Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Sorted by: old Page 97 of about 140,128 results (0.552 seconds)

A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... examiner denied 4 relief because belt line rates to kankakee were less than the out-of-pocket cost, and were "lower than necessary to meet the barge competition." [ footnote 6 ] the commission reversed ..... of the lawfulness of the rates under 15(1) or 15(7) of the act, 41 stat. 484-487, as amended, 49 u.s.c. 15(1), 15(7). nor did the appellants file a formal complaint under 13 of the act, 24 stat. 383-384, as amended, 49 u.s.c. 13, assailing the lawfulness of the rates. subsequently, the ..... discriminated between connecting carriers. other objections that the rates violated 1(5) of the act [ footnote 10 ] as not being just and page 376 u. s. 381 reasonable were likewise refused consideration. while the commission found that the railroad's action was not a competitively destructive practice, it made no direct finding that the action did not violate the .....

Patel Kanchanbhai Mangalbhai and anr. Vs. Maneklal Maganlal Gandhi and ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1966Guj19; (1965)GLR200

..... when the petitioners came to know that respondent no. 1 was already declared as an elected candidate, the petitioners immediately applied for and obtained leave to amend the petition. the petitioners believed and that was the view strongly advocated before us which we have rejected as aforestat-ed--that it was not open to ..... the rejection of the nomination papers of the petitioners and communicated the name of respondent no. 1 to the district development officer and the district development officer, acting under rule 59, published the name of respondent no. 1 as elected candidate by issuing a notification dated 4th february 1964. this notification was, however, ..... , therefore, fixed by the district development officer as 20th february 1964 under section 18(1). after appointing the date of election, the district development officer acting under rule 8 appointed 29th january 1964 as the last date for filing nomination papers and 31st january 1964 as the date for scrutiny of nomination papers. .....

Fpc Vs. Hunt

Court : US Supreme Court

..... d.c. 36, 278 f.2d 870, cert. denied, 364 u.s. 891 (certificate conditioned upon removal of clauses permitting cancellation depending on price relationship of gas and competitive fuels in gas purchase contracts upon which feasibility of pipeline project depended); transwestern pipeline co., 22 f.p.c. 391, 394-395, modified on rehearing, 22 f.p ..... and conditions as the public convenience and necessity may require." [ footnote 2 ] the commission did have authority with reference to the entry of a natural gas company into a competitive market, but not into new and unserviced markets. [ footnote 3 ] see, e.g., florida economic advisory council v. federal power comm'n, 102 u.s.app.d ..... an application for a certificate, and may by regulation exempt from the requirements of this section temporary acts or operations for which the issuance of a certificate will not be required in the public interest." section 7(e), 52 stat. 824, as amended, 56 stat. 84, 15 u.s.c. 717f(e), provides: "(e) except in the .....

United States Vs. El Paso Natural Gas Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . 656 -657. 2. a review of the record, composed mainly of undisputed evidence, clearly shows that the "effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition" in california under 7 of the act. pp. 376 u. s. 657 -662. (a) the production, transportation and sale of natural gas is a "line of commerce," and california is a ..... ] reversed. mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [ footnote 1 ] section 7 of the clayton act, 38 stat. 731, as amended in 1950 by the celler-kefauver anti-merger act, 64 stat. 1125, 15 u.s.c. 18, provides in relevant part: "no corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, ..... 's order, holding that page 376 u. s. 656 it should not have acted until the district court had passed on the clayton act issues. california v. federal power comm'n, 369 u. s. 482 . meanwhile (in october, 1960), the united states amended its complaint so as to include the asset acquisition in the charged violation of the .....

United States Vs. First Nat'l Bank of Lexington

Court : US Supreme Court

..... posed under 2. reversed. mr. justice brennan and mr. justice white agree with the court that the elimination of competition between the two banks in the circumstances here presented was a violation of 1 of the sherman act. they would rest the reversal, however, solely on the conclusion that the factors relied on in united states v. ..... lexington do a negligible amount of business in the county. there is also a negligible amount of competition from corporate fiduciaries outside fayette county. we turn then to the facts relevant to the alleged restraint of trade under the sherman act. prior to the consolidation, the relative size of first national as compared to its five competitors ..... that act. [ footnote 1 ] 26 stat. 209 as amended, 15 u.s.c. 1, 2. the plan of consolidation was submitted to the comptroller of the currency and he, pursuant to the provision of the bank merger act of 1960, 74 stat. 129, 12 u.s.c (supp. iv) 1828(c), requested and received reports of the probable competitive .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South Vs. Jagannath Narsingdas

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1965]55ITR128(Bom)

..... recourse be had to section 24(1)).' in view of the said decision of the privy council, there can be no doubt whatsoever that under the act of 1922, before its amendment by the amending act of 1939, an assessee in his individual assessment was entitled to adjust the loss suffered by him in an unregistered partnership business against his profits in ..... arunachalam chettiar v. commissioner of income-tax, have changed the position of a partner in an unregistered firm and, consequently, the said decision cannot be applied to cases under the amended act.6. section 24, so far as material for our purpose, is as follows :'24. (1) where any assessee sustains a loss of profits or gains in any year ..... view, according to the learned counsel, is no longer capable of being sustained in view of the changes introduced in the law by the amending act of 1939.4. now, the privy counsel in arunachalam chettiar v. commissioner of income-tax held that whether a firm is registered or unregistered, a partner's share .....

Kudilal Govindram Seksaria and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Ce ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1964]54ITR653(Bom)

..... had no right to make a best judgment assessment for non-compliance with the said notices. the argument advanced was that prior to the amendment of section 22(4) by the amending act of 1953, the income-tax officer could under the said section ask only for the production of accounts and documents and not for any ..... information on a notice under section 22(4). the argument was negatived by the appellate assistant commissioner who took the view that the amendment of section 22(4) effected by the amendment act was clearly a procedural amendment and was, therefore, applicable to all assessments, which were then pending. since the notices issued under section 22(4) were ..... of persons similarly situated. now, in the case of some persons o this class of their assessments might have been completed before the amendment of section 22(4) was brought in by the amending act of 1953. in the assessments proceedings of these persons, the income-tax officer could have no authority it require them by a .....

Simpson Vs. Union Oil Co. of California

Court : US Supreme Court

..... dealers are coercively laced into an arrangement under which their supplier is able to impose noncompetitive prices on thousands of persons whose prices otherwise might be competitive. the evil of this resale price maintenance program, like that of the requirements contracts held illegal by standard oil co. of california v. united states ..... and is allegedly not renewable unless prescribed conditions are met, including the retailer's adherence to prices set by respondent. when petitioner, allegedly to meet a competitive price, sold gasoline below the fixed price, respondent, solely for that reason, refused to renew the lease and terminated the "consignment" agreement, whereupon petitioner ..... hartford indemnity co. v. illinois, 298 u. s. 155 . congress, too, has entered parts of the field, establishing by the act of june 10, 1930, 46 stat. 531, as amended, 7 u.s.c. 499a et seq., a pervasive system of control over commission merchants dealing in perishable agricultural commodities. one who sends .....

Labor Board Vs. Fruit Packers

Court : US Supreme Court

..... remanded. page 377 u. s. 59 mr. justice brennan delivered the opinion of the court. under 8(b)(4)(ii)(b) of the national labor relations act, as amended, [ footnote 1 ] it is an unfair labor practice for a union "to threaten, coerce, or restrain any person," with the object of "forcing or ..... was well established in the state cases by 1940. the distinction was sometimes justified on the ground that the secondary employer, who was presumed to receive a competitive benefit from the primary employer's nonunion, and hence lower, wage scales, was in "unity of interest" with the primary employer, goldfinger v. feintuch, 276 ..... not only picketing, but leaflets, radio broadcasts and newspaper advertisements, thereby interfering with freedom of speech." " * * * *" ". . . one of the apparent purposes of the amendment is to prevent unions from appealing to the general public as consumers for assistance in a labor dispute. this is a basic infringement upon freedom of expression. [ footnote 18 ]" this .....

Ahmedabad Millowners' Association and Anr. Vs. Thakore (i.G.) (Preside ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1965Guj112; (1964)GLR705; (1965)ILLJ567Guj

..... 1)(b) of the state act which deals with taxes in respect prize competitions for which a licence had to be obtained became void but not the rest. the supreme court further held that when the words 'for which a licence has been obtained' under s. 8 were removed by the mysore amending act, xxvi of 1957, the ..... rest of the clause (b) in s. 12(1) of the state act ..... in the province of bombay as against the central act the central legislature having passed several amending acts amending that act, the central act would prevail as from the dates when the amending acts came into force and the bombay industrial relations act, therefore, would be void unless every time the acts amending the industrial disputes act were enacted a fresh assent was obtained. as an .....