Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 18 omission of section 23 24 and 25 Court: chennai Page 2 of about 12,239 results (0.300 seconds)

Ashok Leyland Ltd., Madras Vs. Second Addl. Labour Court, Madras and a ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ128Mad; (1992)IMLJ263

..... . here the controversy does not center round a bare interpretation of the settlement. larger questions are involved. one is as to the application of the amended provisions of the act to the situation spoken to in the settlement. the other is with regard to the question as to whether the disbursement under the settlement already done ..... judge was of the opinion that when the right to receive bonus and the rate as well already settled, the enquiry into the impact of the amendments introduced into the act will only partake the character of computation of the benefits and in this view, the learned single judge found no lack of jurisdiction on the part ..... the admitted position is disbursement of bonus for the year 1984 as per the above settlement did take place. subsequently the payment of bonus act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the act, was amended by the payment of bonus (second amendment) ordinance, 8 of 1985, and the parties are at loggerheads only with reference to the application of the .....

V.M. Rao Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1997]228ITR789(Mad)

..... april, 1975, and as a consequence of the amendment, s. 7a is introduced therein which provides as follows : '7a. compulsory deposit to ..... under its authority to impose any tax the compulsory deposit scheme is created under the act. 4. the larger contention aside, however, we have found in the instant case that the compulsory deposit scheme (income-tax payers) act, 1974, has been amended by the finance act (44 of 1980), and its operation is made retroactive w.e.f. 1st ..... therein were/are not governed by the banking regulation act, 1949. in the absence of the amendment aforementioned there could be a deposit in a bank to which the banking regulation act applies as well as to a bank to which the banking regulation act did not apply. the amendment has removed the anomaly and has made all deposits .....

V. M. Rao Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)147CTR(Mad)192

..... april, 1975, and as a consequence of the amendment, s. 7a is introduced therein which provides as follows :'7a. compulsory deposit to be ..... under its authority to impose any tax the compulsory deposit scheme is created under the act.4. the larger contention aside, however, we have found in the instant case that the compulsory deposit scheme (income-tax payers) act, 1974, has been amended by the finance act (44 of 1980), and its operation is made retroactive w.e.f. 1st ..... therein were/are not governed by the banking regulation act, 1949. in the absence of the amendment aforementioned there could be a deposit in a bank to which the banking regulation act applies as well as to a bank to which the banking regulation act did not apply. the amendment has removed the anomaly and has made all deposits .....

Union of India, Rep by the Defence Estate Office, Chennai and Others V ...

Court : Chennai

..... the acquisition proceedings preferred writ petitions, seeking to quash the said proceedings on the ground that the time prescribed under the land acquisition (tamil nadu amendment) act, 1996 (tamil nadu act 16 of 1997) has not been adhered to, resulting in vitiation of the proceedings. 5. during the pendency of the acquisition proceedings initiated on ..... substantial bearing, would not have retrospective effect. however, in the case on hand, when the publication in the locality was not made before the enforcement of the amending act, the period of sixty days would commence from the date of the notification, i.e., 16th july, 1997. indisputably, the 60th day will come to an ..... end on 15th september 1997, from the date of notification of the enforcement of the amending act. the publication in the locality was given only on 16th october, 1997. 31. in state of haryana vs. raghubir dayal (supra), the question under consideration was .....

S.R.M. Ar. S. Sp. Sathappan Chettiar Vs. S.R.M.R.M. Ramanathan Chettia ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1955Mad682; (1955)2MLJ408

..... to treat that valuation as an implied valuation in the plaint for computation of court-fees under section 7(iv)(b), court-fees act, we do not think we should in the exercise of our discretion, allow an amendment, and at this stage, merely to enable the plaintiff to reduce the liability to pay the court-fee which he would otherwise be ..... or is deemed to have valued the relief for the purpose of court-fee payable under section 7(iv)(b), court-fees act, he has no right at all to change that valuation at any stage even by an amendment of the plaint. that was not the question before the full bench. we do not propose to decide that question. we would ..... the plaint to furnish the plaintiif's valuation of the relief falling within the scope of section 7(iv)(b), court-fees act. the plaintiff wants to amend the plaint to revise the jurisdictional value and put it at rs. 50,000 instead of rs. 15 lakhs, specified in the plaint. that, ol course, could he consistent only .....

