Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 10 Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 12,284 results (0.212 seconds)

P. Sankara Narayanan, Proprietor, Shri Bhuvaneswari Films Vs. State of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2007Mad317; (2007)9VST401(Mad)

..... has been filed on behalf of the state, wherein it is indicated that intention of the (3rd amendment) act is to encourage of new films within the state and to enable low budget tamil films to withstand the competition from films produced in other languages and dubbed in tamil. it has been further stated that since ..... provisions contained in the (3rd amendment) act are discriminatory or violative of article 19. on the other hand, it is submitted that the object is to encourage and protect the producers, who produce their films in tamil, as they have to face stiff competition in the shape of dubbed tamil films.8. in : (2007)6scc624 (aashirwad films v. ..... justify the present provisions. the objects and reasons of the (2nd amendment) act, are extracted hereunder:statement of objects and reasons - with a view to encourage the production of new films in this state and to enable low budget tamil films to withstand the competition from films production on other languages and dubbed in tamil, it is .....

All India Association of Inspectors and Asst. Superintendent Posts, Re ...

Court : Chennai

..... was dismissed with costs. submissions:- 8. the learned counsel for the petitioners contended that it was the consistent practice of the department of posts to conduct competitive examination year wise. in fact, the department earlier published a calendar indicating separate dates for examination year wise. however, examination was not conducted as scheduled. according ..... s. group b . 3. the promotion to the post of postal services group b is governed by the department of posts, postal services group b recruitment (amendment) rules 1993. the rules provide that 75% of the total vacancies should be filled by seniority from among the eligible employees holding the post of inspector of ..... second petitioner and other similarly situated employees were denied of an opportunity to appear in the separate examinations to be held year wise on account of the act of clubbing vacancies and the proposal to conduct a single examination for filling up the 19% quota for the five year period 2012-13, 2013-14 .....

M. Ramani and Others Vs. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Chennai

..... trained apprentice is entitled for preference. 24. an argument was advanced stating that the apprentice act as amended vide amendment act, 2014 has crystallized the rights of the petitioners in a more definite manner. the amended section 22(1) of the act states that every employer shall formulate its own policy for recruiting any apprentice who has completed ..... the respondent issued the impugned proceedings dated 10.12.2015, and directed that selection of all category shall be made on merit viz., 85% for the competitive written examination and 15% viva-voce and as per communal roaster and if other things being equal, preference should be given to the apprentices, who have ..... referred to and considered in public service commission uttaranchal vs. jagdish chandra singh bora and anr., etc., in civil appeal nos.3034 and 3036 of 2007 and the hon'ble supreme court, while interpreting the condition other things be equal, a trained apprentice should be given preference over direct recruits held that .....

M. Saravanan Vs. The Registrar, CAT, Chennai Bench, Chennai and Others

Court : Chennai

..... dismissed o.a.no.1416 of 2010. against the order passed by the first respondent, the present writ petition has been filed. the second respondent has conducted departmental competitive examination wherein the third respondent has been selected on merits. before conducting the said examination, proper publication has been issued. the diploma obtained by the third respondent ..... st- 2) have been notified. in the notification it is stated as follows: a. the candidates must possess the educational qualification laid down in sro 13e as amended by sro 191 of 28-11-1994 and sro 66 dated 27-05-2003 (annexure-b) b. for the post of chargeman (t/mech) a candidate must possess ..... fifth respondent by its communication, dated 18-11-2010 has informed that it has not approved any part-time course. by way of further information provided under the rti act on 21-11-2013, it has informed that only from the year 2012-13, dme part time course offered by the central polytechnic college, taramani has been approved .....

G. Chinnadurai Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department

Court : Chennai

..... a residential house, which has to be interpreted as one residential house and not more than one and this position was so even prior to the amendment of section 54f(1) of the act. the learned counsel sought to factually distinguish the decisions in the case of smt.v.r.karpagam, and dr.smt.p.k.vasanthi rangarajan. further, ..... , dated 04.01.2012. the learned counsel referred to the circular of the cbdt, in circular no.1 of 2015, dated 21.01.2015, to submit that the amendments to section 54f(1), will take effect from 1st, april, 2014 and will accordingly, apply in relation to assessment year 2015-16 and subsequent assessment years and would not ..... order passed by the respondent dated 30.08.2015, containing the reasons for reopening the assessment for the year 2011-12, under section 148 of the income tax act, 1961, (act). 2. for the purpose of adjudication of the present challenge the following facts are relevant. the petitioner filed his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 .....

