Compellable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: compellable Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 391 results (0.014 seconds)Bell Vs. Wolfish
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1979
..... the mcc the courts below determined only whether double bunking was justified by a compelling necessity excluding fiscal and administrative considerations since it was readily ascertainable that the ..... rationale without question these searches are an imposition of sufficient gravity to invoke the compelling necessity standard it is equally indisputable that they cannot meet that standard indeed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGannett Co., Inc. Vs. Depasquale
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1979
..... right to a public trial he has no absolute right to compel a private trial footnote 12 the court has recognized that a ..... but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all and whose interest therefore ..... other and regarded as specially cogent evidence and the defendant was compelled to submit to examination 1 j stephen a history of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew York Tel. Co. Vs. New York Dept. of Labor
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-1979
..... present case the plurality appears to be saying that there is no preemption unless compelling congressional direction indicates otherwise the premise is therefore one of assumed priority on the ..... power is lacking machinists might still require a holding of preemption notwithstanding the lack of compelling congressional direction that the state statute be preempted i believe this conclusion to be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew Jersey Vs. Portash
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-20-1979
..... to the infliction of penalties affixed to criminal acts immunity from the use of compelled testimony as well as evidence derived directly and indirectly therefrom affords this protection it ..... prohibits the prosecutorial authorities from using the compelled testimony in any respect and it therefore insures that the testimony cannot lead to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-1979
Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;
..... offence results in death or serious physical injuries article 213 2 resisting a superior or compelling him to violate official duties an offence applicable only to military personnel and carrying the ..... precedents moreover in the present case there are two other supervening circumstances which justify nay compel reconsideration of the decision in jagmohan s case supra the first is the introduction of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCannon Vs. University of Chicago
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1979
..... to implication of a private remedy against the government as well as the recipient to compel the cutoff of funds although willing to extend private rights against discriminatory recipients the ..... burden of expensive vexatious litigation upon institutions whose resources often are severely limited may well compel an emphasis on objectively measured academic qualifications page 441 u s 748 at the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFcc Vs. Midwest Video Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-02-1979
..... just as it may not impose such obligations on television broadcasters authority to compel cable operators to provide common carriage of public originated transmissions must come specifically ..... 2 3 supra and even when not occasioning the displacement of alternative programming compelling cable operators indiscriminately to accept access programming will interfere with their determinations regarding .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTillinois State Bd. of Elections Vs. Socialist Workers Party
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-22-1979
..... by the 25 000 signature requirement yet appellant has advanced no reason much less a compelling one why the state needs a more stringent requirement for chicago at oral argument ..... has suggested no reasons that justify its continuation historical accident without more cannot constitute a compelling state interest we therefore hold that the illinois election code is unconstitutional insofar as it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabbitt Vs. United Farm Workers Nat'l Union
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-05-1979
..... employment relations board charged with responsibility for enforcing the act of any discretion to compel agricultural employers to furnish materials information time or facilities to labor organizations desirous of ..... need be pursued only if farmworkers desire to designate exclusive bargaining representatives and to compel their employer to bargain rights that are conferred by statute rather than the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSteelworkers Vs. Weber
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-1979
..... of newly discovered legislative history which leads it to a conclusion directly contrary to that compelled by the uncontradicted legislative history unearthed in mcdonald and our other prior decisions now ..... russell and byrd remained of the view that pressures exerted by federal agencies would compel employers to give priority definitely and almost completely in most instances to the members .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial