Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 8 of about 264 results (0.117 seconds)

Reliance Energy Ltd. Vs. the Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... data also. she further submitted that vide letters dated february 07, 2007 and february 13, 2007, merc sought certain queries from rel which were duly replied by it vide its letters dated february 9, 2007, february 10, 2007 andfebruary 12,2007 and that this shows that rel had acted fast in giving requisite information and details to merc.8. ms anjali ..... fy 2007-08 to fy 2009-10.submission of the petition was delayed by rel ..... ) petition to merc by november 30, 2006 for the fy 2007-08 as per regulations 9 of the merc (terms and conditions) tariff appeal no. 90 of 2007 regulations notified by merc under provisions of the electricity act, 2003 (the act). merc was determining tariff for the year 2007-08 which was a part of the first myt period for .....

In the Matter Of: Hindalco Industries Limited Vs. West Bengal Electric ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... cost. 11. the tribunal entertained this appeal no. 3/07 and heard the learned counsel for the parties. ultimately, the tribunal by the judgment dated 31.10.2007 allowed the appeal no. 3/07, set aside the impugned order dated 16.11.2006 passed by the state commission and again remanded the matter back to the state ..... to wheel any power. under those circumstances, the appellant cannot claim to have been aggrieved over the impugned order, within the meaning of section 111 of the electricity act and the appeal is not maintainable. 17. with regard to this point of maintainability, the learned counsel for the appellant would make the following reply: (a) the ..... such regulations. section 62 provides for determination of tariff for wheeling electricity. the wheeling charges is in the nature of a tariff contemplated in section 62 of the act. schedule-4 of the wberc (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations 2005 i.e. tariff regulations of 2005 have laid down the principle of terms and conditions .....

Rico Auto Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. Haryana Electricity Regulator ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... quarterly has to be read in the context of the whole regulation. the regulation is merely laying down the frequency in which a tariff may be amended. the idea is to maintain stability in the tariff. normally, the regulation provides, the tariff should not change more than once in a financial year ..... the situation and a letter of the additional advocate general was sent to this tribunal stating therein: reference to this office fax dated 5.3.2007. it is clarified that rs.391.55 crore fsa liability taken over by the haryana government. was in respect of all categories of consumers. ..... the plea of limitation prescribed by section 56(2) of the electricity act. 11. our attention has been drawn towards regulation no. 4(1) of the tariff regulations 1999 which reads as under: 4(1) no tariff may be amended more frequently than once in any financial year except that tariff rates ..... the appeals have no force and they are accordingly dismissed. pronounced in open court on this 10th day of july, 2007. .....

B.M. Verma Chairman and Managing Vs. Uttarakhand Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... to the proceedings leading to the impugned order the relevant portion of the notice is extracted below: subject: notice under section 142, 149 of electricity act, 2003 (act no. 36 of 2003, as amended by act no. 57 of 2003) for non-compliance of commission's directions with regard to tod meter reading by whereas this commission has passed orders giving ..... basis of consumption downloaded from their meters through mri. if shri verma still fails to implement these directions to commission's satisfaction till 31.03.2007, further action u/s 146 of the electricity act, 2003 will be taken against him. this penalty is being imposed on shri verma in his personal capacity and will therefore not be paid ..... directions and punishing him with fine of rs.5,000/- and with further fine of rs.100/- for each day of continued default. the ia no. 136 of 2007 is for stay of the impugned order.2. the penal action was taken against the appellant pursuant to a notice dated 01.12.2006 since the notice is vital .....

M/S. Nalwa Steel and Power Ltd. New Delhi Vs. Chhattisgarh State Power ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... transmission line can go from the captive generating station to a load centre and such load centre can also be a consumer. section 9 of the act with the amendment of 2007 specifically provides that to supply to a consumer, the captive generating station shall not need a license. no such exemption has been given to a generating ..... station under section 10 of the act. in this view one may say that a generating company may need license to supply to a consumer through a dedicated ..... judgment in the case of southern petrochemical industries co. ltd.. vs. electricity inspector and etio and ors. (2007) 5 scc 447. 17) there is nothing in the new act which specifically destroys all sanctions already granted under section 28 of the electricity act 1910. therefore, by virtue of the provision of section 6 of the general clauses .....

In the Matter Of: Gujarat Electricity Transmission Company Ltd Sardar ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... licensees. 39 further, this tribunal in the matter of electricity department, government of goa versus maharashtra electricity regulatory commission being appeal no. 150 of 2007 has held that system of maharashtra transmission utility used for conveyance of electricity for goa is intervening transmission system and only the central commission has ..... in due course, the commission will come out with draft regulations under section 36 of the act so as to deal with the issue of determination of transmission charges for intervening inter-state transmission facilities. 33. above discussion leads one to ..... matter relating to use of state transmission system for conveyance of power to other licensees is more appropriately covered under sections 35 and 36 of the act. these explicit statutory provisions cannot be ignored. we are therefore proceeding by specifying method of calculation of the transmission charges in the present case. .....

Jalan Concast Ltd., Unit 2, Vs. U.P. Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL192

..... in its appeal no. fa 96 and others of 2002. the appellants filed petition no. 458 of 2007 before the commission challenging the bill as being barred by section 56(2) of the electricity act 2003. section 56(2) of the electricity act 2003 bars recovery of dues which are not being shown on the bills for two years.the appellant contended ..... was struck down by the high court in lml ltd v. state of uttar pradesh and ors. 2001(2) awc 1472 on the ground that the circular amounted to amendment of tariff order passed by the commission and the uppcl being the licensee had no such power. the uppcl accordingly on 31.08.01 withdrew its circulars dated 08. ..... the respondent submits that the appellant should have approached the forum for redressal of grievances of the consumers established under sub-section 5 of section 42 of the electricity act 2003. the learned counsel for the appellant on the other hand submits that the issue involved in this appeal is not one which falls within the jurisdiction of such .....

In the Matter of Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. Lucknow Vs. Cent ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the respondents agreed to pay the amount after reconciliation. the last meeting, the minutes of which are held on record, took place on 7/8.6.2007. at this meeting as well, the representative of the second respondent accepted to make payment of dues after reconciliation. 35. from the above noted facts, ..... to ensure supply of power and compensation. (vii) under these circumstances, the madhya pradesh trading company, the 2nd respondent filed a petition 107 of 2007 before the central commission praying for the direction to the appellant to release the legitimate madhya pradeshs full share of supply from both rihand hydro power ..... for adjudication of all kind of disputes. the preamble of the act reads as under: an act to consolidate the laws relating to, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity and generally for taking measures conducive to development of electricity industry, promoting competition therein, protecting interest of consumers and supply of electricity to all .....

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Through Its Chairman Vs. Sas Hotels and E ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... to the destination of his own use: [provided also that the state commission shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made ..... portion of the power offered by respondent no.1. the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into under section 44 of the electricity (supply) act 1948 were amenable to amendment from time to time. the appellant had right to withdraw the approval given, without assigning any reason and without any liability to pay compensation. ..... generation of electricity through windmills of the firm. 24. the firm shall also be bound by the provisions of the indian electricity act, 1910, electricity (supply) act, 1948, indian electricity rules, 1956 as amended from time to time. 25. the board shall be at liberty to cancel the permission to operate the firms windmill generator .....

In the Matter Of: Northern Railway (Headquarters) Vs. Punjab State Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... while claiming tariff increase or determining the same. as a matter of fact, this tribunal took note of the above circular in its judgment dated 28.11.2007 in appeal no. 219 of 2006 titled northern railway versus uttranchal electricity regulatory commission and held as follows: similarly while the tariff fixed for the appellant ..... commission under section 86(1)(b) is that it shall adjudicate upon the dispute between the licensees and the generating companies. section 95 of the act clearly stipulates that all the proceedings before the appropriate commission shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings and the appropriate commission shall be deemed to be a ..... serving masses of the country and is a major contributor to the growth and development of national economy, without following the relevant provisions of the electricity act, and the circular issued by the ministry of power to all the state governments and the electricity boards emphasizing the importance of providing electricity to the .....