Confusable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: confusable Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 513 results (0.01 seconds)Peshawar Soap and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. M/S. Godrej Soaps Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2000
Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)452; 90(2001)DLT289; 2001(58)DRJ170
..... close and careful examination of the products in juxtaposition was likely to be induced or confused into buying the wrong product the commercial reality is that newcomers most often arrange incentives ..... soap 11 the addition of the defendant s house mark godrej eliminates any possibility of confusion 12 because of the plaintiff s misrepresentations it has disentitled itself of discretionary relief 13 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWal-mart Stores, Inc. Vs. Samara Brothers, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-22-2000
..... have universally imposed that requirement since without distinctiveness the trade dress would not cause confusion as to origin as 43 a requires in evaluating distinctiveness courts have differentiated between ..... have universally imposed that requirement since without distinctiveness the trade dress would not cause confusion as to the origin sponsorship or approval of the goods as the section requires .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabha Kakkar (Smt.) Vs. Joint Director of Education and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-13-2000
Reported in: (2000)2UPLBEC1378
..... teachers in the state could not exercise their option due to confusion and therefore a fresh opportunity was being given to them ..... of the teachers learned counsel has submitted that in case of confusion and ambiguity the correct position can be determined by taking ..... in absence of the clarification contained therein the teachers were under confusion and they could not exercise options by this order a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2000
Reported in: (2001)165CTR(Del)177
..... of factual controversies and department s role in creating a confused situation is writ large the stands of contesting claimants have ..... is remitted back to the commission in view of the confused conclusions arrived at by the commission and the inconsistent stand ..... of factual controversies and department s role in creating a confused situation is writ large the stands of contesting claimants have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStenberg Vs. Carhart
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-2000
..... d x there is no other abortion procedure which could be confused with that description ama factsheet 3 a commonsense understanding of ..... killing it there is no other abortion procedure which could be confused with that description ama factsheet 3 internal quotation marks omitted ..... term intact d e would compound rather than remedy any confusion regarding the statute s meaning as is evident from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuber Khaini Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prabhoolal Ramratan Das Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-13-2000
Reported in: 2002(24)PTC135(Cal)
..... persons in a casual manner and there excepts a strong livelihood of confusion and deception in the course of trade according to him the ..... been used after the photograph according to him this is enough to confuse the buyer of the khaini and further according to him the ..... he further submitted that to deceive is one thing and to cause confusion is neither according to him there is no question of any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLa Opala R.G. Ltd. Vs. International Distilleries (i) Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-2000
Reported in: 2002(25)PTC206(Cal)
..... notwithstanding the objection of the plaintiff and the defendant contended that there would be no confusion by the use of the trade mark solitaire which has been used in conjunction with ..... and alcoholic beverages are completely two different products and there is no scope for any confusion or deception for the customers it has also been pointed out that the trademark solitaire .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Ravichandran and Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ2021
..... 3 8 1999 which documents had no relevance whatsoever and as such had resulted in confusing the detenus so as to affect their rights of making effective representation 4 the learned ..... 1999 by d 1 triplicane police station the learned counsel therefore argues that a great confusion is caused as to what has happened after the police custody and as to whether .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Bajaj Preeti Tulsidas Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ2625
..... to the detenue and because of that supply the detenue was confused and her right to make a proper representation against the detention ..... counsel is that such a supply of irrelevant document would have confused the detenue and thereby affected her right to make an effective ..... authority and therefore a mere supply cannot have the effect of confusing the detenue or in any way affecting her right to make .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSantosh Kumar Vs. Nageshwar Prasad and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-15-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)AWC3094
..... was recorded on above important documentary evidence smt sonpati being illiterate and village lady was confused in telling the names of her three daughters and their respective husbands not relying on ..... order was stayed smt sonpati admitted the second written statement but appellate court relied on confused statement of smt sonpati when two different written statements were filed it was incumbent to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial