Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 16 of about 264 results (0.070 seconds)

In the Matter Of: West Central Railway Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regul ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... cost of supply should have been within 20% of the cost of supply at the respective voltage of supply. the legislature by amending section 61(g) of the electricity act by act 26 of 2007 by substituting eliminating cross subsidies has expressed its intent that cross subsidies may not be eliminated. 17. the tariff policy provides ..... railway is a public utility and plays an important function of providing mass transportation. this tribunal in judgment in appeal nos. 78 of 2005, 148 of 2007 and 124 of 2008 has observed that the railways serve the public at large and should be supplied electricity at reasonable price. 3.4 railway traction draws ..... determination proceedings before the state commission. by not creating a separate category for railway traction the state commission has not violated any provisions of the electricity act or tariff policy or the tariff regulations. creation of separate category for railway traction in other states is not a sufficient ground for accepting the contentions .....

Runwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Elecy. Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... supply, distribution, consumption or use of power for securing equitable distribution of electricity and promoting competition. we, however, in our judgment held that while load management charge can be imposed under section 23 of the electricity act 2003, it did not form part of the tariff for generation, transmission and distribution and ..... ltd. and m/s. vasudev c. wadhwa constructions) and rel, the distribution licensee, is of the view that with the subsequent judgment dated december 19, 2007 issued in case of arr determination of maharashtra state electricity distribution company limited, the applicability of tariff category lt-9 for multiplexes and shopping malls getting supply of ..... of more than 20 kw and had been classified under lt-ii (non-domestic) and ht-ii (industrial) category.vide impugned order dated 18.05.2007, the commission created a new category of lt-ix for multiplexes and shopping malls having sanctioned load of more than 20 kw including single ownership establishments. .....

In the Matter of Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Vs. Mah ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... necessary to refer to the relevant facts to understand this case fully which has got a chequered history. they are as follows. 20. pursuant to the competitive bidding process, the appellant was awarded a contract for the operation, maintenance, management, etc. of the mumbai airport. accordingly, an agreement was entered into between ..... rate of tariff under the category lt-ix, approached the tribunal and filed the appeal challenging the said order. by the order dated 19.12.2007, the tribunal set aside formation of the lt-ix category with high tariff holding that the basis adopted by the state commission by creating such category ..... to be classified separately having regard to the essential nature of their services and also their contribution in the development of infrastructure within the state. (v) the electricity act, 2003 mandates that the appropriate commission has to differentiate between consumers in the process of determination of tariff depending upon (a) load factor, (b) power factor .....

Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd, Haryana Vs. Central Electricity Re ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... part while calculating the availability of appellants transmission system for the year 2006-07. the import of the tariff regulation 2004 along with its first amendment providing for calculation of availability of the transmission system as per appendix iii to the said regulations provides that the availability of each category of the transmission ..... of the healthy pole which resulted in loss of generation, and resultantly transfer of electricity to the southern region was affected. the srpc on 03.05.2007 certified the availability of the talcher-kolar transmission system at 96.98% as against 97.53% as claimed by the appellant strictly in terms of the ..... of transmission elements for the following contingencies shall be excluded from the total time of the element under period of consideration. i) outage of elements due to acts of god and force majeure events beyond the control of the transmission licensee. however, onus of satisfying the member secretary, reb that element outage was due to .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd Vs. Maharashtra Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... protocol approved by the commission vide its operative order dated may 31, 2008 and detailed tariff order dated june 20, 2008, in case 72 of 2007, will continue to be in force for a demand-supply gap of around 4500 mw, since msedcl has not been able to produce any evidence of ..... consumer interest and measures conducive to development of the electricity industry: an act to consolidate the laws relating to generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity and generally for taking measures conducive to development of electricity industry, promoting competition therein, protecting interest of consumers and supply of electricity to all areas, rationalisation ..... contra, the state commission has submitted that it is empowered to direct msedcl to follow the protocol citing the provisions of section 23 of the electricity act (the act), which is reproduced below: directions to licensees. 23. if the appropriate commission is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to .....

