Conditioner - Judgment Search Results
Air Conditioner Company of India Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2004
Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT503TriDel
Matched in: Parties Air Conditioner Company of India Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Classic Air Conditioners Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. Pawan Kumar JaIn and Anothe ...
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2001
S.P. Saberwal, Member: 1. By this order we shall dispose of application dated 5.1.2001, filed by the appellant/applicant. It is stated in the application that the above mentioned appeal was filed by the appellant against respondent...
Tcl Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd Vs. the Judges of the Federal C ...
Court: Australia High Court
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
related proceedings below 61. Under the agreement, TCL granted Castel the exclusive right to sell in Australia air conditioners manufactured by TCL. In July 2008 Castel submitted to arbitration in Australia a dispute arising from contractual claims
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Chemtec Water Conditioners P.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-1999
Reported in: (2000)(115)ELT135TriDel
Engg., 1996 (88) E.L.T. 622 (S.C.) held that assembly, installation and erection of machinery, cleared in knocked down condition, at site in different sections, attached to earth by foundation, thus becoming immovable do not specify the test
M/S. Air Conditioner Co. of India Vs. Cce Meerut
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-26-2000
1. The issue involved in this appeal, filed by M/s Air Conditioner Co.of India, is whether the Modvat Credit was available to them under Rule 57 H of the Central
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free