Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 5 Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 11 of about 189 results (0.167 seconds)

Dec 18 2015 (HC)

Om Prakash Yadav Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... joining. by an order dated 6.8.2013 issued by the state government, the petitioner was ordered to be placed under suspension. the same order was subsequently amended by an order dated 12.2.2014 whereby the petitioner has been considered and deemed to be suspended with effect from 3 27.6.2013. aggrieved against the ..... as per instructions of the government of rajasthan. from the averments made in reply to the writ petition it also appears that the respondents simply acted upon the circular dated 11.10.2007 and placed the petitioner under suspension. it also appears that the order impugned was passed with retrospective effect by treating the petitioner under suspension from ..... reliance can be placed upon a judgment of this court in the case of ashutosh darshora vs. state of rajasthan &ors, s.b. civil writ petition no.473/2007 decided on 29.4.2008 wherein it was held that:- in every case, where the government servant is facing trial for criminal charges, including the charges relating to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2014 (HC)

Secretary (Admn.) Jvvnl Jodhpur and ors Vs. Ashok Kumar and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature. . (rajasthan amendment w.e.f.1.7.1960).the definition has been subjected to further 9 amendment in the year 2014 by the rajasthan state legislature, but we are concerned with the definition existing at the time ..... , operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this act in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, ..... being failed to receive adequate financial as well as medical aid, the appellant preferred an application raising claim for compensation as per provisions of the workmen compensation act, 1930. the application was accepted on 9.10.2009 awarding compensation in a tune of rs.5,40,528/-. the respondent petitioner after availing necessary treatment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2014 (HC)

Abdul Hamid and ors Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , jodhpur. learned sessions judge, jodhpur transferred the case to the court of learned special judge, sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act cases, jodhpur in the month of july, 2010. on 11.7.2011 learned trial court framed amended charges and the same were read over and explained to the accused persons. on denial of the same trial commenced as desired ..... given by hon'ble the apex court in the case of bhim singh v. union of india & ors. in writ petition no.310/2005, decided on 20.9.2007. learned trial court after hearing learned special public prosecutor and learned amicus curiae convicted all the seven accused persons for the offences punishable under section 121, 121-a, 122 ..... a division bench judgment of hon'ble bombay high court in the case of javed alias java ahmed mohammed akbar bhatt and ors. v. state of maharashtra, reported in 2007 cri.l.j.1386, considering the scope of term waging war . while dealing with sections 121 and 121-a of the indian penal code. in the case aforesaid the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Ram Karan and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... /s patel raghave natha & ors. (air1969sc1297, mansa ram v/s s.p.pathak & ors. (air1983sc1239 and state of 37 punjab v/s bhatinda district cooperative milk producers union ltd. ((2007) 11 scc363.40. in a recent case in joint collector ranga reddy district and anr. v/s d.narsing rao and ors. ((2015) 3 scc695, it was held that where ..... if so, what is the effect?.31. under section 191 of the marwar land revenue act, no grant was transferable by jagirdar. the same was the position in jaipur tenancy act, 1945 and the jaipur state grants land tenures act, 31 1947, which was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to tenancies in state grants, the rights and obligations of tenants therein ..... state of rajasthan & anr. v/s board of revenue & ors.5. d.b.civil writ contempt petition no.323/2007 mahant damodar dass chaila v/s jagdish prasad garg, rts prabhudas & anr.6. d.b.civil special appeal no.1048/2007 shri shanti nath ji sthan deh v/s the state of raj. & ors.7. d.b.civil special appeal no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Thandi and Anr Vs. Board of Revenue, Ajmer and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... /s patel raghave natha & ors. (air1969sc1297, mansa ram v/s s.p.pathak & ors. (air1983sc1239 and state of 37 punjab v/s bhatinda district cooperative milk producers union ltd. ((2007) 11 scc363.40. in a recent case in joint collector ranga reddy district and anr. v/s d.narsing rao and ors. ((2015) 3 scc695, it was held that where ..... if so, what is the effect?.31. under section 191 of the marwar land revenue act, no grant was transferable by jagirdar. the same was the position in jaipur tenancy act, 1945 and the jaipur state grants land tenures act, 31 1947, which was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to tenancies in state grants, the rights and obligations of tenants therein ..... state of rajasthan & anr. v/s board of revenue & ors.5. d.b.civil writ contempt petition no.323/2007 mahant damodar dass chaila v/s jagdish prasad garg, rts prabhudas & anr.6. d.b.civil special appeal no.1048/2007 shri shanti nath ji sthan deh v/s the state of raj. & ors.7. d.b.civil special appeal no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2015 (HC)

Devi Singh Dewal and Ors Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... abhiyan/district primary education programme/ rajiv gandhi pathshala/ shikshakarmi board and madrasa listed under the madarasa board. . the eligibility given under the schedule-'a . too stands amended according and that shall be as follows:- 1. senior secondary (10+2) from recognized board or its equivalent.2. minimum one year experience of working is essential ..... persons appointed directly. in the case of mitendra singh (supra), a proviso was added to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayati raj rules, 1996, wherein an amendment had been made under notification dated 29.1.2013, where the persons who have acquired experience of working for more than one year as junior technical assistant ..... , even though they are on the same footing as persons directly employed by the state governments under the various projects. resultantly , the state government has acted in a manner 15 which is prejudicial and without any nexus or relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question.18. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2015 (HC)

Mahendra Kumar Shrotriya and Anr Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... abhiyan/district primary education programme/ rajiv gandhi pathshala/ shikshakarmi board and madrasa listed under the madarasa board. . the eligibility given under the schedule-'a . too stands amended according and that shall be as follows:- 1. senior secondary (10+2) from recognized board or its equivalent.2. minimum one year experience of working is essential ..... persons appointed directly. in the case of mitendra singh (supra), a proviso was added to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayati raj rules, 1996, wherein an amendment had been made under notification dated 29.1.2013, where the persons who have acquired experience of working for more than one year as junior technical assistant ..... , even though they are on the same footing as persons directly employed by the state governments under the various projects. resultantly , the state government has acted in a manner 15 which is prejudicial and without any nexus or relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question.18. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2015 (HC)

Smt. Rajani Trivedi Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... abhiyan/district primary education programme/ rajiv gandhi pathshala/ shikshakarmi board and madrasa listed under the madarasa board. . the eligibility given under the schedule-'a . too stands amended according and that shall be as follows:- 1. senior secondary (10+2) from recognized board or its equivalent.2. minimum one year experience of working is essential ..... persons appointed directly. in the case of mitendra singh (supra), a proviso was added to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayati raj rules, 1996, wherein an amendment had been made under notification dated 29.1.2013, where the persons who have acquired experience of working for more than one year as junior technical assistant ..... , even though they are on the same footing as persons directly employed by the state governments under the various projects. resultantly , the state government has acted in a manner 15 which is prejudicial and without any nexus or relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question.18. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2015 (HC)

Kokila Yadav and Ors Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... abhiyan/district primary education programme/ rajiv gandhi pathshala/ shikshakarmi board and madrasa listed under the madarasa board. . the eligibility given under the schedule-'a . too stands amended according and that shall be as follows:- 1. senior secondary (10+2) from recognized board or its equivalent.2. minimum one year experience of working is essential ..... persons appointed directly. in the case of mitendra singh (supra), a proviso was added to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayati raj rules, 1996, wherein an amendment had been made under notification dated 29.1.2013, where the persons who have acquired experience of working for more than one year as junior technical assistant ..... , even though they are on the same footing as persons directly employed by the state governments under the various projects. resultantly , the state government has acted in a manner 15 which is prejudicial and without any nexus or relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question.18. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2015 (HC)

Rajni Purohit and Ors Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... abhiyan/district primary education programme/ rajiv gandhi pathshala/ shikshakarmi board and madrasa listed under the madarasa board. . the eligibility given under the schedule-'a . too stands amended according and that shall be as follows:- 1. senior secondary (10+2) from recognized board or its equivalent.2. minimum one year experience of working is essential ..... persons appointed directly. in the case of mitendra singh (supra), a proviso was added to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayati raj rules, 1996, wherein an amendment had been made under notification dated 29.1.2013, where the persons who have acquired experience of working for more than one year as junior technical assistant ..... , even though they are on the same footing as persons directly employed by the state governments under the various projects. resultantly , the state government has acted in a manner 15 which is prejudicial and without any nexus or relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question.18. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //