Consent - Judgment Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Kumar Trading Co.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2000(72)ECC748,2000(121)ELT18(Cal)

ashok kumar mathur c j 1 this is an appeal directed against the order dated 1st february 1999 passed by...

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. R.P. Tiwari and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(3)MPHT245

order1 bar council of india created under the advocates act 1961 and the apex body of the advocates under the...

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

..... unwise and impracticable to impose an administrative authority by a judicial decree without the unanimous consent and approval of the parties according to the plaintiff since scheme b provided for a ..... that the three states maharashtra the then mysore presently karnataka and andhra pradesh having themselves consented to and having prayed for the method of allocation to be adopted by the tribunal .....

Araj Sk. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2001CriLJ416

..... any of the six following descriptions first against her will secondly without her consent thirdly with her consent when her consent has been obtained by putting her or any person in whom she ..... had not the requisite mental maturity or power of understanding of the consequences of such consent given by her the ld trial judge had drawn a distinction between the educated enlightened .....

Durai Murugan and ors. Vs. State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2001CriLJ215

..... exercises its judicial discretion by considering such materials and on such consideration either gives consent or declines consent the section should not be construed to mean that the court has to give ..... sustained as already stated the power of the court under section 321 in giving consent or refusing consent is supervisory in character when both the prosecution and witnesses accused are not willing .....

Subhash Mohan Dev Vs. Santosh Mohan Dev and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: [2001]104CompCas404(Gauhati)

..... by him the petitioners have discharged their obligations under the consent terms by bringing necessary funds to the company to ..... proportional representation on the board there is nothing in the consent terms governing thesubsequent conducts of the parties nor the ..... counsel submitted that no appeal is maintainable against a consent order the appellant is estopped from challenging the consensual .....

Shiraz Golden Restaurant Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2000(86)FLR978],(2000)IILLJ1101Cal

..... can be allowed to be represented by a legal practitioner although consent of the party to the disputes is one of the ..... such requirement and therefore it cannot be held that an implied consent is negatived by the statute the case of engineering mazdoor ..... also the conduct of the consenting party consent can be implied the section does not insist upon a written consent consent once given cannot be .....

Azim Hashan Premji Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)3GLR400

..... steps the accused were forced to obtain the requisite consent order that the consent order granted for discharging the trade effluent under ..... accused had violated the terms and conditions prescribed in the consent order and for a considerable time the accused had been ..... to in it sub section 2 creates vicarious liability of consenting conniving or negligent directors and other officers referred in it .....

Jaychand Dipchand Kasliwal Vs. Shirish S/O Vasantrao Kotwal and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(2)ALLMR99; 2001(2)BomCR350

..... that respondent no 1 s agents and other persons with the consent of respondent no 1 published false statement in relation to the ..... proves that respondent no 1 and his agents and active workers with consent of respondent no 1 interfered with free exercise of rights of ..... the respondent no 1 his agents and other persons with the consent of the respondent no 1 distributed in the constituency false and .....

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the other the court need not accept the united states invitation to look behind the consent judgment at pre settlement stipulations and memoranda purportedly demonstrating that the judgment was grounded ..... theory over the other nor was any such election required to gain approval for the consent judgment the special master s assumption that the settlement necessarily and universally relinquished the .....