Confrontation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: confrontation Page 1 of about 300 results (0.093 seconds)Myladimmal Surendran and ors.Vs. State of KeralA.
Court: Supreme Court of India
1 these appeals have been filed against the common judgment passed by the high court of kerala at ernakulam in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Sharanappa Malappa Sakhare
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1977)79BOMLR132
joshi j 1 his lordship after setting out the facts of the case proceeded at the outset we are constrained...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. Green
Court: US Supreme Court
..... case more broadly than the court has seen fit to do and to confront squarely the confrontation clause because the holding of the california supreme court is the result of ..... factfinder when a probability exists that incriminating pretrial testimony is unreliable its admission absent confrontation will prejudicially distort the factfinding process the reliability of pretrial testimony in turn is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCoy Vs. Iowa
Court: US Supreme Court
..... appellant contends that this procedure authorized by state statute violated his sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against him i in august 1985 appellant was arrested and charged with ..... many rules allowing the admission of out of court statements demonstrate legislative exceptions to the confrontation clause of general applicability are commonplace footnote 2 6 i would not impose a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaryland Vs. Craig
Court: US Supreme Court
..... evidence are available longstanding principles of the law of hearsay applicable as well to confrontation clause analysis favor the better evidence ibid see also roberts supra requiring unavailability as ..... relevant sense if unconfronted testimony is admissible hearsay when the witness is unable to confront the defendant then presumably there are other categories of admissible hearsay consisting of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDutton Vs. Evans
Court: US Supreme Court
..... the court of appeals reversed holding that the georgia statute violated appellee s right to confrontation secured by the sixth and fourteenth amendments appellee contends that the georgia hearsay exception is ..... confession implicating a codefendant violated the codefendant s right of cross examination secured by the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment roberts v russell 392 u s 293 1968 giving .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Inadi
Court: US Supreme Court
..... offered against the party respondent also objected to the admission of the statements on confrontation clause grounds contending that they were inadmissible absent a showing that the declarants ..... made no effort to secure his presence the court then overruled respondent s renewed confrontation clause objections holding that lazaro s statements were admissible because they satisfied the coconspirator .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLilly Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
..... deciding whether the admission of a declarant s out of court statements violates the confrontation clause courts should independently review whether the government s proffered guarantees of trustworthiness satisfy ..... in judgment such an approach not only departs from an original understanding of the confrontation clause but also freezes our jurisprudence by making trial court decisions excluding such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCrawford Vs. Washington
Court: US Supreme Court
..... framework is so unpredictable that it fails to provide meaningful protection from even core confrontation violations reliability is an amorphous if not entirely subjective concept there are countless ..... the state s argument that guarantees of trustworthiness were unnecessary since petitioner waived his confrontation rights by invoking the marital privilege it reasoned that forcing the defendant to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMelendez-diaz Vs. Massachusetts
Court: US Supreme Court
..... state law or the compulsory process clause is no substitute for the right of confrontation unlike the confrontation clause those provisions are of no use to the defendant when the witness is ..... expansive new interpretation b no historical evidence supports the court s conclusion that the confrontation clause was understood to extend beyond conventional witnesses to include analysts who conduct scientific .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial