Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Court: orissa Page 4 of about 984 results (0.169 seconds)

Mar 25 1952 (HC)

Jagadish Patel Vs. Patel Tobacco Co. and G.C. Sankar

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1952Ori260; 18(1952)CLT284

..... the province except in accordance with a permit issued by the appropriate authority. thus the main purpose of the impugned order is to prevent indiscriminate and unrestricted competition in the purchase of kendu leaves by requiring any person engaged in such an undertaking to obtain a licence from the appropriate authority and also fixing a ..... committee appointed by the government to report on the sambalpur land laws devoted three pages to a discussion of this vexed dispute in the district and suggested some amendments to the tenancy laws regulating the fights of the tenants and landlords in respect of the leaves. pages 63 to 65 of the report of the sambalpur ..... orissa kendu leaves (control and distribution) order, 1949 which is an offence punishable under section 10 of the orissa essential articles control and requisitioning (temporary powers) act, 1947 (orissa act i of 1947). the petitioner in m. j. c. no. 78 of 1951 is the owner of some landed property in mouza laikera in the district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1950 (HC)

Raghunath Patnaik Vs. State Transport Authority and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori81; 16(1950)CLT202

..... is not convenient to introduce efficient control over the management of the various services in order to give better facilities to the public and to avoid uneconomical and rival competitions. the regional transport authority should, therefore, consult the provincial transport authority before the grant of renewal of any permit or change of timings or fares of the ..... to issue directions from time to time for their guidance (see sub-section (4) of schedule 4). by an amendment made in 1942, a new sub-section (sub-section (5) was inserted in schedule 4 of that act and the p. t. a. was given the power to delegate such of its powers and functions to such ..... the constitution for quashing an order dated 27-7-50 passed by the chairman, state transport authority while purporting to decide an appeal under section 64, motor vehicles act, 1939, against an order of the regional transport authority, puri, granting a permit for stage carriage on the route from banpur to berhampur to the petitioner sri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1985 (HC)

Kanhubhai Kotocha Vs. MinajuddIn Ahmed and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1985(II)OLR130

..... concerned. was for five years from 15 6 ,1960. by orissa house rent control (amendment) act, 1963 (orissa act 30 of 1963), the words 'five years' occurring in section 1(4) of the act were substituted by the woe is 'eight years'. this amendment act (orissa act 30 of 1953) after receiving assent of the president was published in the official gazette ..... the re-assembly of the legislature. in other words, the ordinance expired on 4. 5. 1967. so the 1958 act expired on that day. when the principal act of 1958 expired on 4. 5. 1967, the amending act 7 of 1967 which, was published in the orissa gazette on 19. 5. l967 became infructuous and could not come into ..... of the aforesaid ordinance were incorporated in orissa house rent control (amendment) act, 1967 (orissa act 7 of 1957) which received the assent of president on 29. 4. 1957, published in the orissa gazette on 19. 5.1967.as noticed earlier the amendment act intended to extend life of orissa act 31 of 1958 to eleven years from the date of its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1978 (HC)

Harikishandas Bajoria and anr. Vs. E.i.D. Parry Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1979Ori80

..... of civil procedure by the amending act of 1976, rules 58 (as amended in this court) and 63 of the code of 1908 read thus :--'58. (1) when any claim is preferred to any property, ..... to establish the right which he claims to the property in dispute, but, subject to the result of such suit, if any, the order shall be conclusive.' by the amendment of 1976, the order under rule 58 is open to appeal and against the appellate decision right of suit has been conferred.mr. mohanty for the petitioners contends that limitation ..... under the new act, limitation runs from the date of the 'final' order. the cause of action for the suit contemplated in article 98 arises when an order adverse to the interest of the plaintiff under the appropriate provision of law is made and the suit has to be filed within one year therefrom. prior to the amendment of the code .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1976 (HC)

National Coal Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1976Ori159; 42(1976)CLT580

..... sub-section shall be inserted, namely:-- '(2a) the holder of a mining lease, whether granted before or after the commencement of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) amendment act, 1972, shall not be liable to pay any royalty in respect of any coal consumed by a workman engaged in a colliery provided that such consumption by the workman does ..... we think the decision of the calcutta high court is of any assistance to mr. mohanty's contention.6. mr. mohanty next relies upon the provisions of the. amending act in support of his contention. he claims that as from the working of the statutory provision, it transpired that the true intention of the statute as contained in section ..... the other hand, a new sub-section was added to confer for the first time a benefit. the manner in which sub-section (2-a) of the amending act has been couched comes to support the contention advanced on behalf of the state that the benefit was intended to be conferred for the first time. a limit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1961 (HC)

Sadhya Chandra Behera Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1962Ori123

..... of the question of title between rival claimants to the suit land, namely, the plaintiff and the defendant no. 4 who is opposite party no. 4 herein as competitive bidders for the suit land as aforesaid. this aspect, by itself, is decisive on the question whether the suit was in substance one for declaration of title with consequential ..... mr. r. c. misra, learned counsel for the plaintiff petitioner also contended that,--assuming section 7(iv)(c) applied,--the amount assessed was excessive in view of the orissa amendment of the section. this argument is successfully repelled by mr. b.k. pal, learned counsel,--appearing on behalf of the defendant no. 4, being opposite party no. 4 ..... for consideration in this civil revision is whether the case comes under section 7(iv)(c) or section 7(xi) (d) or (e) of the court-fees act, 1870 (act vii of 1870). the settled legal position for determination of such question is that it is the real nature and substance of the plaint in the suit and not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1974 (HC)

Ajit Prasad Narayan Singh Vs. Smt. Nandini Satpathy

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1975Ori184

..... subsequently tampered with, altered and corrected without authority of law and/or without a formal petition by way of amendment? if so, is the petition liable to be dismissed under section 86(1) of the representation of the people act, 1951? (12) has any alteration and modification been made in the verification and affidavit annexed to the ..... to fulfil the requirements of that section later. sub-section (5) of section 86 of the act also corroborates this view because it provides that the high court may allow opportunities of any corrupt practice alleged in the petition to be amended or amplified in such manner as may, in its opinion, be- necessary for ensuring a ..... practice which was not previously alleged in the petition, by way of amendment. the requirements of attestation and verification are provided in this section 83 of the act and defects in the same can be allowed to be cured subsequently. section 87 of the act provides that the election petition shall be tried by the high court as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Samantasinghar and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1988]173ITR425(Orissa)

..... the income in respect of which the particulars have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished. '9. clause (iii) and the proviso were again substituted by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975, with effect from april 1, 1976, as follows :' (iii) in the cases referred to in clause (c), in addition to any tax payable by him, a ..... accordingly. the appeal before the appellate assistant commissioner by the assessee also failed. before the tribunal, the contention that the order of penalty having been passed after the amendment of the act in 1976, i.e., after april 1, 1976, the computation should have heen made according to the law as existed on the date of the order was ..... on the case of shyam lal v. state, air 1968 all 392. that was a case under the prevention of food adulteration act and during the pendency of the trial, the punishing section was amended reducing the rigour of the law and, accordingly, it was held that the court has to take into consideration the law as it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2013 (HC)

Executive Engineer(Electrical)southco, Phulbani and Vs. Smt. R. Wara L ...

Court : Orissa

..... at rs.12,961/- per month and limited it to rs.8,000/- for the purpose of calculating compensation amount which was brought into force by way of amendment of the act w.e.f. 31.05.2010 while the death of the deceased occurred on 29.05.2010 ?.9. so far question no.(i) is concerned, undisputedly the ..... the deceased. the commissioner should have taken the wages of the deceased at rs.4,000/- which was prevalent on the date of the accident since amendment brought to section 4 of the act has no retrospective effect.18. the commissioner has calculated the amount of compensation at rs.5,70,720/- taking the monthly wages at rs.8,000 ..... quantum of compensation. therefore, the commissioner has rightly applied the amended provisions while accepting the monthly wages of the deceased. placing reliance on the cases of pratap narin singh deo (supra) and national insurance co. ltd. vs. musabir ahmed and another, 2007 (2) tac 3 (sc), oriental insurance co. ltd. vs. mohd. nasir and another, 2009(3) tac 598( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1974 (HC)

K. Jagadish Hitter Vs. Revenue Divisional Commissioner, Southern Divis ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1975]35STC152(Orissa)

..... transferee shall within thirty days of the transfer apply for registration under section 9.a comparison of section 19(1) of the act as it stood prior to the amendment and after the amendment reveals no essential difference. the amended section 19(1) is only in a little more expanded form. thus any argument that the citation referred to above being ..... altered the context and so that citation has no application to the facts of this case.(b) to appreciate this contention, section 19(1) of the act, as it stood prior to its amendment, may be quoted :19. (1) when the ownership of the business of a registered dealer is entirely transferred, any tax payable in respect of such ..... over the pre-amendment section 19(1) of the act is inapplicable to the post-amendment section 19(1) of the act, is utterly untenable. the further line of argument that section 19(1) has assumed a new complexion because of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //