Conservancy - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: conservancy Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 212 results (0.008 seconds)Dy. Conservator of Forest Vs. Shramjivi General Workers' Union
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-10-2000
Reported in: [2001(89)FLR213]; (2001)ILLJ458Guj
..... union and those demands are as under 1 those rojamdar employees serving under the deputy conservator of forest extension division at banaskantha in banaskantha district in various sub divisions should ..... list of the employees working under the district office and divisional office of the deputy conservator extension division banaskantha except the aforesaid two demands rest of the demands have been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasavaraj Rayappa Kengeri and Others Vs. Three Officer/Deputy Conserva ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Kant180; ILR2000KAR1348; 2000(2)KarLJ565
..... the forest area and not in sy no 26 in view of this the deputy conservator of forests has written a letter dated 6 3 1993 to the deputy commissioner karwar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUpendra Mishra Vs. the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Anoth ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-06-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)WLC54; 2001(1)WLN161
..... to the appellant the departmental enquiry under rule 17 is pending against him the dy conservator of forest is not competent to issue annex 10 which is totally arbitrary according to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuryabhan S/O. Rangnath Sarowar Vs. Divisional Soil Conservation Offic ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-17-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALLMR508; 2001(2)BomCR288; [2000(86)FLR807]; (2000)IIILLJ1044Bom
r j kochar j 1 the petitioner has challenged under article 227 of the constitution of india the judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.S. Yadiyurappa Vs. Mahalingappa and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2000
Reported in: AIR2001Kant61; ILR2000KAR4449; 2001(2)KarLJ577
..... and having a distinct language script or culture of their own to conserve the same held article 29 1 applies to any section of ..... have a fundamental right to protect their language script or culture and conserve the same article 29 1 do not control the rights conferred under ..... language script or culture of its own has the fundamental right to conserve the same this is a right which is conferred on both .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Manjeti Laxmi Kantha Rao (D) by L.Rs. and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC2220; 2000(3)ALLMR(SC)664; 2001(1)BLJR473; JT2000(4)SC157; 2000(3)SCALE61; (2000)3SCC689; [2000]2SCR937
..... between the landlords and the tenants as to the duration of the tenancies and to conserve building materials by maintaining existing buildings for purposes for which the leases were granted restriction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTErappa Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-19-2000
Reported in: ILR2000KAR4706; 2001(3)KarLJ117
..... mines and minerals regulation and development act 67 of 1957 section 5 11 3 forest conservation act 1980 section 2 mineral concession rules 1960 rule 630 a p d dinakaran c .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Sprint Rpg India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs-i, Delhi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-20-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC749; 2000(67)ECC585; 2000LC735(SC); 2000(116)ELT6(SC); JT2000(1)SC371; 2000(1)SCALE300; (2000)2SCC486; [2000]1SCR332
..... justification or iv it is necessary to take any such action for the purpose of conserving any resources of national importance or b any industrial undertaking is being managed in a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Medchl Chemicals and Pharma P. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Biological E. Ltd. a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-25-2000
Reported in: 2000(1)ALD(Cri)729; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)279; 2000(2)ALT49(SC); 2000CriLJ1487; JT2000(2)SC426; RLW2000(1)SC165; 2000(2)SCALE88; (2000)3SCC269; [2000]1SCR1169
..... that while the appellant and his parents appear to have been of an orthodox and conservative outlook and bent of mind the respondent and her parents apparently did not set much .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Laljit Rajshi Shah and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC937; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)720; 2000CriLJ1494; JT2000(2)SC546; 2000(2)SCALE126; (2000)2SCC699; [2000]1SCR1239; 2000(2)LC915(SC)
..... 32 of the constitution the three petitioners who were detained under section 3 of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act 1974 contended that in the matter .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial