Conductivity - Year 1985 - Judgments

Jan 15 1985 (FN)

New Jersey Vs. T.L.O.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-15-1985

..... a system of graduated response by distinguishing between violent unlawful or seriously disruptive conduct and conduct that will only warrant serious sanctions when the student engages in repetitive offenses ..... and committing other crimes but also that students conform themselves to the standards of conduct prescribed by school authorities we have repeatedly emphasized the need for affirming the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 1985 (FN)

Aspen Skiing Vs. Aspen Highlands Skiing

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-19-1985

..... the essential facilities doctrine and that an anticompetitive intent does not transform nonexclusionary conduct into monopolization in response highlands submits that given the evidence in the record ..... relevance of the essential facilities doctrine or the somewhat hypothetical question whether nonexclusionary conduct could ever constitute an abuse of monopoly power if motivated by an anticompetitive .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1985 (FN)

United States Vs. Young

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-20-1985

..... the prosecution deliberately withheld exculpatory evidence and proceeded to charge the prosecution with reprehensible conduct in purportedly attempting to cast a false light on respondent s activities defense ..... with ever increasing frequency yet this court simply is not institutionally capable of conducting the sort of detailed record analyses required in properly administering the plain error .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 1985 (FN)

Sedima, S.P.R.L. Vs. Imrex Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-01-1985

..... appropriately undertaken by the courts v sedima may maintain this action if the defendants conducted the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity the questions whether the defendants committed ..... in any such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity or to conduct or participate in the conduct of that enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity section 1961 defines .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 1985 (FN)

Mitchell Vs. Forsyth

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-19-1985

..... discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable ..... discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1985 (FN)

Southern Rate Conf. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-27-1985

..... the petitioners collective ratemaking activity is immune from sherman act liability this anticompetitive conduct is taken pursuant to a clearly articulated state policy the legislatures of north ..... rate requests the rate bureaus must follow stringent procedural safeguards which channel their conduct into useful informational tasks and thereby diminish the threat of anticompetitive misconduct footnote .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1985 (FN)

In Re Snyder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-16-1985

..... standards that shows an unfitness to discharge continuing obligations to clients or the courts or conduct inimical to the administration of justice more specific guidance is provided by case law ..... code of professional responsibility rule 8 4 d american bar association model rules of professional conduct 1983 disciplinary rule 1 102 a 5 american bar association model code of professional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1985 (FN)

Hallie Vs. Eau Claire

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-27-1985

..... as discussed above the statutes clearly contemplate that a city may engage in anticompetitive conduct such conduct is a foreseeable result of empowering the city to refuse to serve unannexed ..... policy to replace competition with regulation the court concluded that respondent s allegedly anticompetitive conduct fell within the state action exemption to the federal antitrust laws established by parker .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 1985 (FN)

United States Vs. Sharpe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-20-1985

..... that terry stops be brief for that rule would avoid the court s measuring police conduct according to a virtually standardless yardstick finally dissolving the brevity requirement into the general ..... more drug enforcement experience than thrasher there is no reason why thrasher could not have conducted the simple sniffing investigation that cooke later did thrasher like all south carolina highway .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 1985 (FN)

Burger King Corp. Vs. Rudzewicz

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-20-1985

..... circuit syllabus appellant is a florida corporation whose principal offices are in miami it conducts most of its restaurant business through a franchise operation under which franchisees are licensed ..... primarily in florida the contract documents themselves emphasize that burger king s operations are conducted and supervised from the miami headquarters that all relevant notices and payments must be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Conductivity - Judgment Search Results