Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 25 amendment of section 32 Court: himachal pradesh Page 3 of about 380 results (0.094 seconds)

Dec 11 1992 (HC)

NaraIn Chand Prashar Vs. Prem Kumar Dhumal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1993HP84

..... be followed, for recounting the votes, as is required to be followed for counting the votes. on recount, result sheet in form 20 is required to be amended and amendments so made are again required to be announced by the returning officer. sub-rule (6) of rule 63 provides that after the total number of votes polled by ..... reading of that provision along with section 83, include a copy of the affidavit...............'39. the mandatory requirement of sub-section(3) of section 81 of the act is in two parts. the first part provides that every election petition shall be accompanied by as many copies thereof as there are respondents mentioned in the petition ..... , without supplying copy thereof to the respondent, along with the copy of petition, the supreme court held that there was no breach of the provisions of the act in regard to the filing of the election petition, since the election petition itself reproduced the whole of the translation in english, which averments with regard to pamphlet .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2002 (HC)

Gita Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3832

..... an impression on our minds that she is a reliable and truthful witness. her testimony suffers from no infirmity or blemish whatsoever., we have no hesitation in acting upon her testimony alone without looking for any corroboration. however, in this case there is ample corroboration available on the record to lend further credence to the ..... victim in such cases is vital and unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the courts should find no difficulty to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be relaible. seeking ..... in case so desired because joint trial of offences punishable under the i.p.c. and under the aforesaid scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act is not permissible under the law. 7. the learned trial court thereafter proceeded with the trial of the appellant for the offence under section 376, i.p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2005 (HC)

Gurdial Singh Vs. Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporati ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC474,2006ACJ2568

..... claims tribunal may, if it thinks necessary so to do, treat the report as if it were an application for compensation under this act.after its amendment by act 54 of 1994, the said sub-section is as follow:(4) the claims tribunal shall treat any report of accidents forwarded to it under sub-section (6) of ..... report, forward the same to such claims tribunal and insurer.15. claims tribunals are constituted under section 165 of the act. section 166 deals with application for grant of compensation. section 166, sub-section (4) prior to its amendment in 1994 was as follow:(4) where a police officer has filed a copy of the report regarding an accident to ..... tani ram , to contend that the application for compensation must contain the plea of negligence. in view of the amendment in the motor vehicles act, 1988 and the amendment made to it in 1994, this judgment has to be read in the context of motor vehicles act, 1939 alone. the provisions of law have undergone a sea-change. under the motor vehicles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1955 (HC)

Bijai Ram Kanshi Ram and anr. Vs. Jai Ram Ganga Ram and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955HP57

..... the plaint by their two names with the addition of the word 'firm'. upon objection as to registration of the firm being taken, plaintiffs amended the plaint by deleting the word 'firm'. but this amendment was made after limitation had expired. james j. held, in the circumstances, that:'the suit was not barred under section 22 as the deletion ..... to award interest.'(c)--jagat kishore pd. narain singh v. parmesh war singh', air 1951 pat 348 (n), whereina division bench of that high court observedthat:'the act of the decree-holder deprived the plaintiff not only of the money, but the interest which he could earn and that should be taken into account in fixing the ..... ganga ram, on theother hand, argued--and, in my opinion, notwithout justification--that this was not a case of addition of a new plaintiff and, therefore section 22, limitation act has no application here.he drew my attention to the heading of theplaint, which, as already shown, runs as 'firm(1) jai ram (2) ganga ram ....' it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1994 (HC)

State of H.P. Vs. Vinod Kumar

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3134

..... also. we may also add that although a dying declaration recorded by a police officer during the course of the investigation is admissible under section 32 of the indian evidence act in view of the exception provided in sub-section (2) of section 162 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, it is better to leave such dying declarations out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2005 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Vs. Amar Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC674,2006ACJ1831,AIR2006HP49

..... or by any person who has been disqualified for holding or obtaining a driving licence during the period of disqualification; or8. section 2(10) of the motor vehicles act defines driving license as follows :2(10) 'driving licence' means the licence issued by a competent authority under chapter ii authorizing the person specified therein to drive, ..... licence shall, notwithstanding its expiry under this subsection, continue to be effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry.12. section 15 of the motor vehicles act provides for renewal of driving licenses. section 15(1), insofar as it is relevant to the present case, reads as follows :15(1) any licensing authority may ..... disqualified from holding or obtaining a driving licence after obtaining such licence.12.2 it was also submitted by learned counsel for the claimant that the motor vehicles act is a beneficial piece of legislation and must be construed accordingly, i.e. in favour of claimants and insured parties. it would be too much to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2005 (HC)

Akshit Kumar Vs. Balbir Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : III(2006)ACC40,2006ACJ2107

..... at the very outset it may be noted that section 163-a was introduced in motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') by amendment act 54 of 1994 w.e.f. 14.11.1994. the purpose of introducing section 163-a of the act was to simplify the procedure and to make the tortfeasor and the insurance company liable even in ..... case no negligence could be proved. under section 163-a of the act the claimant is not required to ..... than a person who neither proves negligence nor proves the income of the deceased. according to note no. 6 under the second schedule framed under section 163-a of the act, notional income for compensation to those who had no income prior to the accident is to be taken at rs. 15,000 per annum. therefore, minimum compensation under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2005 (HC)

Gopal Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2743

..... section 302 of the indian penal code and under section 27/54/59 of the arms act to which the accused pleaded not guilty. the prosecution examined as many as 23 witnesses in order to substantiate the charges against the accused. in his statement under ..... was presented in the court of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, una, under section 302 of the indian penal code and under sections 27/54/59 of the arms act, who vide order dated 29-11-2001 committed the case to the court of session for trial. the accused was charge-sheeted for having committed the offence under ..... prosecution, which led to the filing of the charge-sheet against the accused for the offences under section 302 of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act, is that the accused, who is stated to be originally a resident of ballachour in district nawanshehar (punjab), happened to have purchased land at village nangal kalan, una. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2005 (HC)

Shobit Construction and anr. Etc. Vs. T.K. International Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2006HP4,2006(1)ARBLR510(HP)

..... for consideration is whether the defendant has lost his right to file written statement as provided under order 8, rule 1, as substituted by the code, of civil procedure (amendment act, 2002).18.order 8, rule 1 may be reproduced for convenience.o. 8, r. 1: written statement .- the defendant shall, within thirty days from the date of ..... 37. taking into account the extrinsic evidence, i.e., the historical circumstances in which the precursor of section 129 was introduced into the 1882 code by a specific amendment made in 1 895. we are of the view that the non obstacle clause used in section 129 is not merely declaratory, but indicative of parliament's intention ..... historical reasons this distinction was maintained right from the time the letters patent was issued, and has not been disturbed by the code of civil procedure, 1908, despite the amendments made in the cpc from 1976 to 2002.36. an argument was raised in iridum india telecom lid. (2005 air scw 138) that merely because section 129 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1974 (HC)

Om Prakash and anr. Vs. the Board of Schools Education for H.P. and or ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... official gazette. it was in fact published on april 13, 1974. the petitioner contends that the amendment was effected by the board under section 27 (1) of the act, and therefore, required publication by virtue of section 27 (2) of the act before it could take effect. it is urged that inasmuch as publication was not effected until april ..... and, therefore, inasmuch as the requirement of the government's approval had not been satisfied at that time the act of the board was invalid, in the first place, i am ..... 13, 1974. the amendment had not taken effect when the board finalished the proceedings in february 1974, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //