Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... article 309 of the constitution of india and promulgated by the governor of rajasthan are known as `the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012' and were intended to come into force with immediate effect and replaced schedule iii under rule 6 completely and the section b of the ..... 2011 (2) wlc raj. 46, in which earlier division bench of this court was concerned with the ras examinations of 2007, held that under the provisions of the rajasthan state & subordinate services ( direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) rules 1999 (for short, the rules of 1999), in which the application of scaling method to the sbcwp no ..... of the marks of the candidates in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in the case of sanjay singh vs. u.p.public service commission (2007) 3 scc720and directed the rpsc sbcwp no.1211/2014 bhanwar lal vs. state & ors. a/w 6 connected matters judgment dt:26/11/2014 3/83 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... . the position is clear, as laid down by this court in sant ram sharma v. state of rajasthan & anr. (supra) it is true that the government cannot amend or supersede statutory rules by administrative instructions, but if the rules are silent on any particular point government can fill up the gaps and supplement the rules and issue instructions ..... of apex court in case of union of india & anr. vs. s.k. goel [(2007) 14 scc 641]. in the said decision, the apex court has held that dpc enjoys full discretion to device its own method by objective assessment of competitive merit of individual officers and scope of judicial review in such matters of promotion is very much ..... describing the circular as a blatant attempt by the government to brow beat the dpc, mr. singhvi has argued that by adhering to the circular the appellants have acted dehors rule 24a of the rules of 1963 and as such the impugned order passed by the learned single judge cannot be faulted and calls for no interference in this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 and that the ras examination 2012 will be the last examination in which the candidates were given the option to choose 2 out of 24 ..... for evaluation of the marks of the candidates, in view of the decision of hon'ble supreme court in sanjay singh v/s up public service commission ((2007) 3 7 ssc720 and directed the commission to declare the results afresh on the basis of raw or actual marks obtained by the candidates and not on ..... by the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the marks .....
Tag this Judgment!