Consensual - Judgment Search Results

Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice Secr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... were inconsistent with the constitution of fiji drawing a clear distinction between consensual and non consensual sexual behavior what the constitution requires is that the law acknowledges difference ..... privacy equality and individual autonomy to move beyond decriminalisation of offences involving consensual same sex relationships decriminalisation is of course necessary to bury the ghosts of .....

Lawrence Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... guarantee of equal protection of the laws 2 whether petitioners criminal convictions for adult consensual sexual intimacy in the home violate their vital interests in liberty and privacy protected ..... of nonenforcement suggests the moribund character today of laws criminalizing this type of private consensual conduct the sweeping references by chief justice burger to the history of western civilization .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... from various constitutional provisions which we shall deal presently 318 dr singhvi submitted that non consensual transfer was against the very spirit of the doctrine of separation of powers contained in ..... jeopardise independence of judiciary otherwise guaranteed by the constitution it was held that a non consensual transfer is within the purview of article 222 797 on the question of policy transfers .....

U.S. Vs. Ron Pair Enterprises

Court: US Supreme Court

..... post petition interest c respondent urges that pre code practice drew a distinction between consensual and nonconsensual liens for the purpose of determining entitlement to post petition interest and ..... based on the distinction between types of liens as well as equitable considerations unlike consensual liens to which the parties voluntarily agree nonconsensual liens depend for their existence only .....

Mr. Santhosh Shetty, Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... case of pramod suryabhan pawar v state of maharashtra1 has drawn distinction between rape and consensual sexual relationships delineating the inter play between promise of marriage and allegation of rape the ..... 376 ipc was made out admittedly the appellant and the second respondent were in a consensual relationship from 2013 until december 2017 they are both educated adults the second respondent .....

Jer Rutton Kavasmanek and anr. Vs. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

..... their specific shares do not impose restriction on the transferability of shares further such consensual agreements between particular shareholders relating to their shares can be enforced like any other ..... freely transferable in section 111a does not mean that the shareholder cannot enter into consensual arrangement agreement with the third party proposed transferee in relation to his specific shares .....

Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... we hold and declare that 1 section 497 lacks an adequately determining principle to criminalize consensual sexual activity and is manifestly arbitrary section 497 is a denial of substantive equality as ..... and white however such liberty must accommodate public interest the freedom to 55 have a consensual sexual relationship outside marriage by a married person does not warrant protection under article .....

Cox And Kings Ltd. Vs. Sap India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... legal bases for making a non signatory a party can be classified as consensual and non consensual the consensual theories that are focused on determining the mutual intent of the parties include ..... veil estoppel succession and apparent authority 37 the formulation of these principles whether consensual or non consensual is not new they are derived from general principles of contractual law and .....

Shivadhanush. T. G.@ Beerappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... would vehemently contend that the relationship between the 1st petitioner and the 2nd respondent was consensual it was not 6 nc 2024 khc 44797 crl p no 9120 of 2024 for ..... relationship therefore the learned counsel would submit that the consent of the complainant for a consensual act is implicit throughout it is her submission that the consent cannot be dubbed as .....

Girinath B Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... petitioner and the complainant if further proceedings are permitted to be continued on such consensual acts of the complainant with the petitioner contending that it would attract ingredients of ..... of pramod suryabhan pawar v state of maharashtra1 has drawn distinction between rape and consensual sexual relationships while delineating inter play between promise of marriage and allegation of rape .....