Computer System - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: computer system Page 1 of about 11 results (0.027 seconds)Computility Computers Systems Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2003)(158)ELT462Tri(Mum.)bai
These invoices only represent value for custom purposes of a computer system sent by Bank of America, Hongkong to their branch and in examining the CPU it was observed "IBM 5360 System - 36 S/No. 4412986" and on 31.03.1986 when the goods
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlus Computer System Ltd. Vs. Kalra Rai and Associates and Another
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Ltd., the producer and it has been averred therein that computer was lying with M/s. Sigma Aids after replacement of Hard the present appeal has been attempted by M/s. Plus Computer System Ltd., Azadpur, Delhi, the original supplier to whom the price
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd. Vs. Singaravelu Murugan
Court: Singapore Supreme Court
the plaintiff the defendant's commissions earned, as director of MN Computer, on the HDB and CPF contracts which amounted to S$153,985.64. November 2007, the defendant formed a new company, MN Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd ("MN Computer"). The defendant was a 50%
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd Vs. Singaravelu Murugan
Court: Singapore Supreme Court
of the Respondent. The Respondent was an officer of Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd, the Appellant in this appeal The the Respondent had obtained from his newly-incorporated company, MN Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd ("MN"), a company whose line of business
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTComputility Computer Systems Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1997)60ITD256(Mum.)
he specifically disallowed investment allowance to the assessee-company on the computer machines held by it. Thus, he withdrew investment allowance of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Central Vs. Impressive Computer Systems Pvt.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT104Tri(Mum.)bai
function of digital imaging and producing appliances which adapts any computer with SCSI interface. Composite machines are to be classified according that, the imported goods are described as Polaroid Digital Imaging System PRO Palette 8000, HR 6000 (film recorder) Sprintscan 35 scanners,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHcl Infosystems Ltd vs.ferranti Computer System India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
company registered in India and a related entity of Ferranti Computer Systems, which is headquartered in Antwerp, Belgium. The defendant represented registered in India and a related entity of Ferranti Computer Systems, which is headquartered in Antwerp, Belgium. The defendant represented to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Patni Computers Systems Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Reported in: (2008)301ITR60(Pune.)
assessee company is engaged in the business of development of computer software. In the relevant previous year, the assessee company had
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Patni Computer Systems Limited
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
assessee company is engaged in the business of development of computer software. In the relevant previous year, the assessee company had
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMicro Gate a Sole Proprietorship Concern Having Its Office. Vs. Arcain ...
Court: Karnataka
1. The instant petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act. seeking winding...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>