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ram Kumar Giri

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2006)103TTJ(Chennai)352

..... but subsequently under section 263, the cit has revised the same. the assessee filed an appeal against the revision. the tribunal held that in view of the amendment by finance act, 2002 the non-compete amount cannot be taxed.17. learned departmental representative, in his rebuttal, submitted that the said receipt was in the nature of revenue. ..... revenue was not able to prove that the agreement was sham or colourable one. the assessee submits that the business or commercial transactions are to be considered in the competitive world with reference to the capacity of the persons, the competitors' capacity to poach the person connected with the other party, marketing and distribution capacity, knowledge of ..... the receipt of rs. 57.84 crores between 1999 and 2002 was in the nature of capital receipt by way of compensation for agreeing not to carry any competitive business or disclosing to any third party any know-how gained by him. additionally, interest of rs. 1,15,06,849 on a deposit of rs. 30 .....

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Industr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1971)2MLJ502

..... , unless the order goes so far beyond the needs of the occasion as to be turned into an act of tyranny. nothing of the kind is charged. the fourteenth. amendment does not protect a business against the hazards of competition. public service commission of montana v. great northern utilities co.1. it is from hazards of that ..... is state of andhra pradesh v. raja reddy : [1967]3scr28 . in that case, the vires of the andhra pradesh land revenue additional assessment and cess revision (amendment) act of 1962 was questioned. the main object of the enactment was to 'rationalise the land revenue assessment' in respect of lands in the areas of the telengana and ..... in twyford tea co. v. kerala state : [1970]3scr383 . in this case, the kerala plantation (additional tax act of 1960 as amended by the additional tax) amendment act of 1967 was questioned as offending article 14. the act provided seven different kinds of plantations and imposed a uniform rate of rs. 50 per hectare and it also laid down .....

Nirma Limited. Vs. Saint GobaIn Glass India Limited and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... impugned order that when once it is admitted that the purpose of section 9a of the act is to maintain level playing field and to prevent dumping, while allowing healthy competition, and it was to prevent unfair trade practices, the 1995 amendment came into existence pursuant to article vi of the general agreement on tariffs and trade, ..... nature, one cannot say that any error in the same cannot be questioned. he would rely upon the decision in mohtesham mohd. ismail v. enforcement directorate, (2007) 8 scc 254.17.3. it is his submission that the designated authority, who is quasi judicial authority, cannot file appeal against the order of the learned ..... it is a domestic industry. it is in this context the term "domestic industry" assumes importance.33. sections 9a and 9c of the act, which were introduced by the customs tariff (amendment) act, 1995 enabling the imposition of anti-dumping duty on dumped articles, were inserted by the parliament pursuant to the general agreement on tariffs and .....

N. Sathianathan, Vs. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Salem an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1968Mad236; (1968)1MLJ31

..... regional transport authority dated 7-1-1966 be quashed.(2) sec 43(1) before its amendment by central act no. 100 of 1956 conferred power on the state government to fix, having regard to the desirability of preventing uneconomic competition among motor vehicles and after hearing the representatives of the interests affected and consulting the provincial ..... to fix in the case of motor cabs fares that might be charged. central act 100 of 1956 amended these provisions. as amended s. 43(1)(i) conferred on the state government power to issue having regard to the desirability of preventing uneconomic competition among motor vehicles, directions from time to time to the state transport authority ..... power was given to the regional transport authority or the state transport authority before the central act 100 of 1956 to fix fares for other kinds of motor vehicles. the position appears to be no different even after the amending act of 1956.(5) for the state it is said that the power for the regional .....

P. Sankara Narayanan, Proprietor, Shri Bhuvaneswari Films Vs. State of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2007Mad317; (2007)9VST401(Mad)

..... has been filed on behalf of the state, wherein it is indicated that intention of the (3rd amendment) act is to encourage of new films within the state and to enable low budget tamil films to withstand the competition from films produced in other languages and dubbed in tamil. it has been further stated that since ..... provisions contained in the (3rd amendment) act are discriminatory or violative of article 19. on the other hand, it is submitted that the object is to encourage and protect the producers, who produce their films in tamil, as they have to face stiff competition in the shape of dubbed tamil films.8. in : (2007)6scc624 (aashirwad films v. ..... justify the present provisions. the objects and reasons of the (2nd amendment) act, are extracted hereunder:statement of objects and reasons - with a view to encourage the production of new films in this state and to enable low budget tamil films to withstand the competition from films production on other languages and dubbed in tamil, it is .....