Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 25 amendment of section 32 Page 1 of about 85,408 results (0.498 seconds)

Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. Lucknow Vs. Uttar Prades ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the above position and had proposed progressive improvement based on randm work to be carried;(f) the old plants have low fixed charges and per unit charges is competitive compared with new plants and this is great advantage; 17. mr. ramachandran contended that in the circumstances the operating parameters such as plf, auxiliary consumption and ..... decision made by the commission in the first part of para 8 of the order dated october 10, 2007 giving the relief to the appellant. 6. learned counsel contended that by notification dated march 19, 2008, the commission has amended its uperc (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations, 2004 and has gb provided as under with ..... station recognized by the government of india in the notification dated march 26, 1994 issued in exercise of the powers under section 43a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (since repealed) is 25 years;(b)the old stations should normally be abandoned after the above life period and new plant established in its place;(c) .....

Date of Decision : 5.8.2013 Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... section 245d(1) and the settlement commission cannot reopen its concluded proceedings under section 154 of the act so as to levy interest under section 234b. it was noticed that amendment made by the finance act, 2007 with effect from 1.6.2007 was for this purpose. relevant portion of the judgment reads as under:- interest on default in ..... been made to the provisions of section 245d(2a) and section 245d(2d) and section 245ha of the income tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the act .) as substituted by an amendment by the finance act, 2007 with effect from 1.6.2007 being ultra vires.2. the premises of the petitioner were searched under section 132 of the ..... act on 17.1.1995. thereafter, he filed an application on 29.1.1997 before the settlement commission-respondent no.2 under .....

Rajasthan State Electricity Board Jaipur Vs. The Dy. Commissioner of I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , the assessee in the return remained in loss and the 100% depreciation was claimed by the assessee in the return due to a bonafide mistake. by taxation laws (amendment) act, 1991, the depreciation in the case of company was restricted to 75% which due to oversight was missed by the assessee while filing the return. the commissioner of ..... the judgment of the learned single judge filed a special appeal which has been allowed by the division bench of the high court vide its judgment dated 13.11.2007 upholding the demand of additional tax. the assessee aggrieved by the judgment of the division bench has come up in this appeal.5. we have heard shri arijit ..... commissioner of income tax(assessment) & anr. ...respondent(s) judgment ashok bhushan, j.this appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the division bench judgment dated 13.11.2007 of the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jaipur bench, jaipur by which d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.837 of 1993 filed by the revenue has .....

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

..... made to the cvc. the learned senior counsel appearing for wipl had also referred to section 19(1)(a) of the competition act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the competition amendment act, 2007. the provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry on receipt of a complaint . this was amended by the competition amendment act, 2007 to provide for an inquiry on receipt of information . the explanation provided for the legislative ..... amendment was to the effect that the term information is wider. the notes to clauses of the competition amendment act, 2007 expressly state that the amendment enables the competition commission .....

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... concerned to abide by such other orders as the commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; (f) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (g) pass such other [order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. [provided that while passing orders under this section, if the commission ..... of such agreement or ten percent of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order by the commission; ..... and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. the competition amendment act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of braham dutt (supra). the adjudicatory function of the cci remained unchanged, but several amendments with respect to its procedure were a mismatch to its adjudicatory functions and were more .....

The State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC699; (1957)59BOMLR945; (1957)35MysLJ(SC)283; [1957]1SCR874

..... 20, 1952, the state of bombay passed the bombay lotteries and prize competitions control and tax (amendment) act (bom. xxx of 1952). this act amended the provisions of the 1948 act in several particulars. thus, the words 'but does not include a prize competition contained in a newspaper printed and published outside the province of bombay', which ..... and gambling under entry 34 as hereinbefore mentioned. by the amending act xxx of 1952 the legislature by deleting the concluding words of the definition of 'prize competition', namely, 'but does not include etc., etc.,' extended the operation of the act to prize competitions carried on in newspapers printed and published outside the state ..... deletion was that the scope and the application of the 1948 act so amended became enlarged and extended so as to cover prize competitions contained in newspapers printed and published outside the state of bombay. after clause (d) of s. 2(1) the amending act inserted a new clause (dd) which defined the word ' .....

A. Aruna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD548; 2003(2)ALT770

..... while assailing the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions. in the result, we hold that the andhra pradesh motor vehicles taxation (amendment) act, 1995 (amendment act 23 of 1995) and andhra pradesh motor vehicle taxation (amendment) act, 1992 (amendment act 11 of 1992) are constitutionally valid. consequently, we dismiss all the writ petitions with no order as to costs.55. ..... (a) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (4).' the third schedule (see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act) as amended by amendment act 23 of 1995 reads as follows :third schedule[see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3]sl. no.period/class of vehiclemotor cycles including- ..... writ petitions, mandamus was sought to declare section 4(1-a)(a) read with schedule 3 part i of the tamil nadu motor vehicles taxation act, 1974 as amended by amendment act no. 27 of 1998, as unconstitutional, violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and inconsistent with scheme of .....

R.A. Coodzer and Company Vs. the Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1948)2MLJ442

..... escape taxation. presumably with the object of obviating such uncertainty in the determination of the nature of such payments, section 10(4)(b) was introduced by the amendment act of 1939.7. the language of that provision is clear, and according to well established canons of construction it is not open to read into the enactment words ..... already pointed out, there is no provision corresponding to section 10(4)(b) of the indian act in any of the english taxing statutes.5. section 10(4)(b) became part of the income-tax act only by the amendment act of 1939. before the introduction of this provision, courts in india were called upon to decide whether ..... permissible deductions. the learned judges did not accept the contention but in doing so, fazl ali, c.j., observed, after dealing with the earlier cases before the amendment and the introduction of this provision, as follows:these decisions, in my opinion, lay down the general principle in correct terms though they are now more or less .....

Ritu Sengupta and Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT68; 2008(106)DRJ54

..... tax by three, the quotient being added to the amount of property tax which was payable immediately before the coming into force of the delhi municipal corporation (amendment) act, 2003, and to the amount of property tax which shall be payable respectively in each of the remaining two successive years after such addition.(2) where ..... of any new building for which an occupancy certificate has been granted, or which has been occupied, after the coming into force of the delhi municipal corporation (amendment) act, 2003, such payment shall be made, and such return shall be furnished, within thirty days of the expiry of the quarter in which such occupancy certificate ..... 01,552/-. the said refundable amount has been adjusted towards property tax payable for future years. the adjustment is recorded in the order dated 8th february, 2007. learned counsel for the petitioners had stated before the court that adjustment of excess payment paid earlier had been made and the only question that required .....

V.V. Trans-investments (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (1992)42ITD242(Hyd.)

..... after the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 1960, had to be provided for out of the profits of the financial year or of the previous financial years before declaration of dividend.accordingly, it would follow ..... to section 205(1) makes it clear that the company has to provide for depreciation for any previous financial year or years which falls after the commencement of companies (amendment) act, 1960, before declaring or paying dividend for any financial year. under clause (a) of the first proviso to section 205(1), depreciation for all financial years ..... reads as under :-- if a company has incurred any loss in any financial year or years, which falls or fall after the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 1960, then the amount of loss or an amount which is equal to the amount provided for depreciation for that year or those years whichever is .....