Concomitant - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: concomitant Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 67 results (0.737 seconds)Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. V. Satyam Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-08-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)ARBLR453(AP)
p venkatarama j 1 c r p no 2460 1993 filed by the government of andhra pradesh arises out of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Tuli Veneer and Plywood Industries
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-02-1995
v d gyani j 1 the following question of law has been referred to this court for its opinion whether...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZulfkar Khan Vs. Vice Chancellor, Gulbarga University
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-19-1995
Reported in: ILR1996KAR239; 1995(6)KarLJ365
orderg c bharuka j 1 there are five petitioners in these writ petitions they are all students of bachelor of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Ramar Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director, Union Bank of India a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: (1995)2MLJ91
..... 11 it is settled position of law that transfer is a necessary concomitant of every service and the courts in exercise of the powers ..... has held as follows it is axiomatic that transfer is a necessary concomitance of every service and such an order of transfer need not ..... for the very simple reason as stated earlier it is a necessary concomitance of every service this is what the various high courts in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-1995
Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT33TriDel
..... in the case of soda manufactured with the appellants trade mark since there is no concomitant sale of concentrates for the purpose the royalty paid thereon is not so includible the ..... the case of soda manufactured with the appellant s trade mark since there is no concomitant sale of concentrates for the purpose the royalty paid thereon is not so includible however .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnanda Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kerala Minerals and Metals Ltd. ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-05-1995
Reported in: AIR1995Ker302
..... freedom to contract in other words a fair play in the joints is a necessary concomitant for an administrative body functioning in an administrative sphere or quasi administrative sphere however the ..... and in awarding a contract similarly free play in the joints is also a necessary concomitant for an administrative body functioning in an administrative sphere or quasi administrative sphere if all .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrasad and Co. Vs. the Superintending Engineer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT537; 1996(1)ARBLR692(AP)
..... to depart from what they had agreed of course it something follows as a necessary concomitant to what was agreed upon the court can assume that too as a part of ..... of completion the provision as to escalation of rates does not follow as a necessary concomitant to what was agreed upon to borrow the expression of the supreme court nor can .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTilakraj Bhaktavarmal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-27-1995
Reported in: ILR1995KAR1932; [1995]216ITR621(KAR); [1995]216ITR621(Karn)
..... and the arguments in writing a personal hearing it was held was not always a concomitant of the principles of natural justice 22 in c b gautam v union of india ..... penalty iv the grant of an oral hearing to the assessee is not a necessary concomitant of the principles of audi alteram partem and so long as the assessee concerned is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProgoty Supply and Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. the State of Assam an ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Sep-18-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Gau72
..... freedom of contract in other words a free play in the joints is a necessary concomitant for an administrtive body functioning in an administrative sphere or quasi administrative sphere however ..... consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non arbitrariness a necessary concomitant of the rule of law every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPratap Mardokar Vs. Goa Shipyard and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-05-1995
Reported in: (1997)IIILLJ561Bom
..... held that the provision of the canteen is deemed by the statute as a necessary concomitant of the manufacturing activity it was specifically held by the apex court that even where .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial