Skip to content


Confrontation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: confrontation Page 1 of about 300 results (0.093 seconds)
Sep 01 2010 (SC)

Myladimmal Surendran and ors.Vs. State of KeralA.

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 these appeals have been filed against the common judgment passed by the high court of kerala at ernakulam in...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1975 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sharanappa Malappa Sakhare

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1977)79BOMLR132

joshi j 1 his lordship after setting out the facts of the case proceeded at the outset we are constrained...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1970 (FN)

California Vs. Green

Court: US Supreme Court

..... case more broadly than the court has seen fit to do and to confront squarely the confrontation clause because the holding of the california supreme court is the result of ..... factfinder when a probability exists that incriminating pretrial testimony is unreliable its admission absent confrontation will prejudicially distort the factfinding process the reliability of pretrial testimony in turn is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 1988 (FN)

Coy Vs. Iowa

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appellant contends that this procedure authorized by state statute violated his sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against him i in august 1985 appellant was arrested and charged with ..... many rules allowing the admission of out of court statements demonstrate legislative exceptions to the confrontation clause of general applicability are commonplace footnote 2 6 i would not impose a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 1990 (FN)

Maryland Vs. Craig

Court: US Supreme Court

..... evidence are available longstanding principles of the law of hearsay applicable as well to confrontation clause analysis favor the better evidence ibid see also roberts supra requiring unavailability as ..... relevant sense if unconfronted testimony is admissible hearsay when the witness is unable to confront the defendant then presumably there are other categories of admissible hearsay consisting of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 15 1970 (FN)

Dutton Vs. Evans

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court of appeals reversed holding that the georgia statute violated appellee s right to confrontation secured by the sixth and fourteenth amendments appellee contends that the georgia hearsay exception is ..... confession implicating a codefendant violated the codefendant s right of cross examination secured by the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment roberts v russell 392 u s 293 1968 giving .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 1986 (FN)

United States Vs. Inadi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... offered against the party respondent also objected to the admission of the statements on confrontation clause grounds contending that they were inadmissible absent a showing that the declarants ..... made no effort to secure his presence the court then overruled respondent s renewed confrontation clause objections holding that lazaro s statements were admissible because they satisfied the coconspirator .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1999 (FN)

Lilly Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deciding whether the admission of a declarant s out of court statements violates the confrontation clause courts should independently review whether the government s proffered guarantees of trustworthiness satisfy ..... in judgment such an approach not only departs from an original understanding of the confrontation clause but also freezes our jurisprudence by making trial court decisions excluding such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2004 (FN)

Crawford Vs. Washington

Court: US Supreme Court

..... framework is so unpredictable that it fails to provide meaningful protection from even core confrontation violations reliability is an amorphous if not entirely subjective concept there are countless ..... the state s argument that guarantees of trustworthiness were unnecessary since petitioner waived his confrontation rights by invoking the marital privilege it reasoned that forcing the defendant to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2009 (FN)

Melendez-diaz Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state law or the compulsory process clause is no substitute for the right of confrontation unlike the confrontation clause those provisions are of no use to the defendant when the witness is ..... expansive new interpretation b no historical evidence supports the court s conclusion that the confrontation clause was understood to extend beyond conventional witnesses to include analysts who conduct scientific .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //