conserve the same article 29 1 do not control the rights conferred under ..... language script or culture of its own has the fundamental right to conserve the same this is a right which is conferred on both .....

Nassim Jani Vs. Lt. Governor

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1979RLR41

..... of the detention customs detention order section 24 of evidence act section 3 1 of conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act 1974 and article 22 5 of .....

G.S. Bakshi and ors. Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC569; 1979CriLJ476; (1978)4SCC482; [1979]43STC271(SC)

..... order prosecution and to sign prosecution sheets in respect of cases concerning the health and conservancy departments the third order was made on april 7 1951 on the eve of the .....

Avadh Raj Singh Vs. Jugal Kishore Gupta

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1148; (1979)4SCC328; 1979(11)LC1(SC)

..... between the landlords and the tenants as to the duration of the tenancies and to conserve building materials by maintaining existing buildings for purposes for which the leases were granted restriction .....

Maneka Sanjay Gandhi and anr. Vs. Rani Jethmalani

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC468; 1979CriLJ458; (1979)4SCC167; [1979]2SCR378; 1979(11)LC120(SC)

..... 32 of the constitution the three petitioners who were detained under section 3 of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act 1974 contended that in the matter .....

Mohan Singh, Advocate Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1095; 1978CriLJ844; (1978)2SCC366; [1978]3SCR127; 1978(10)LC606(SC)

..... that while the appellant and his parents appear to have been of an orthodox and conservative outlook and bent of mind the respondent and her parents apparently did not set much .....

Shahul Hamid Ismail Shahbendray Patel Vs. Shri R.D. Pradhan

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1978)80BOMLR440

..... detention were also communicated to the detenus as required under section 3 3 of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act 1974 hereinafter referred to as the ..... result therefore the petitions fail and are dismissed rule in both the petitions is discharged conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act lii of 1974 sections 3 1 .....

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. Vs. Nrdc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reopen the proceedings the commission first ruled it was required to consider only energy conservation alternatives which were reasonably available would in their aggregate effect curtail demand for ..... states in 1973 there was little serious thought in most government circles of energy conservation alternatives indeed the council on environmental quality did not promulgate regulations which even .....

Tennessee Valley Auth. Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... urging tva to consider alternatives to damming the little tennessee local citizens and national conservation groups brought suit in the district court claiming that the project did not conform ..... going and substantial resources have already been expended the conflict between national incentives to conserve living things and the pragmatic momentum to complete the project on schedule is most .....

BaldwIn Vs. Fish and Game Comm'n of Montana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dissent that the state s need or desire to engender political support for its conservation programs cannot by itself justify an otherwise invidious classification memorial hospital v maricopa ..... enforcement costs the presence of nonresident hunters imposes on montana and the state s conservation expenditures supported by resident borne taxes their position throughout this litigation has been that .....