Complex - Year 1996 - Judgments

Dec 04 1996 (HC)

The Faridabad Complex Administration Vs. the Commissioner, Ambala Divi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-04-1996

Reported in: (1997)115PLR527

..... second respondent filed on appeal before the commissioner against the orders of the administrator faridabad complex administration faridabad dated march 16 1979 calling upon the second respondent to pay octroi duty ..... fixing the date of hearing as 8 8 1980 was issued either to the faridabad complex administration i e the petitioner or its legal advisor therefore the commissioner erred in deciding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 1996 (HC)

K.K. Complex (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-15-1996

Reported in: 1996(3)WLC306; 1996(1)WLN575

..... the auction it could use the land for the purpose of commercial complex and or hotel the company invested about 15 to 20 crore ..... of rupees the company has started constructing the commercial complex the company posed itself to be the owner of the land ..... to 20 crore of rupees the company has started constructing the commercial complex the company posed itself to be the owner of the land .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 1996 (HC)

Gajanan Motal Complex Vs. Gwalior Development Authority

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-07-1996

Reported in: AIR1996MP135

..... to be used for the purposes of foot paths this would provide access to the complex to be raised by the petitioner it is this area which is covered 6y the ..... question would be utilised as a foot path general public would have access to the complex to be constructed by the petitioner there is abundant judicial precedence for the preposition that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1996 (HC)

Ammal Pillai and ors. Vs. Varadarajulu Complex a Partnership Firm Repr ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-13-1996

Reported in: (1997)1MLJ626

..... the petition it was originally stated that the landlords wanted to put up a building complex after demolishing the entire structure it is also alleged that the state bank of india ..... entire building will have to be demolished and they would to put up a building complex this according to the learned counsel is not a requirement under section 14 1 h .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1996 (SC)

Faridabad Complex Administration Vs. Yadu Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-11-1996

Reported in: AIR1997SC1985; [1990]184ITR34(SC); JT1996(11)SC623; (1997)116PLR183; 1997(1)SCALE173; (1997)3SCC491; [1996]Supp9SCR978

..... is not disputed that the appellant is the successor in interest by operation of faridabad complex administration regulation development act 1972 act 4 of 1972 and succeeded to the property held .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1996 (HC)