Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Sorted by: recent Page 14 of about 99,820 results (1.210 seconds)

Mar 03 2022 (SC)

Gambhirdan K Gadhvi Vs. The State Of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... incumbent concerned making him/her eligible for all service related benefits.11.3.2 regulation 7.4.0 mandates that the universities/state governments shall modify or amend the relevant acts/statutes of the universities concerned within six months of adoption of these regulations. 11.3.3 thus, ugc regulations, 2010, inter alia, prescribes in ..... of vice chancellors in our university system has become a subject of widespread criticism. we need visionary leadership to give proper direction to higher education in today s competitive world. it is possible only when we have persons of the highest competence & integrity, in the position of the vice chancellor. in this connection, the university ..... scc269 held that a writ of quo warranto can be issued when appointment is contrary to the statutory provisions. in b. srinivasa reddy [(2006) 11 scc731(2) : (2007) 1 scc (l&s) 548 (2)]. , this court has reiterated the legal position that the jurisdiction of the high court to issue a writ of quo warranto .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2022 (SC)

Sunil Kumar Rai Vs. The State Of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... lohra be added with lohara in the scheduled tribes order, 1950.9. after the kaka kalelkar commission report, the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1956 was enacted which was brought into force with effect from 25-9-1956 and for bihar, entry 20 was substituted to read as lohara or ..... effect from 1956 lohara as well as lohra were mentioned as scheduled tribes.10. in the year 1976 the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1976 was passed and in the english version of the same viz. entry 22 the position as existing from 1956 was maintained. lohara and lohra ..... bihar public service commission, patna, secretary of bihar staff selection commission, the secretary central secretary board (constable recruitment, patna, the controller of examination bihar combined entrance competitive, examination board, patna, registrar, office of advocate general patna high court, and secretary of bihar state election authority, patna) patna- 15 dated 08/august/2016 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

All India Gaming Federation Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Shri Pavan Nanda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Play Games 24x7 Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Head Digital Works Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Galactus Funware Technology Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnatka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Saroj Kumar Panigrahi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Junglee Games India Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //