Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Sorted by: old Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.169 seconds)

The Rpp Limited Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL56

..... of the schedule of the existing consumers. in the application, it is stated that the appellant is making frequent applications for change in the schedule of consumers. for amendment of the schedule of the existing consumers a detailed procedure is involved. it is pointed out that in case a nce developer is in the area of one discom ..... reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the respondent nor the same is in keeping with the spirit of the act, which requires fillip to be given to open access and wheeling of electricity to generate competition. learned counsel for the respondent also invited our attention to clauses 16.1 and 16.2 of the aperc (terms ..... of the parties to the schedule of the existing consumers cannot be treated as mandatory direction at all. it was also stated that the provisions of the electricity act, 2003 do not provide for any period for disposal of the applications of the nce developers and only ppas provide for addition of parties to the agreements depending upon .....

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Noida Power Company Ltd. and Uttar

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... there is no rationale in saying that because the uppcl is not adhering to the statutory requirements and has not submitted to tariff filing the commission can amend the bulk supply tariff of npcl. the commission has to use appropriate measures to compel the uppcl to adhere to statutory requirements or to force filing of ..... voidable and hence the uppcl is entitled to its dues under the contract. section 60 electricity act 2003, market domination / competition: 66. the commission has referred to section 60 of the electricity act and to the effect of the transaction in question on competition.neither of the two parties have referred to section 60. during arguments npcl has submitted ..... 5 crores. the commission further directed the parties to find an amicable solution. it also directed npcl to arrange for alternative sources of power by 31st january, 2007. the matter was taken to the high court and under the orders of the high court, npcl deposited further sum of rs.5 crores and uppcl continued .....

Ntpc Limited Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL7

..... be achieved.16. in the petition no. 95 of 2005, it was pointed out that guvnl had requested the ntpc to arrange gas supply from various agencies at competitive prices, so as to achieve maximum utilization of kawas and gandhar power stations. it was also claimed in the petition that the ntpc was informed that many of ..... of time.41. in the circumstances, we are of the view that the norms ought to be relaxed suitably for the years 2004-2005; 2005-2006; 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. but beyond this period, the appellant must arrange for adequate supply of gas for running the two stations independently to their full capacity. for securing gas ..... on 18^th april, 1998, the beneficiaries consented to the proposal of the ntpc to link kawas and gandhar with hbj pipeline.9. after the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 came into force the central commission on 26^th march, 2001 notified the central electricity regulatory commission (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations, 2001. the target .....

Ntpc Ltd. Vs. West Bengal State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL65

..... interest on loan--normative or actual whichever is higher, (iii) o&m expenses (iv) cost of spares in working capital 05^th march, 2004/ 22 of 1999 subsequently amended by order dated 18^th may, 2004 (i) implications of decision on norms in appeal nos. 53, 54, 55 and 56 of 2006 (ii) computation of interest on ..... section 111 of the act of 2003. even, under section 121, which confers on the tribunal supervisory jurisdiction over the commission, we cannot examine the validity of the regulations framed by ..... has no power to deal with challenge to the regulations. we have no hesitation in holding that the regulations framed under sections 61 and 178 of the electricity act, 2003, are in the nature of subordinate legislation and we have no jurisdiction to examine the validity of the regulations in exercise of our appellate jurisdiction under .....

Gmr Industries Ltd. Vs. Andhra Pradesh Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL101

..... to the condition that any further modification of the agreement shall be done only with the prior approval of andhra pradesh electricity regulatory commission. however, the amendments to the agreement as per the respective orders of aperc from time to time shall be carried out. all the conditions mentioned in the agreement are with ..... plants as an exclusive category of generators while determining their generation tariff for supply of electricity to distribution licensee in terms of the various provisions of the act particularly section 86(1)(e), section 61(h) and section 62(3), in our considered opinion, differentiating the co-generation plant of the appellant from ..... electricity from aptransco to epdc in the specified distribution area with effect from 9^th june, 2005.4. the appellant is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 and is engaged in production of sugar, ferro alloys and other allied products. the appellant company has set up 16 mw capacity, non-conventional energy .....

Polyplex Corporation Limited Vs. Uttaranchal Power Corporation

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL115

..... with advisory functions under sub-section (2) of section 86 of the act. the state commission can be called upon by the state government to advise on the following matters: (i) promotion of competition, efficiency and economy in activities of the electricity industry; (iii) reorganisation ..... state transmission and wheeling of electricity. (ii) sub-clause (d) vests power in the commission to issue licences to persons seeking to act as transmission licensees, distribution licensees and electricity traders with respect to their operations within the state. (iii) sub-clause (e) mandates the ..... and restructuring of electricity industry in the state; (iv) matters concerning generation, transmission, distribution and trading of electricity or any other matter referred to the state commission by that government; 22. thus, from the aforesaid analysis, it is clear that neither under section 61 of the act .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL164

..... be recovered through levy of additional energy charge of rs. 0.97 per kwh for a period of six months during october 1, 2006 to march 31, 2007. while computing arr the said amount of rs. 350.01 crores has been taken into account which as per impugned order would result in an energy tariff ..... justify the increased employee cost on account of employing additional skilled staff after merc has notified several regulations in the exercise of its powers under section 181 of the electricity act, 2003. in particular merc has notified merc (consumer grievance redressal forum and ombudsman) regulations, 2003; merc (supply code and other conditions of service) regulations, 2005 ..... as per the proviso to section 61 of the electricity act, 2003 till the merc (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations, 2005 (which were notified on august 24, 2005 and were made effective from fy 2007 as per merc order dated april 13, 2006) comes into force. merc (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations, 2004 which .....

The South Indian Sugars Mills Vs. Karnataka Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL126

..... the appropriate commission. (2) such procurement by distribution licensees for future requirements shall be done, as far as possible, through competitive bidding process under section 63 of the act within suppliers offering energy from same type of non-conventional sources. in the long-term, these technologies would need to compete with ..... , 2005 issued by the commission apply.21. mr. ramachandran also brought to our attention that hon'ble supreme court in ca no. 12 of 2007, against the judgment of this tribunal's dated 7^th september, 2006 titled chhattisgarh biomass energy developers association and ors. v. chhattisgarh state electricity regulatory ..... policy for all future requirement of renewable based power. to facilitate this the kerc should issue guidelines within six months for procurement of electricity through a competitive bidding process from non-conventional energy sources separately for different types i.e., biomass, cogeneration, wind, mini-hydro etc. we order that with effect .....

Poddar Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL86

..... continued for the year 2004-05.6. on 31^st may, 2004 the upcl filed petition no. 2 of 2004 under section 62(4) of the electricity act, 2003 for amendment of the then prevailing tariff fixed by the order dated 8^th september, 2003 insofar as it related to piiu consumers (only steel units) on the plea that ..... domestic, agriculture, commercial and small industry consumers. aicc filed ia no. 52 of 2007 wherein it pleaded that the total demand of domestic consumers should have been met from the lowest cost power available to upcl. this plea being opposed to the judgment ..... both the appeals together.3. all india consumer counsel (aicc in short) uttaranchal, dehradun filed an application for impleadment as a party in appeal no. 12 of 2007 which was allowed by us. aicc is an ngo working from dehradun and has filed the present application for impleadment in the interest of non piiu category of consumers like .....

North Delhi Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL193

..... order, for installation of capacitor banks, it can immediately disallow all expenses towards reactive energy charges. the commission will now have to make the necessary amends in this regard.55. interest apart from reducing interest for the financial year 2004-05, by way of second truing up, the commission has also ..... plea from the respondents can not be considered within the scope of the appeal.26. the commission filed a counter-affidavit dated 1^st february, 2007.on the question of computation of under achievement and over-achievement as well as on the issue of adjustment of prior period expenses in relation ..... and consider the issues involved on the basis of the facts of that appeal.2. the delhi electricity regulatory commission was established pursuant to delhi electricity reforms act, 2000 (dera) for the purpose of restructuring of electricity industry including rationalization of generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity. the government of national capital .....