Conjunction - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: conjunction Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 155 results (0.011 seconds)M/S B.T. and F.C. (Pvt.) Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Karnataka State Pollution ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-1997
Reported in: ILR1997KAR2244; 1997(3)KarLJ199
..... other proceeding for relief under sub section 2 has to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively otherwise it leads to absurdity when the legislature has consciously used the aforesaid two different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTara and ors. Vs. Director, Social Welfare and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-18-1997
Reported in: AIR1999SC1508; (1998)8SCC671
..... such a marriage is irregular fasid and not void batil therefore the bar of unlawful conjunction jama bainal mahramain renders a marriage irregular and not void consequently under the hanafi law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Jagannath Temple Puri Management Committee Represented Through It ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-1997
Reported in: JT1997(8)SC98; 1997(6)SCALE150; (1997)8SCC422
..... 32 demonstrates that the legislature intended the said clauses to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively clause a of section 32 specifies that a document can be presented for registration by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Radhakrishna Murthy and Company and ors. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-20-1997
Reported in: JT1998(4)SC426; (1997)8SCC37; [1999]113STC161(SC)
..... such a marriage is irregular fasid and not void batil therefore the bar of unlawful conjunction jama bainal mahramain renders a marriage irregular and not void consequently under the hanafi law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Sampath Kumar Vs. Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate, Mad ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-16-1997
Reported in: [1998]92CompCas313(SC); 1997LC799(SC); 1997(96)ELT511(SC); JT1997(8)SC135; 1997(6)SCALE140; (1997)8SCC358; [1997]Supp4SCR142; 1997(2)LC749(SC)
..... such a marriage is irregular fasid and not void batil therefore the bar of unlawful conjunction jama bainal mahramain renders a marriage irregular and not void consequently under the hanafi law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of T.N. Vs. Suresh and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-05-1997
Reported in: AIR1998SC1044; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)276; 1998CriLJ1416; 1997(4)Crimes414(SC); JT1997(9)SC647; 1997(7)SCALE402; (1998)2SCC372; [1997]Supp6SCR203
..... both the conditions precedent for exercising the jurisdiction under section 263 of the act are conjunctive and not disjunctive an order of assessment passed by an income tax officer therefore should .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFood Corporation of India, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-28-1997
Reported in: AIR1997SC1252; JT1997(2)SC243; 1997(1)SCALE720; (1997)3SCC410; [1997]1SCR24; [1997]105STC4(SC)
..... r 698 approved an acceptable formula of co relating the notion of real income in conjunction with the method of accounting for the purpose of computation of income for the purpose .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Jamaldeen and Others Etc. Vs. High Court of Madras and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-20-1997
Reported in: AIR1997SC3780; 1997(1)CTC478; JT1997(4)SC413; (1997)2MLJ37(SC); 1997(3)SCALE236; (1997)4SCC30
..... both the conditions precedent for exercising the jurisdiction under section 263 of the act are conjunctive and not disjunctive an order of assessment passed by an income tax officer therefore should .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. United India Insurance Company Limited, Bangalore Vs. Smt. Sharad ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-26-1997
Reported in: 1998ACJ252; AIR1998Kant141; ILR1997KAR3290
..... other proceeding for relief under sub section 2 has to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively otherwise it leads to absurdity when the legislature has consciously used the aforesaid two different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTanviben Pankaj Kumar Divetia Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-1997
Reported in: AIR1997SC2193; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)9; 1997(2)BLJR1374; 1997CriLJ2535; 1997(2)Crimes109(SC); (1997)2GLR1346; JT1997(5)SC233; 1997(4)SCALE33; (1997)7SCC156; [1997]Supp1SCR96; 1997
..... and occipital regions in addition to the said injuries a sub conjunctive haemorrhage was found on the left eye of the appellant ..... skull which was bone deep the doctor apprehended that the sub conjunctive haemorrhage might have occurred on account of fracture of skull ..... of the injury suffered by the appellant on the contrary sub conjunctive haemorrhage led the doctor to think that the patient might .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial