Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Sorted by: recent Page 15 of about 140,066 results (0.592 seconds)

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Pacific Gaming Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Pramod Kumar K Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Pool N Club Vs. Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2022 (HC)

Federation Of Indian Fantasy Sports (fifs) Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rohan veeranna tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain rights ..... have been judicially held to be 'business' activities protected under article 19(1) (g) vide chamarbaugwala-ii: at paragraph 5 it is observed: as regards competitions which involve substantial skill however, different considerations arise. they are business activities, the protection of which is guaranteed by article 19(1) (g) it is ..... i.e., they played less often when they lost money and more often when they won money. also, a large- scale british study in 2007 found no increase in the rate of problem gambling in the united kingdom since 1999 despite a large increase in the number of new gambling opportunities... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2022 (SC)

Southern Power Distribution Power Company Limited Of Andhra Pradesh (a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 45 crores per mw).5. owing to certain change in conditions, the parties agreed to amend the initial ppa. accordingly, an amended and restated ppa dated 15th april, 1998, was entered into between apseb and hnpcl. between the years 1998 and 2007, the amended and restated ppa, for sale of power by hnpcl to apseb, was not implemented. subsequently ..... was compelled to supply 100% of power generated to the state. he further submitted that it is evident from the record that hnpcl had participated in the competitive bidding process 9 air1964sc99310 w.p. no.26254 of 2013 decided by orissa high court on 18.04.2014 11 ilr2004kar221512 air2002rajasthan 274 (db) 13 (2006) ..... process of bidding in accordance with the guidelines issued by the central government, the commission shall adopt such tariff in accordance with the provisions of the act; regulation 5.2 of the tariff regulations provides that the provisions specified in part ii of the said regulation shall apply in determining tariff based on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2022 (SC)

State Of Gujarat Vs. Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. Through It ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... criminal adjudication. reliance is placed upon the decision of this court in hindustan steel ltd. vs. state of orissa, (1969) 2 scc627and excel crop care limited vs. competition commission of india and anr., (2017) 8 scc47 4.30 it is submitted that in the facts of the present case the respondent had been under a genuine ..... manufacture of goods to be sold by the eligible entity. it is submitted that therefore thereafter the state is estopped from amending the conditions required to be met for obtaining the incentives, since the 28 respondent acted upon the assurance of the state that as long as it met the conditions, it would be eligible for receiving ..... that the state invited industries to invest in its state by offering incentives, which once granted would be valid for a fixed period i.e., till 21.02.2007 in case of the respondent, subject to the eligibility conditions being met. it is submitted that the first notification only stipulated imposition of additional conditions which had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2022 (SC)

Neil Aurelio Nunes Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... states to the aiq. the remaining seats in the state institutions are reserved for candidates domiciled in the respective states. 3 the constitution (ninety-third amendment) act 2005 amended article 15 of the constitution by inserting clause (5) to article 15 to empower the state to make special provisions (including reservation) for the ..... lead to a seemingly neutral system discriminating in favour of privileged candidates. as marc galanter notes, three broad kinds of resources are necessary to produce the results in competitive exams that qualify as indicators of merit . these are: (a) economic resources (for prior education, training, materials, freedom from work, etc.); (b) social ..... v. state of haryana59, a writ petition was filed seeking to quash the prospectus issued by maharishi dayanand university, rohtak, haryana for the academic session 2007-2008 to the extent that it did not provide any reservation of seats for sc and st candidates. one of the contentions raised by the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2022 (SC)

Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing And Marketing Corporation Limited ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... which are not deductible while computing the income chargeable under the head profits and gains of business or profession . section 40 of the act is amended in the year 2013, and 40(a)(iib) is inserted by amending act 17 of 2013, which has come into force from 01.04.2014. in terms of article 289 of the constitution of 3 2021 ..... detailed in the section are not deductible, in computing the income chargeable under the head profits and gains of business or profession . by the finance act, 2013 (act 17 of 2013), section 40 of the act is amended by inserting section 40(a)(iib), which has come into force from 01.04.2014. the said provision under section 40(a)(iib) reads as ..... , levy is an exclusive levy on the state government undertakings. therefore, we are of the considered view that any other interpretation would defeat the very object behind the amendment to income tax act, 1961. 19 [email protected].(c)no.12859 of 2020 etc. 14.1. it is fairly well settled that the interpretation is to be in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2021 (HC)

Vishweshwara C Vs. Registrar(evaluation)

Court : Karnataka

..... connected matters regarding valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme). hence in exercise of the powers conferred under section 35(1) of rguhs act, 1994, amendment to ordinance governing valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme) is notified as below. a. all answer scripts of undergraduate course in ..... the evaluation system with the ensuing march 2021 examinations. therefore, under compelling reasons, the vice- 22 chancellor of the respondent-university having taken note of amended mci regulations introduced the impugned ordinance. having done so, the same was placed before the committee of academic council held on 1.2.2021 which deliberated ..... or wisdom of the policies but only illegality. in directorate of film festivals v. gaurav ashwin jain this court held: [(2007) 4 scc737 para 16]. 33 16 .courts do not and cannot act as appellate authorities examining the correctness, suitability and appropriateness of a policy, nor are courts advisors to the executive on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2021 (HC)

Shashank S. Reddy Vs. Registrar (evaluation)

Court : Karnataka

..... connected matters regarding valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme). hence in exercise of the powers conferred under section 35(1) of rguhs act, 1994, amendment to ordinance governing valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme) is notified as below. a. all answer scripts of undergraduate course in ..... the evaluation system with the ensuing march 2021 examinations. therefore, under compelling reasons, the vice- 22 chancellor of the respondent-university having taken note of amended mci regulations introduced the impugned ordinance. having done so, the same was placed before the committee of academic council held on 1.2.2021 which deliberated ..... or wisdom of the policies but only illegality. in directorate of film festivals v. gaurav ashwin jain this court held: [(2007) 4 scc737 para 16]. 33 16 .courts do not and cannot act as appellate authorities examining the correctness, suitability and appropriateness of a policy, nor are courts advisors to the executive on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //