Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... oral sex. thus, the said allegation is covered under the definition of penetrative sexual assault given in section 3(d) of the aforesaid act as well as under section 375 (a) ipc of the amended act of 2013. the argument that the prosecutrix was not under the control or custody of the petitioner or that the said incident did not ..... the trial court to proceed with the trial on day to day basis till its conclusion in view of section 309 of the cr.p.c.amended by the parliament vide the criminal law (amendment) bail, 2012 i.e.bill no.63 of 2013 that in a case of rape, every trial must be concluded within a period of two ..... public at large belongs to the petitioner. charge-sheet has been filed under section 5(f)/6, 5(g)/6, 7/8 of the protection of children from sexual offence act. section 5(f) reads as under:- [9]. 5. aggravated penetrative sexual assault.- (a) .............(b) .............(c) .............(d) .............(e) .............(f) whoever being on the management or staff of an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... such, there is apparently no substance in the plea raised by the defendant pnm about suit being barred under the provisions of the benami act, the plea is, therefore, rejected. (ii) amendment of plaint in the present case after completion of pleadings of the parties by way of filing of written statement, counter claim, replication ..... averments that certain explanatory facts could not be pleaded in the plaint by mistake, which were detected while discussing with the counsel and, therefore, application seeking amendment was being filed. by way of said application, the plaintiffs wanted to introduce para 3(a), which single paragraph ran into as many as 10 pages ..... the electricity connection and the equipment would be removed at their expenses. at the outset it was contended by learned counsel for the appellants that the amendment application filed by the appellants-plaintiffs was wrongly rejected by the trial court, which has caused immense prejudice to the appellants. it was submitted that on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... denied that the finding recorded by the courts in the earlier litigation, which resulted in the judgment and decree dated 24.11.1997 operates as res judicata. based on the amended suit and written statement, post remand, the trial court framed only one issue as to whether the plaintiff was entitled to possession of the suit property?. on behalf of the ..... dated 19.11.2004 was challenged by way of filing s.b. civil regular first appeal no.590/2005 by the plaintiff and this court by judgment dated 13.12.2007 came to the conclusion that as the impugned judgment dated 19.11.2004 was mainly based only on the ground that the order of the trial court dated 24.11 ..... .250/- per month, which was rs.350/- now; on refusal to receive rent, the same was being deposited under section 19a of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950; the execution of the rent note dated 28.03.1969 and the compromise dated 04.11.1997 were disputed and it was claimed that both the documents were forged .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... vi, rule 17 cpc seeking to add ground of reasonable and bona fide requirement of the suit premises, which application was allowed by the trial court. the amended plaint was responded by the defendant by way of filing written statement denying the facts relating to creation of the trust by maji leel kanwar and purchase of ..... between the plaintiff and defendant, though default was committed, but in terms of section 13(6) of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950 ('the act').the defendant was entitled to benefit to firs.default; issue of reasonable and bona fide requirement was maintained against the plaintiff and the decree was modified to ..... 1 & 2)?. . during pendency of the present appeal, an application under order xli, rule 27 cpc was filed by the respondent khem singh on 13.03.2007 seeking permission to produce additional evidence and has annexed notice dated 13.05.1981 given on behalf of maji leel kanwar to defendant guru bux singh indicating transfer in favour .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... application for stay, was there any prayer with regard to non-payment of excise duty by oswal agro. even if the impugned clause (vi) in the amended licence, which made it obligatory for oswal agro to export its entire quantity of edible rice bran oil, had been quashed even then for the purposes of ..... of the hon ble apex court. 1. dalip singh versus state of uttar pradesh & ors.[(2010) 2 scc114 2. prestige lights limited versus state bank of india [(2007) 8 scc449 3. rakesh kumar goel & ors.versus uttar pradesh state industrial development corporation limited & ors.