Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... of royalty even on the coal supplied to the workmen for domestic consumption, till 12.9.1972, when there was an 5 amendment in section-9 of the mmdr act, bringing sub-section 2a therein, by act 56 of 1972, making exemption from payment of royalty in respect of any coal consumed by workmen engaged in any colliery, provided ..... trust & another vs. vithal rao & ors., reported in (1973) 1 scc500 and in state of uttar pradesh & ors. vs. deepak fertilizers & petrochemical corporation ltd., reported in (2007) 10 scc342 learned senior counsel has also placed reliance upon the decision of the apex court in state of west-bengal vs. anwar ali sarkar, reported in air1952sc75 wherein it ..... to pay the royalty on the rom coal only, in spite of insertion of rules 64-b and 64-c in the mineral concession rules. in or about the year 2007 and onwards, the impugned demand notices were raised by the district mining officer, ramgarh / hazaribag / dhanbad, demanding royalty on the tonnage of washed coal. 6 8. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the case of radiance fincap private limited (supra) at paragraph 4 of the report after referring to the precedent on the ambit and scope of amending act have held that amendment act which affects substantive rights can be presumed to be -10- prospective in operation unless made retrospective either expressly or by unnecessary. the opinion of the ..... on the ground that it was neither acquired for the swarnrekha multipurpose project nor required by the state government. they relied upon the letter dated 13th september 2007 obtained under right to information as per which a proposal for release of land was mooted. during pendency of the said writ petition an i.a. ..... project. petitioner no.2 is the vendee of petitioner no.1 to whom the aforesaid lands were sold through registered sale deed dated -2- 18th june, 2007. these two petitioners have joined in the present proceedings seeking declaration that the entire land acquisition proceeding in connection with the aforesaid pieces of land has lapsed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... is that of first renewal. petitioner' original lease expired on 28th february, 2008 and it had made an application for renewal on 23rd february, 2007. it is also evident that the amendment act, 2015 has come into effect from 12th january, 2015 . the order of rejection of renewal application has not been made prior to 12th january, ..... required conditions of the lease as for instance, the postulated clearance/approvals /consent in terms of sub-section (5) or (6) of section 8a of the amendment act, 2015. as is also apparent from the pleadings in the present case and undisputed by the parties, the lessee has not obtained the statutory clearances like environmental ..... relating to the jurisdiction of the state government now to pass an order of rejection of his renewal application after 7. coming into force of the mmdr (amendment) act, 2015 with effect from 12.01.2015. the intricate questions of law involved cannot be properly adjudicated by the revisional authority. it is also pointed out .....
Tag this Judgment!