Lanco Kondapalli Power Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Haryana Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... we give our unconditional acceptance to the rfp project document issued by the haryana power generation corporation (r-2) as part of the rfp march 01, 2007 as amended. we shall ensure that we shall execute such rfp project documents as per the provisions of the rfp. we have submitted the bids on the terms and ..... -2560136/2560805 kind attention: mr. sanjeev kaushal, ias purchase of power on long-germ basis for uhbvnl dhbvnl sir, re: hpgcl case 1 tariff based competitive bidding purchase of power on long-term basis for uhbvnl and dhbvnl ..the impact on project development due to constraints, decisions or actions of any agency of the ..... inter alia engaged in power generation and sale through its power plant located at ida, kondapalli, ibrahimpatnam mandal, krishna district, andhra pradesh (india). .. the plaintiff acting as a leader in a consortium comprising of the plaintiff and lanco infratech ltd., submitted their evident interest in response to the rfq and participated in the process .....

M/S. Ispat Industries Ltd, Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra State Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... this tribunal in the case of eurotex is prospective or retrospective? c) whether the additional supply charge determined by the commission in its order dated 18th may, 2007 with all its amendments and with modification of this tribunal in its order dated 12th may, 2008 can be made applicable to the appellant? 23. a broad discussion presented herein ..... matter the order of this tribunal as aforesaid with retrospective operation. c) the issue relating to benchmark of the reference period for calculation of asc has already been acted upon and cannot be reopened. 24. according to mr. umapathy, the tribunals judgment as aforesaid was confined to eurotex in relation to the facts and circumstances ..... of new machinery and idling of labour force. d) if the benchmarking for calculation of the asc applicable to m/s. eurotex is fixed at low levels, it acts as a fetter to m/s. eurotex to avail the incentive for reduced asc units, as also provided under the impugned order. e) the effect of the provisions .....

Dodson-lindblom Hydro Power Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulator ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... need to encourage generation of secondary energy by making adequate provision in its regulations. we hope the commission will take remedial measures in this regard and bring appropriate amendment in the regulations. auxiliary consumption: 20) the commission has limited the auxiliary consumption to 1.2% whereas the appellant has asked for 1.44%. the ..... the table extracted above, some adjustment is suggested w.e.f. the year 2006-07. the commission contends that in the tariff petition, which is 27 of 2007, the appellant itself had prayed for the revised tariff to be applied from 01.01.07. the commission contends that in view of this prayer the commission ..... disregard secondary energy charge, we cannot but express our concern for encouraging energy generation on the one hand and rewarding efficiency on the other. section 61 of the act, inter alia, requires the commission to be guided by some factors while framing terms and conditions for determination of tariff. clause (c) of section 61 mentions .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Ltd. and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL478

..... tpc offering a lower tariff even to some consumers whose maximum demand was less than 1000 kva and rel was compelled to loose those categories by the unfair competition, besides incurring revenue loss. only to maintain the customers' sales rebate was offered and even after the rebate rel charged lesser than the higher cost of ..... recover from the consumers the entire amount that was illegally offered as rebate, either through its periodical bills or otherwise by withdrawing earlier bills and preferring amended bills at authorized tariff rates. tpc also prayed for a direction to restrain rel from granting any rebate or discount to its consumers in any form ..... . the said schedule prescribed the manner, modalities and circumstances under which the charges for electricity supply can be made. in terms of the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998, the commission fixes a tariff taking into consideration of various factors as prescribed in section 29 read with schedule vi. in case of any excess .....

Reliance Fuel Resources Ltd. Vs. Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... gas pipelines and city or local natural gas distribution networks, to facilitate open access for all players to the pipeline network on a non-discriminatory basis, promote competition among entities thereby avoiding any abuse of the dominant position by any entity, and secure the consumer interest in terms of gas availability and reasonable tariff for ..... bidding process has to be started in accordance with the regulations in order to select an entity in a prospective and objective manner through the process of competitive bidding for the purpose of protecting the interest of the consumers and, therefore, quick steps are being taken for the finalization of the regulations. on the ..... per the procedure prescribed under the regulations to be framed by the board. admittedly, when the applications have been submitted by the appellant on 03.09.2007 the act of 2006 the pipeline policy which was issued by the government on 20.12.2000 were in force. therefore, the appellants contention on the basis .....