[(2010) 8 scc263 4. agricultural and processed food products versus oswal ..... stay order and dismissal of the writ petition. in this application, respondents have seriously disputed the status of the petitioner as society registered under the societies registration act. along with the application, a letter dated 24th of june 2013 is also annexed, which was addressed to senior divisional commercial manager, divisional office, ajmer by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... been awarded only 2 out of 5 points in physical fitness and stamina although record indicates that the petitioner was selected as best shot and participated in shooting competition as part of kashmir frontier team.21. it is also noteworthy that the petitioner had been posted in jammu & kashmir in the year 1991-92 and ..... would be conducive to fairness and transparency in public administration, and would result in fairness to public servants. the state must be a model employer, and must act fairly towards its employees. only then would good governance be possible. in our opinion, non-communication of entries in the annual confidential report of a public servant, ..... 11.2009 for restoration of his seniority, which was rejected on 06.08.2010 (annexure-12). the petitioner thereafter amended the instant petition, to impugn the orders passed during pendency of the writ petition. the amendment was allowed vide order of this court dated 07.05.2011.4. learned counsel for the petitioner has contended .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... crime. . we fully endorse the above view once again.34. it is relevant to point out that section 364-a had been introduced in the ipc by virtue of amendment act 42 of 1993. the statement of objects and reasons is as follows:- 1. kidnappings by terrorists for ransom, for creating panic amongst the people and for securing release ..... to amendment that the indian parliament wanted to tackle the menace of kidnapping and abduction with a stern hand. section 364a ipc provides ..... do or abstain db cra no.565/2005 & 574/2005 5/23 from doing any act or to pay a ransom, shall be punishable with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. . 12.section 364a ipc was amended vide amendment act no.42 of 1993. it is manifest from the statement of objects and reasons leading .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... crime. . we fully endorse the above view once again.34. it is relevant to point out that section 364-a had been introduced in the ipc by virtue of amendment act 42 of 1993. the statement of objects and reasons is as follows:- 1. kidnappings by terrorists for ransom, for creating panic amongst the people and for securing release ..... to amendment that the indian parliament wanted to tackle the menace of kidnapping and abduction with a stern hand. section 364a ipc provides ..... do or abstain db cra no.565/2005 & 574/2005 5/23 from doing any act or to pay a ransom, shall be punishable with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. . 12.section 364a ipc was amended vide amendment act no.42 of 1993. it is manifest from the statement of objects and reasons leading .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... competent authority., that in compliance of the order dated 27.02.2012 the state government under section 15 of the mmdr act issued notification dated 19.06.2012 and made necessary amendment in the rules of 1986 while incorporating all the recommendations of the moef of march 2010 and also model guidelines of ..... enforced inter-alia, under the provisions of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974, the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the environment (protection) act, 1986 and the public liability insurance act, 1991 along with their amendments and rules made there under and also any other orders passed by the hon'ble ..... and ultra vires the notification issued by the central government under the environment (protection) act, 1986, and the environment (protection) rules, 1986. 2 the petitioner has also prayed for declaring all the actions taken in pursuance to the amended rules vide notification dated 19.6.2012 as well as advertisements dated 26.10.2012 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... /s patel raghave natha & ors. (air1969sc1297, mansa ram v/s s.p.pathak & ors. (air1983sc1239 and state of 37 punjab v/s bhatinda district cooperative milk producers union ltd. ((2007) 11 scc363.40. in a recent case in joint collector ranga reddy district and anr. v/s d.narsing rao and ors. ((2015) 3 scc695, it was held that where ..... if so, what is the effect?.31. under section 191 of the marwar land revenue act, no grant was transferable by jagirdar. the same was the position in jaipur tenancy act, 1945 and the jaipur state grants land tenures act, 31 1947, which was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to tenancies in state grants, the rights and obligations of tenants therein ..... state of rajasthan & anr. v/s board of revenue & ors.5. d.b.civil writ contempt petition no.323/2007 mahant damodar dass chaila v/s jagdish prasad garg, rts prabhudas & anr.6. d.b.civil special appeal no.1048/2007 shri shanti nath ji sthan deh v/s the state of raj. & ors.7. d.b.civil special appeal no .....
Tag this Judgment!