Minor Govind Ashok Vs. The Government of India Rep. by its Secretary M ...

Court : Chennai

..... cannot be said to be excessive, arbitrary or discriminatory. the government has stipulated the said conditions only for the reserved seats and not for all the other open competition seats, wherein no discrimination is made. the central government having arrived at a policy decision for the benefit of the localities of puducherry in the educational system, ..... on by the learned counsel for the parties. 8. g.o.ms.no.04, chief secretariat (higher and technical education), puducherry dated 09.02.2016, has amended clause 2.5 of the centac information bulletin 2015-16, issued vide g.o.ms.no.27 dated 01.04.2015 of the chief secretariat (education) puducherry and ..... have also passed the higher secondary examination from the same school.the government order further prescribes that the amended clause will come into effect from the ensuing academic year 2016-2017.9. section 13 (m) of the jipmer act enables jipmer to reserve at least twenty seats out of every seventy five seats in undergraduate courses in .....

Simran Wind Project Private Limited and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electric ...

Court : Chennai

..... promote training in electricity for making the markets competitive. under the tariff policy, there is a mandate given to the regulatory commissions, namely, to monitor the trading transactions 36 continuously and ensure that the ..... with effect from 6.1.2006. one of the primary objectives of the tariff policy is to ensure availability of electricity to consumers at reasonable and competitive rates. the tariff policy tries to balance the interests of consumers and the need for investments while prescribing the rate of return. it also tries to ..... apppc from exceeding the preferential tariff. the same has further been clarified in the counter. the said amendment has been brought into force, to safeguard the consumers interest as envisaged under section 61 (d) of the act and also at the same time, to balance the procurement cost of purchase price of electricity component. therefore .....

T. Thanggakolanchinathan Vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Madr ...

Court : Chennai

..... for direct recruitment to 23 posts of district judges (entry level) in the tamil nadu state judicial services under the amended provisions of the tamil nadu state judicial services (cadre and recruitment) rules, 2007 (in short tamil nadu judicial service rules ). 3. the petitioner would claim that he possesses b.a. and ..... departments/ public sector undertakings/ government companies declaring that the non-observance of the scheme of reservation for persons with disabilities should be considered as an act of non-obedience and the nodal officer in department/ public sector undertakings/ government companies, responsible for the proper strict implementation of reservation for person with ..... by the petitioner miserably lack merits and accordingly prayed for dismissal. 20. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drawing our attention to the disabilities act, the impugned notification and also the judgment rendered by the hon'ble division bench of this court reported in 2010 (5) ctc 1 (k. .....

M. Saravanan Vs. The Registrar, CAT, Chennai Bench, Chennai and Others

Court : Chennai

..... o.a.no.1416 of 2010. against the order passed by the first respondent, the present writ petition has been filed. the second respondent has conducted departmental competitive examination wherein the third respondent has been selected on merits. before conducting the said examination, proper publication has been issued. the diploma obtained by the third respondent ..... 2010, the first respondent has published a notification wherein it is stated as follows: a. the candidates must possess the educational qualification laid down in sro 13e as amended by sro 191 of 28-11-1994 and sro 66 dated 27-05-2003 (annexure-b) b. for the post of chargeman (t/mech) a candidate must ..... fifth respondent by its communication, dated 18-11-2010 has informed that it has not approved any part-time course. by way of further information provided under the rti act on 21-11-2013, it has informed that only from the year 2012-13, dme part time course offered by the central polytechnic college, taramani has been approved .....

B. Raghumaran (Rep. by his Power Agent, R. Bharathidasan) Vs. Pushpaba ...

Court : Chennai

..... no.13 has observed as under: "13. we have heard learned counsel for the parties. it is not disputed that article 58 of the limitation act would apply to the amended plaint inasmuch as it sought to add the relief of declaration of title to the already existing relief for grant of permanent injunction. in khatri hotels private ..... of attorney deed dated 15.12.2006 (ex.b1), which was executed in favour of the second defendant thangaraj by a registered cancellation deed dated 09.03.2007. the act of cancellation was also communicated to the second defendant by post on the very same day. as discussed above, the cancellation of power of attorney deed dated ..... as against the appellant/plaintiff. it is also answered that the defendants had no knowledge about ex.a5(cancellation deed) general power of cancellation deed dated 09.03.2007. 135. since the plaintiff is bound to substantiate his contention that the second defendant had not handed over the entire sale consideration to his principal, no necessity .....