Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Sorted by: recent Page 4 of about 140,066 results (0.687 seconds)

Apr 19 2024 (SC)

Pernod Ricard India (p) Ltd. Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... thereafter be read and construed as if the altered words had been written into the earlier act with pen and ink and the old words scored out so that thereafter there is no need to refer to the amending act at all. no doubt, in certain situations, the court having regard to the purport and object sought to be achieved by the legislature ..... may construe the word substitution as an amendment having a prospective effect. therefore, we do not think that it is a universal rule ..... steps : first, the old rule is made to cease to exist and, next, the new rule is brought into existence in its place. the rule is that when a subsequent act amends an earlier one in such a way as to incorporate itself, or a part of itself, into the earlier, then the earlier .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Srividya C G Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Supratim Sarkar Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Sri K Ravi Nedungadi Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Rishabh Mishra Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Vinod Wadhawani Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Sri Ashok Wadhwa Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Mr Sujal Shah Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Ambit Private Limited Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Captain G R Gopinath Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... offences alleged to have been committed under the 1956 act. therefore, section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. b) the provisions of the companies act, 2013, are prospective. therefore, the special ..... without issuing summons is contrary to the guidelines laid down by the apex court in the case of inder mohan goswamy -vs- state of uttaranchal, 2007 12 scc1 12. submissions of sri amar correa, learned counsel for the petitioners in w.p.no.4381/2018 c/w w.p.no.4380/2018 ..... in appeal over commercial wisdom of the shareholders and the creditors. the petitioners assert that the amended composite scheme will benefit them and creditors, fostering competitiveness and increasing business value. therefore, it is a fit case to sanction the amended composite scheme of arrangement, and accordingly the scheme was sanctioned.-. 48 - nc:2024. khc .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //