Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: chhattisgarh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc raipur Page 1 of about 136 results (1.692 seconds)Accountant General State of Chhattisgarh, Through: S.S. Sarojkar Vs. L ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
..... observed thus 10 we may also note that duties and powers of the comptroller and auditor general s have already been prescribed under the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 we do not think it is necessary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Shanti Devi Vs. Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of Ind ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
whether he remained absent during past 5 years from his duties on some health grounds was also replied in negative and and personal bad habits and thus had violated terms and conditions of the insurance contract and the declaration made in the been mentioned that consuming ganja was stopped and his physical activities were restricted the medical history which has been given in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.G. State Power Distribution Company Limited Vs. Fattechand Bagdi
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
to conclude something contrary to the findings recorded by the auditor of the electricity supply company 24 this question has also company approached karnataka high court the actual supply of the power was commenced in the month of november 1992 and then if there is a case of availing services or hiring services on consideration and if there is some deficiency in service 1992 and then the company filed a complaint under the act for claiming damages thus it is clear that the cause
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPradeep Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Sairam Automobiles and Services Pvt. Ltd ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
last it has also been stated that terms and conditions applied offer valid till 30th april 2010 or till stocks supply of any goods or for the provision of any service adopts any unfair method or unfair or deceptive practice including unfair trade practice has been defined under consumer protection act 1986 under section 2 1 r it is a long
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Chandra Rai Vs. Branch Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
2009 cpj 320 kanwal singh vs branch manager iffco tokio general insurance co ltd appeal no 268 2008 decided on 11 to drive commercial vehicle evidently there was a breach of condition of the contract of insurance and therefore the insurer could licence this repudiation of claim was alleged as deficiency in service on the part of the insurance company and so consumer category of transport vehicle under section 2 47 of the act therefore the decision of the district forum to the effect
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheikh Sultan and Others Vs. Mrs. Preeti Dawada and Others
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
been agreed to be sold to the complainants on the conditions mentioned therein it has also been stated that possession of so it has been averred that as no deficiency in service has been committed by the builder so the complaint is was demanded and from this notice a fresh cause of action has arisen in favour of the complainants there may be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatish Garg and Another Vs. Netafim Irrigation India Pvt. Ltd. and Oth ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
laboratory for examination at that time it was in bend condition and the portions were also adherent to each other and are not necessary party so far as alleged deficiency in services are concerned it was found that the pipe supplied to in the category of consumer as defined in consumer protection act 1986 it has also been observed that state bank of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Niraj Singh
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
on top of this document in the print of line generated by the computer there is mention of date 07 10 to the branch manager national insurance company ltd branch bhilai power house on the subject of issuance of claim form in was much delayed he has also drawn our attention towards condition no 1 of the insurance policy under which the insured least on non standard basis and it committed deficiency in service in not settling the claim on that basis also and mentioned in this clause that in case of the criminal act which may be subject of claim under this policy the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaksuda Begum Vs. Executive Engineer : West Zone, City Division âande ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
hon ble supreme court in the case of u p power corporation ltd and ors vs anis ahmed iii 2013 cpj date of purchase of the house by the appellant complainant service connection no 033581 was operative for domestic use in the present case before the district forum under the consumer protection act 1986 is not maintainable 6 accordingly without going into merits
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Ajay Ti ...
Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
of the electricity act 2003 the consumer forum cannot derive power to adjudicate a dispute in relation to assessment made under not oelig consumer and the appellant electricity board is not service provider 9 looking to the facts of the instant case does it amount to hazardous service by the licensee such act of oelig unauthorized use of electricity has nothing to do
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT