Con - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: con Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 349 results (0.648 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
guaranteed under articles 14 and 19 1 g of the constitution of india in the interest of justice and equity b
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
provided that such persons shall enjoy all rights and entitlements conferred on transgender persons under the act 23 form 1 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
main accused in the prevention of corruption act is acquitted conviction against the abettor does not survive 10 the learned counsel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court: Karnataka
in not noticing that a party is bound by the contract entered into and cannot resile therefrom and misunderstood and misconstrued
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
17 sold sites by encroaching upon haddigidida halla which is considered to be a government land 20 the main contention of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court: Karnataka
and held that the appeal is not maintainable 8 per contra the learned counsel for the appellant with regard to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Gaurav K Bhandari Vs. Mr. Bharath Chandrashekhar
Court: Karnataka
there are certain interlocutory proceedings which are required to be considered by the courts prior to the commencement of arbitration and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court: Karnataka
the statute and no word in any section can be construed in isolation every provision and every word must be looked
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court: Karnataka
have to be consumed and cannot be stored but the concept of banking enables the generating company to inject energy into
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...
Court: Karnataka
impounded and not in accordance and inadmissible under law and confirm the impounding order dated 28 2 2015 passed by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial